RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    에라스무스의『아동교육론』에서 찾아지는 플루타르코스의 흔적 = Erasmus` Treatise On Education for Children and the Vestiges of Plutarch

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82332012

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Is Erasmus an educational disciple of Plutarch? Driven by this question three points are made for conceptualizing Plutarch`s The Education of Children as the main source of Erasmus` essay On Education for Children. First, Erasmus follows Plutarch closely in asserting that nature is strong but education supplemented by training and experience is much stronger. Second, Plutarch`s ideas on education are present in Erasmus` educational opinion when they hold the highest respect for the master who are responsible for bringing up youth in virtue and learning. Third, in tracing the Plutarch`s influence, the similarity of Erasmus` ideas to Plutarch is found in their common interest in the advancement of humanistic curriculum and method. By admitting Erasmus` indebtedness to other ancient and contemporary educational authors(notably Quintilian), however, I can see the possible limitation of the influence of Plutarch on the educational thought of Erasmus. It is in this respect that further research regarding the multiple sources of Erasmus` treatise On Education of Children is in great need. A study on the educational connections of Erasmus and Plutarch sheds light on contemporary education. At least, three things deserve our highlighting. First, it helps us critique the prevailing market measure of education while conceiving education as a human service whose goal is to cultivate the moral and intellectual nature of humankind. Second, it teaches us that the good schoolmaster is characterized by a high degree of character, learning, and experience, the argument in favor of which is relevant today in teacher education. Third, it reminds us of the benefit of learning humanities such as history, literature, and philosophy that claim to educate humans as human beings understanding the deep inner side of human nature and its outer sensitivity toward life.
    번역하기

    Is Erasmus an educational disciple of Plutarch? Driven by this question three points are made for conceptualizing Plutarch`s The Education of Children as the main source of Erasmus` essay On Education for Children. First, Erasmus follows Plutarch clos...

    Is Erasmus an educational disciple of Plutarch? Driven by this question three points are made for conceptualizing Plutarch`s The Education of Children as the main source of Erasmus` essay On Education for Children. First, Erasmus follows Plutarch closely in asserting that nature is strong but education supplemented by training and experience is much stronger. Second, Plutarch`s ideas on education are present in Erasmus` educational opinion when they hold the highest respect for the master who are responsible for bringing up youth in virtue and learning. Third, in tracing the Plutarch`s influence, the similarity of Erasmus` ideas to Plutarch is found in their common interest in the advancement of humanistic curriculum and method. By admitting Erasmus` indebtedness to other ancient and contemporary educational authors(notably Quintilian), however, I can see the possible limitation of the influence of Plutarch on the educational thought of Erasmus. It is in this respect that further research regarding the multiple sources of Erasmus` treatise On Education of Children is in great need. A study on the educational connections of Erasmus and Plutarch sheds light on contemporary education. At least, three things deserve our highlighting. First, it helps us critique the prevailing market measure of education while conceiving education as a human service whose goal is to cultivate the moral and intellectual nature of humankind. Second, it teaches us that the good schoolmaster is characterized by a high degree of character, learning, and experience, the argument in favor of which is relevant today in teacher education. Third, it reminds us of the benefit of learning humanities such as history, literature, and philosophy that claim to educate humans as human beings understanding the deep inner side of human nature and its outer sensitivity toward life.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼