RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    미중 패권경쟁과 미국의 전략적 선택 = North Korea’s Strategy toward the International Human Rights Pressure

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103977752

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This Study explores the sino-american hegemonic competition and the strategic choice of U.S. The specific structures of the U.S.-centered international order enable the east-asian countries including China to promote the rapid economic development even in short terms. Furthermore, getting on the bandwagon of post-cold war international system, China makes efforts to enhance the comprehensive national capabilities, which would have approached the parity with U.S. approximately within 15 years. This power-shift is dramatically proceeding not only on the east-asian level but also on the global level. Now that the rise of China is not endowed with the democratic system values, but is equipped with exclusive sino-centrism, it possibly collides with the american exceptionalism which has a strong mission to democratize the uncivilized area. Therefore it is not surprising that sino-american hegemonic competition enforces the U.S. to make the strategic choice over the rise of China which could threat both U.S. security and their hegemonic position. Now the Bush administration is pursuing the congagement policy as China-policy, that combined the military containment with economic engagement. However, if China's power would continue to expand while keeping on undemocratic system, the U.S. could not rule out the possibility of the preventive war, that seemingly serves as key instrument for refraining China from ascending the hegemonic position.
    번역하기

    This Study explores the sino-american hegemonic competition and the strategic choice of U.S. The specific structures of the U.S.-centered international order enable the east-asian countries including China to promote the rapid economic development eve...

    This Study explores the sino-american hegemonic competition and the strategic choice of U.S. The specific structures of the U.S.-centered international order enable the east-asian countries including China to promote the rapid economic development even in short terms. Furthermore, getting on the bandwagon of post-cold war international system, China makes efforts to enhance the comprehensive national capabilities, which would have approached the parity with U.S. approximately within 15 years. This power-shift is dramatically proceeding not only on the east-asian level but also on the global level. Now that the rise of China is not endowed with the democratic system values, but is equipped with exclusive sino-centrism, it possibly collides with the american exceptionalism which has a strong mission to democratize the uncivilized area. Therefore it is not surprising that sino-american hegemonic competition enforces the U.S. to make the strategic choice over the rise of China which could threat both U.S. security and their hegemonic position. Now the Bush administration is pursuing the congagement policy as China-policy, that combined the military containment with economic engagement. However, if China's power would continue to expand while keeping on undemocratic system, the U.S. could not rule out the possibility of the preventive war, that seemingly serves as key instrument for refraining China from ascending the hegemonic position.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-06-20 학술지등록 한글명 : 통일정책연구
    외국어명 : Unification Policy Studies
    KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.39 1.39 1.41
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.78 1.82 2.05 0.39
    더보기
    해외이동버튼