RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Preprint acceptance policies of Asian academic society journals in 2020

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107340757

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose In the current era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the trend of sharing new research results through preprint platforms is receiving more attention from researchers than ever before. Preprints have been recognized as a primary and ...

      Purpose

      In the current era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the trend of sharing new research results through preprint platforms is receiving more attention from researchers than ever before. Preprints have been recognized as a primary and essential method to disseminate new findings faster than traditional publications. Therefore, it has become necessary for journals and editors to acknowledge these changes, prepare preprint policies, and notify authors accordingly. This study aimed to review the status of preprint policies of international publishers and Asian academic society journals.








      Methods

      In total, 383 Asian academic society journals registered in Science Citation Index Expanded were selected as a dataset for analysis between December 11, 2020 and January 8, 2021. Three different parameters were investigated whether each journal had a preprint policy, whether journals allowed preprint manuscripts to be submitted, and whether preprint articles were allowed to be included in the references.








      Results

      Among the 383 Asian academic society journals from 22 countries, only 28 journals accepted preprint manuscripts, and eight allowed the use of preprint manuscripts as references. Japan had the most journals that both had preprint policies and accepted preprint manuscripts, with 13 journals, followed by Korea with 10 journals.








      Conclusion

      Despite the limitations of this study, the results show that editors and journal staff should understand the current preprint trend and try to prepare preprint policies that best meet the journals’ and authors’ interests.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose In the current era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the trend of sharing new research results through preprint platforms is receiving more attention from researchers than ever before. Preprints have been recognized as a primary and e...

      Purpose

      In the current era of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the trend of sharing new research results through preprint platforms is receiving more attention from researchers than ever before. Preprints have been recognized as a primary and essential method to disseminate new findings faster than traditional publications. Therefore, it has become necessary for journals and editors to acknowledge these changes, prepare preprint policies, and notify authors accordingly. This study aimed to review the status of preprint policies of international publishers and Asian academic society journals.




      Methods

      In total, 383 Asian academic society journals registered in Science Citation Index Expanded were selected as a dataset for analysis between December 11, 2020 and January 8, 2021. Three different parameters were investigated whether each journal had a preprint policy, whether journals allowed preprint manuscripts to be submitted, and whether preprint articles were allowed to be included in the references.




      Results

      Among the 383 Asian academic society journals from 22 countries, only 28 journals accepted preprint manuscripts, and eight allowed the use of preprint manuscripts as references. Japan had the most journals that both had preprint policies and accepted preprint manuscripts, with 13 journals, followed by Korea with 10 journals.




      Conclusion

      Despite the limitations of this study, the results show that editors and journal staff should understand the current preprint trend and try to prepare preprint policies that best meet the journals’ and authors’ interests.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Mudrak B, "What are preprints, and how do they benefit authors?" American Journal Experts

      2 Quan-Hoang Vuong, "The rise of preprints and their value in social sciences and humanities" 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 7 (7): 70-72, 2020

      3 Kirkham JJ, "Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting" 10 : e041849-, 2020

      4 Sherpa Romeo, "Suggest a new publisher policy" Sherpa Romeo

      5 Committee on Publication Ethics, "Preprints" Committee on Publication Ethics

      6 Kim KH, "Preprint status: focusing on science and engineering" 2020

      7 Cho HM, "Preprint status: focusing on publisher and megajournal" 2020

      8 Kim JH, "Preprint research trend" 2020

      9 Klebel T, "Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals" 15 : e0239518-, 2020

      10 Yoon CH, "Major preprint issues" 2020

      1 Mudrak B, "What are preprints, and how do they benefit authors?" American Journal Experts

      2 Quan-Hoang Vuong, "The rise of preprints and their value in social sciences and humanities" 한국과학학술지편집인협의회 7 (7): 70-72, 2020

      3 Kirkham JJ, "Systematic examination of preprint platforms for use in the medical and biomedical sciences setting" 10 : e041849-, 2020

      4 Sherpa Romeo, "Suggest a new publisher policy" Sherpa Romeo

      5 Committee on Publication Ethics, "Preprints" Committee on Publication Ethics

      6 Kim KH, "Preprint status: focusing on science and engineering" 2020

      7 Cho HM, "Preprint status: focusing on publisher and megajournal" 2020

      8 Kim JH, "Preprint research trend" 2020

      9 Klebel T, "Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals" 15 : e0239518-, 2020

      10 Yoon CH, "Major preprint issues" 2020

      11 Heuer RD, "Innovation in scholarly communication: vision and projects from high-energy physics" 28 : 83-96, 2008

      12 Jackson A, "How COVID-19 is changing research culture" Digital Science

      13 Massey DS, "Assessment of preprint policies of top-ranked clinical journals" 3 : e2011127-, 2020

      14 Serghiou S, "Altmetric scores, citations, and publication of studies posted as preprints" 319 : 402-404, 2018

      15 Chiarelli A, "Accelerating scholarly communication: the transformative role of preprints" Zenodo

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2018-01-30 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Coucil of Science of Editors -> Korean Council of Science Editors KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼