RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기업 사이코패시와 집단책임의 이론 = Corporate Psychopathy and Collective Guilt

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Global financial crisis has arrived, which attacked all the world's economy and made it down. Naturally diverse reflective arguments on economic and legal liberalism have been rising nowadays. They are mainly focused on corporations' pathological pursuit of interests and power. Today, the corporations have risen to dominance in most sectors of our society. To avoid and control the overuse of corporations's power, it is necessary that we should regard them as a psychopathic entity. As a matter of fact, so many psychiatrists and psychologists argued the traits of corporations are very similar to those of psychopathy that even legal scholars also are more and more inclined to take corporate psychopathy into consideration.
      In order to regulate and control the corporation's power and make it not be abused, we need to examine the theory of collective guilt proposed by George P. Fletcher in his famous book the Romantics at War(2002). In his book, Fletcher argued that in some conditions, not only an actor but also the collective entity surrounding or behind him is culpable. For example, Nazi Germany is culpable for pogrom and the Al-Qaeda is also culpable for 9.11. He called this kind of guilt, the collective guilt.
      From his view, we can derive very important conclusions necessary to control appropriately the corporations. In certain conditions, in that the internal cohesion between an actor and the collective entity is strong enough for him to regard himself as the representative of whole entity, the collective entity can be culpable. Similarly, if there are the same conditions between a member of corporations and the corporation itself, the corporation can be culpable. In other words, Fletcher's theory of collective guilt can be applied to reconstruct corporate criminal liability and thus supply us with legal tools that make it possible to treat corporations as criminal actors.
      번역하기

      Global financial crisis has arrived, which attacked all the world's economy and made it down. Naturally diverse reflective arguments on economic and legal liberalism have been rising nowadays. They are mainly focused on corporations' pathological purs...

      Global financial crisis has arrived, which attacked all the world's economy and made it down. Naturally diverse reflective arguments on economic and legal liberalism have been rising nowadays. They are mainly focused on corporations' pathological pursuit of interests and power. Today, the corporations have risen to dominance in most sectors of our society. To avoid and control the overuse of corporations's power, it is necessary that we should regard them as a psychopathic entity. As a matter of fact, so many psychiatrists and psychologists argued the traits of corporations are very similar to those of psychopathy that even legal scholars also are more and more inclined to take corporate psychopathy into consideration.
      In order to regulate and control the corporation's power and make it not be abused, we need to examine the theory of collective guilt proposed by George P. Fletcher in his famous book the Romantics at War(2002). In his book, Fletcher argued that in some conditions, not only an actor but also the collective entity surrounding or behind him is culpable. For example, Nazi Germany is culpable for pogrom and the Al-Qaeda is also culpable for 9.11. He called this kind of guilt, the collective guilt.
      From his view, we can derive very important conclusions necessary to control appropriately the corporations. In certain conditions, in that the internal cohesion between an actor and the collective entity is strong enough for him to regard himself as the representative of whole entity, the collective entity can be culpable. Similarly, if there are the same conditions between a member of corporations and the corporation itself, the corporation can be culpable. In other words, Fletcher's theory of collective guilt can be applied to reconstruct corporate criminal liability and thus supply us with legal tools that make it possible to treat corporations as criminal actors.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신동운, 1998

      2 임웅, 1998

      3 윤영신, "회사지배구조에서 법규제(Legal Rule)와 소프트 로(Soft Law)의 역할 및 관계" 법학연구소 48 (48): 85-104, 2007

      4 이재상, "형법총론" 2006

      5 박상기, "형법총론" 2009

      6 임웅, "형법총론" 2003

      7 오영근, "형법총론" 2005

      8 조병선, "형법에서의 행위자의 특정: 개인책임과 단체책임" 법학연구소 50 (50): 591-614, 2009

      9 송기동, "영미 기업범죄 형사책임의 전개" 한국형사정책학회 20 (20): 41-70, 2008

      10 김일수, "새로 쓴 형법총론 제9판" 2003

      1 신동운, 1998

      2 임웅, 1998

      3 윤영신, "회사지배구조에서 법규제(Legal Rule)와 소프트 로(Soft Law)의 역할 및 관계" 법학연구소 48 (48): 85-104, 2007

      4 이재상, "형법총론" 2006

      5 박상기, "형법총론" 2009

      6 임웅, "형법총론" 2003

      7 오영근, "형법총론" 2005

      8 조병선, "형법에서의 행위자의 특정: 개인책임과 단체책임" 법학연구소 50 (50): 591-614, 2009

      9 송기동, "영미 기업범죄 형사책임의 전개" 한국형사정책학회 20 (20): 41-70, 2008

      10 김일수, "새로 쓴 형법총론 제9판" 2003

      11 안성조, "사이코패스 I - 범죄충동 ․ 원인론 ․ 책임능력 -" 2009

      12 이기헌, "법인의 형사책임에 관한 비교법적 연구" 한국형사정책연구원 1996

      13 조국, "법인의 형사책임과 양벌규정의 법적 성격" 법학연구소 48 (48): 60-76, 2007

      14 이천현, "법인의 범죄주체능력과 형사책임" 22 : 2004

      15 조홍식, "법에서의 가치와 가치판단: 원고적격의의 규범학(Ⅰ)" 법학연구소 48 (48): 160-203, 2007

      16 Viral V. Acharya, "미국발 글로벌 금융위기의 진단과 처방" 교보문고 2009

      17 Rita Carter, "뇌 맵핑마인드" 말글빛냄 2007

      18 김화진, "기업지배구조와 기업금융" 2009

      19 김재봉, "기업에 대한 보호관찰의 도입가능성 검토" 한국비교형사법학회 8 (8): 805-820, 2006

      20 곽관훈, "기업규제의 패러다임전환과 내부통제시스템" 한국경제법학회 8 (8): 27-51, 2009

      21 찰스 P. 킨들버거, "광기, 패닉, 붕괴: 금융위기의 역사" 굿모닝북스 2006

      22 강동범, "경제범죄와 그에 대한 형법적 대응" (7) : 1995

      23 Robert D. Hare, "Without Conscience" The Guilford Press 1999

      24 George P. Fletcher, "The Storrs Lectures: Liberals and Romantics at War: The Problem of Collective Guilt" 111 : 2002

      25 Joel Bakan, "The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power" 2004

      26 Alison Abbott, "Scanning Psychopaths" 13 : 2007

      27 George P. Fletcher, "Romantics at War: Glory and Guilt in the Age of Terrorism" Princeton Univ. Press 2002

      28 William B. Michael, "Romanticizing Guilt" 112 : 2003

      29 Seth F. Kreimer, "Note, Reading the Mind of the School Board: Segregative Intent and the De Facto/De Jure Distinction" 86 : 317-, 1976

      30 "Montague Ullman의 Corporate Psychopathy"

      31 Herbert Morris, "George Fletcher and Collective Guilt: A Critical Commentary on the 2001" 2003

      32 Günter Heine, "Die Strafrechtliche Verantwortlichkeit von Unternehmen" 1995

      33 Martin J. Weinstein, "Criminal Law's Greatest Mystery Thriller: Corporate Guilt through Collective Knowledge" 1994

      34 V.S. Khanna, "Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve?" 109 : 1996

      35 Stoner, "Corporate Criminal Liability for Homicide: Can the Criminal Law Control Corporate Behavior?" 38 : 1985

      36 Ann Foerschler, "Corporate Criminal Intent: Toward A Better Understanding of Corporate Misconduct" 78 : 1990

      37 Keisha A. Gary, "Congressional Proposals to Revive Guilt by Association: An Ineffective Plan to Stop Terrorism" 1994

      38 C. Roxin, "AT, 2.Aufl." 1994

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-12-23 학회명변경 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute KCI등재
      2014-12-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.97 0.97 0.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.69 0.856 0.38
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼