Simultaneous removal of NOx and SO2 using two-stage O3 oxidation combined with Ca(OH)2 absorption

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper proposes two-stage O3 oxidation combined with Ca(OH)2 for simultaneous removal of NOx and SO2 (NOx: Nitrogen oxides including NO, NO2 and N2O5). In two-stage oxidation, NO was first oxidized to NO2 in an oxidation tube, and NO2 was further oxidized into N2O5 in the spray tower. NOx and SO2 were simultaneously removed in the spray tower. This method can effectively reduce the extra waste of O3 caused by the decomposition of N2O5, especially at high temperature. Effects of various factors on denitrification efficiency were investigated. The results showed that the NOx removal efficiency decreased and O3 extra consumption ratio increased with the increase of oxidation temperature or oxidation reaction time. When the O3/NO molar ratio was 1.8, one-stage O3 oxidation at 150 oC extra wasted 33.3% of O3. With the increase of O3 concentration at site 2, the NOx removal efficiency first increased and then stabilized. Compared with the one-stage O3 oxidation-absorption, the two-stage oxidation-absorption improved NOx removal efficiency from 62.5% to 89%. In addition, the increase of CaSO3 slurry concentration had little effect on the denitrification efficiency.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Y. G. Adewuyi, 304 : 793-, 2016

2 J. Chen, 113 : 87-, 2016

3 J. Ding, 243 : 176-, 2014

4 Y. Liu, 92 : 1907-, 2014

5 R. Hao, 365 : 282-, 2019

6 C. Sun, 29 : 3276-, 2015

7 Q. Ma, 30 : 2302-, 2016

8 K. Skalska, 64 : 269-, 2010

9 S. Zhou, 55 : 5825-, 2016

10 Z. Wang, 26 : 5583-, 2012

11 Y. Xing, 25 : 6456-, 2018

12 N. Tang, 160 : 145-, 2010

13 Q. Wu, 341 : 157-, 2018

14 Z. Wang, 88 : 817-, 2007

15 Y. Zou, 4 : 21091-, 2019

16 C. Sun, 274 : 376-, 2014

17 R. Ji, 57 : 14440-, 2018

18 F. Lin, 30 : 5101-, 2016

19 G. Chen, 49 : 12140-, 2010

20 D. Littlejohn, 27 : 2162-, 1993

21 V. Ramanathan, 43 : 37-, 2009

22 K. Li, 192 : 38-, 2017

23 W. Chen, 9 : 90-, 2019

24 W. Chen, 439 : 75-, 2018

25 J. Li, 175 : 147-, 2011

26 J. Yu, 95 : 160-, 2010

27 Z. Li, 82 : 55-, 2016

28 Y. Li, 32 : 35-, 2017

29 J. P. S. Sousa, 176 : 383-, 2011

30 W. J. Zhang, 83 : 63-, 2008

31 W. -J. Zhang, 47 : 4358-, 2008

32 W. Y. Sun, 192 : 124-, 2011

33 K. Skalska, 61 : 69-, 2012

34 J. Zhang, 53 : 6450-, 2014

35 K. Skalska, 66 : 3386-, 2011

36 J. V. Durme, 78 : 324-, 2008

37 K. Skalska, 408 : 3976-, 2010

38 Z. Han, 31 : 3047-, 2017

39 P. Fang, 106 : 645-, 2013

40 H. Chu, 275 : 127-, 2001

41 Y. Zhao, 137 : 8-, 2015

42 Y. Zhao, 128 : 54-, 2014

43 R. Hao, 368 : 234-, 2019

44 H. W. Park, 285 : 117-, 2015

45 C. V. Raghunath, 314 : 537-, 2017

46 C. V. Raghunath, 11 : 88-, 2016

47 Y. G. Adewuyi, 281 : 575-, 2015