RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    직능이냐 산업이냐 : 프랑스 건축노동자들의 노조 정체성 연구 ( 1907 - 1914 ) = Craft or Industry ? : A Study on the Union Identity of the French Construction Workers ( 1907 - 1914 )

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3060757

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    C.G.T., the french General Confederation of Labor, announced the Charter of Amiens(1906) that it would accept industrial federations only and not craft federations, and worked for the restructuring of labor organizations with a basis on such industrial unionism. Until 1914, C.G.T. went through intensified internal struggles around the two principles of craft unionism and industrial unionism. The majority of local labor unions remained as craft unions in spite of the incessant persuasion of their federal council while industrial unionism successfully settled down in a level of federation. Especially in big cities where strikes and labor disputes occurred frequently, craft unions played a great influence. In Paris, for example, showroom of various crafts and center of labor movement, by the beginning of 1914, 36 craft unions survived in the field of construction industry; variety of crafts never died away. Until the same year, they demonstrated their strong solidarity in a series of strikes, including the Paris general strike of construction workers in 1911. This shows that the separation of labor organizations according to craft-based identities does not necessarily weaken their power of class struggle. In short, the most remarkable characteristic of C.G.T. of the time, especially of the Construction Federation, was such a dual structure, craft organization at the level of local union and industrial organization at the level of federation. Craft unionism fought well against industrial unionism whose cause was the elevation of a revolutionary spirit by means of the unification of labor movements in conforming to the change of the economic conditions. To the workers of the time, this shows, crafts were not just the manifestation of mere professional profit and closeness but the foundation of communities which sustained their identity even in the time of full economic transformation. Considering Revolutionary Syndicalism of C.G.T. of the time, therefore, in the aspect of its structural base, one can see that the mainspring of labor movement was craft unionism, not industrial unionism as it is generally said.(Seoul National University)
    번역하기

    C.G.T., the french General Confederation of Labor, announced the Charter of Amiens(1906) that it would accept industrial federations only and not craft federations, and worked for the restructuring of labor organizations with a basis on such industria...

    C.G.T., the french General Confederation of Labor, announced the Charter of Amiens(1906) that it would accept industrial federations only and not craft federations, and worked for the restructuring of labor organizations with a basis on such industrial unionism. Until 1914, C.G.T. went through intensified internal struggles around the two principles of craft unionism and industrial unionism. The majority of local labor unions remained as craft unions in spite of the incessant persuasion of their federal council while industrial unionism successfully settled down in a level of federation. Especially in big cities where strikes and labor disputes occurred frequently, craft unions played a great influence. In Paris, for example, showroom of various crafts and center of labor movement, by the beginning of 1914, 36 craft unions survived in the field of construction industry; variety of crafts never died away. Until the same year, they demonstrated their strong solidarity in a series of strikes, including the Paris general strike of construction workers in 1911. This shows that the separation of labor organizations according to craft-based identities does not necessarily weaken their power of class struggle. In short, the most remarkable characteristic of C.G.T. of the time, especially of the Construction Federation, was such a dual structure, craft organization at the level of local union and industrial organization at the level of federation. Craft unionism fought well against industrial unionism whose cause was the elevation of a revolutionary spirit by means of the unification of labor movements in conforming to the change of the economic conditions. To the workers of the time, this shows, crafts were not just the manifestation of mere professional profit and closeness but the foundation of communities which sustained their identity even in the time of full economic transformation. Considering Revolutionary Syndicalism of C.G.T. of the time, therefore, in the aspect of its structural base, one can see that the mainspring of labor movement was craft unionism, not industrial unionism as it is generally said.(Seoul National University)

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼