RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    國際建設契約 實務上 有意點 = Some Practical Issues on the International Construction Contract

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76485418

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Many Korean construction companies have been performing a variety of overseas construction projects since the 1970s. It is unfortunate that in many cases they have had to suffer big losses caused by errors and defects in the design and construction of the projects. In the author's opinion, however, there were losses that could have been avoided if they had understood better the feature and content of the particular construction contract. Few lawyers and scholars in Korea have been interested in the research and study of international construction contracts. This is mainly because they do not have access to practical sources outside of Korea for them to research and study since the contracts undertaken have been dealt with by law firms in other jurisdictions to which the disputes apply.
    This article is aiming primarily at the introduction of the issues which the practitioners are likely to confront in the process of reviewing and performing the international construction contract. In some cases solutions are sought about these issues based upon the FIDIC standard terms and conditions, the actual experience of practice, and UNIDROIT Principles, etc. It is reasonable to say that all the issues related to the international construction contract cannot be covered in a short article like this. The author wishes this article could induce subsequent studies on international construction contracts for further research.
    It has to be noted that from time to time Korean construction practices have been compared to the international ones for better understanding. This article mostly includes cases where the Korean construction companies go overseas for their projects, while there are some cases where foreign developers and financial investors participated in domestic projects in which international construction contracts forms were adopted.
    A few precedent domestic writings about international construction
    contracts seems to lack emphasis on the points that there are several standard construction contract forms and that they are different. The differences are mainly in accordance with who bears the design responsibility, how the owner has to make progress payments to the contractor and who the funding source for the project is. This article tries to make it clear that there are significant differences between the standard contract forms, e.g. a simple construction form, a design-build form and an EPC/turnkey form of contract.
    Again, the author hopes that this article can arouse the interest in the international construction contracts from both academic and practical fields, so that many subsequent advanced articles can help our construction industry become much more competitive in the world through awareness of the methods of procurement and administration of the contracts.
    번역하기

    Many Korean construction companies have been performing a variety of overseas construction projects since the 1970s. It is unfortunate that in many cases they have had to suffer big losses caused by errors and defects in the design and construction of...

    Many Korean construction companies have been performing a variety of overseas construction projects since the 1970s. It is unfortunate that in many cases they have had to suffer big losses caused by errors and defects in the design and construction of the projects. In the author's opinion, however, there were losses that could have been avoided if they had understood better the feature and content of the particular construction contract. Few lawyers and scholars in Korea have been interested in the research and study of international construction contracts. This is mainly because they do not have access to practical sources outside of Korea for them to research and study since the contracts undertaken have been dealt with by law firms in other jurisdictions to which the disputes apply.
    This article is aiming primarily at the introduction of the issues which the practitioners are likely to confront in the process of reviewing and performing the international construction contract. In some cases solutions are sought about these issues based upon the FIDIC standard terms and conditions, the actual experience of practice, and UNIDROIT Principles, etc. It is reasonable to say that all the issues related to the international construction contract cannot be covered in a short article like this. The author wishes this article could induce subsequent studies on international construction contracts for further research.
    It has to be noted that from time to time Korean construction practices have been compared to the international ones for better understanding. This article mostly includes cases where the Korean construction companies go overseas for their projects, while there are some cases where foreign developers and financial investors participated in domestic projects in which international construction contracts forms were adopted.
    A few precedent domestic writings about international construction
    contracts seems to lack emphasis on the points that there are several standard construction contract forms and that they are different. The differences are mainly in accordance with who bears the design responsibility, how the owner has to make progress payments to the contractor and who the funding source for the project is. This article tries to make it clear that there are significant differences between the standard contract forms, e.g. a simple construction form, a design-build form and an EPC/turnkey form of contract.
    Again, the author hopes that this article can arouse the interest in the international construction contracts from both academic and practical fields, so that many subsequent advanced articles can help our construction industry become much more competitive in the world through awareness of the methods of procurement and administration of the contracts.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 머리말
    • 제2장 國際建設契約의 分類
    • 제3장 FIDIC 標準契約條件 體系와 種類
    • 제4장 主要契約條項別 留意事項
    • 제5장 맺는 말
    • 제1장 머리말
    • 제2장 國際建設契約의 分類
    • 제3장 FIDIC 標準契約條件 體系와 種類
    • 제4장 主要契約條項別 留意事項
    • 제5장 맺는 말
    • 參考文獻
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "프로젝트 파이낸스와 EPC Turnkey 계약 - FIDIC Silver Book에 대한 소고" (8월호) : 2004년

    2 "채권총론, 제6판" 박영사.

    3 "영문국제계약해설" 한국수출입은행 2004

    4 "섭외사법의 개정에 관한 입법론 -국제계약법 분야 개정국제사법의 소개를 포함하여-" 2 :

    5 "금융거래법강의II" 법문사 2001

    6 "국제적 보증의 제문제" 한국무역상무학회 17 : 2002

    7 "국제사법과 국제소송 제2권" 박영사 2002

    8 "국제물품매매계약에서 Liquidated Damages Clauses 의 유효성과 실무적 적용에 관한 연구" 한국무역상무학회 17 : 2002

    9 "건설분쟁관계법 -건설분쟁의 법적 쟁점과 소송실무-" 박영사 2003

    10 "건설공사 계약관리와 클레임" 일간건설신문 2003

    1 "프로젝트 파이낸스와 EPC Turnkey 계약 - FIDIC Silver Book에 대한 소고" (8월호) : 2004년

    2 "채권총론, 제6판" 박영사.

    3 "영문국제계약해설" 한국수출입은행 2004

    4 "섭외사법의 개정에 관한 입법론 -국제계약법 분야 개정국제사법의 소개를 포함하여-" 2 :

    5 "금융거래법강의II" 법문사 2001

    6 "국제적 보증의 제문제" 한국무역상무학회 17 : 2002

    7 "국제사법과 국제소송 제2권" 박영사 2002

    8 "국제물품매매계약에서 Liquidated Damages Clauses 의 유효성과 실무적 적용에 관한 연구" 한국무역상무학회 17 : 2002

    9 "건설분쟁관계법 -건설분쟁의 법적 쟁점과 소송실무-" 박영사 2003

    10 "건설공사 계약관리와 클레임" 일간건설신문 2003

    11 "개정중재법의 몇가지 문제점 -국제상사중재를 중심으로-" 2 :

    12 "개방시대의 국제건설계약" 두비 1997

    13 "UNIDROIT 국제상사계약원칙에 있어서의 Hardship" 21 (21): 2002

    14 "The Law of Contract" Sweet & Maxwell 1995

    15 "Principles of International Commercial Contract" 2004

    16 "Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration" Sweet & Maxwell 1999

    17 "Hudson's Building and Engineering Contracts, 11th ed." Sweet & Maxwell 1 : 1995

    18 "FIDIC의 EPC/Turnkey 프로젝트용 표준약관에 관한 연구" 한국무역상무학회 18 : 2002

    19 "FIDIC's New Rainbow-An Overview of the Red, Yellow, Silver and Green Test Editions" 16 :

    20 "A Commentary on the International Construction Contract" Sweet & Maxwell 1991

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.83 0.83 0.83
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.78 0.77 0.747 0.33
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼