In the late Goryeo period, especially after Yuan intervention period, Goryeo’s priests had ‘Saho(a title bestowed to a priest)’ along with its own priest ranks. ‘Saho’ was used based on the addition of Buddhist name to the appellation ‘Dae...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102102522
2016
Korean
900
KCI등재
학술저널
149-173(25쪽)
2
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In the late Goryeo period, especially after Yuan intervention period, Goryeo’s priests had ‘Saho(a title bestowed to a priest)’ along with its own priest ranks. ‘Saho’ was used based on the addition of Buddhist name to the appellation ‘Dae...
In the late Goryeo period, especially after Yuan intervention period, Goryeo’s priests had ‘Saho(a title bestowed to a priest)’ along with its own priest ranks. ‘Saho’ was used based on the addition of Buddhist name to the appellation ‘Daesa(Great Masster)’, and it was also called ‘Sasaho(賜師號)’, which means giving Saho. ‘Saja(賜紫, to be awarded a purple robe)’ or ‘Sajasamun(賜紫沙門, Samun means a Buddhist monk)’ used in the early Goryeo period and ‘Saho’ or ‘Sasaho’ in the late Goryeo period were introduced from China. So, they were at first used as the title of priests who carried out international exchanges. ‘Saja’ was used a lot in the early Goryeo period, because it was used in place of ‘Saho’ not distinguished from Daesa, which was one of the priest ranks. There were examples where priest ranks were given to foreign priests in the early Goryeo period. As priest ranks were valued in Goryeo, it was rare to use ‘Saho’ not distinguished from Daesa, which was one of the priest ranks. However, since entering Yuan intervention period, ‘Saho’ was actively used in Goryeo amid exchanges between Goryeo and Yuan. Besides, it can be understood that as ‘Saho’ was given after ‘Saja’ by China, ‘Saho’ was relatively highly valued and preferred. Most of those who held ‘Saho’ title belonged to The Yuga Sect. It can be interpreted that The Yuga Sect used ‘Saho’ actively because it contacted and exchanged with Yuan before any other religious sects. Further, the status of Goryeo’s priest ranks was weakened in the relations with Yuan, while ‘Saho’, which was used in common with Yuan, was preferred and increasingly used.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 姜好鮮, "충렬·충선왕대 臨濟宗 수용과 고려불교의 변화" 46 : 2001
2 이익주, "이색의 삶과 생각" 일조각 2013
3 이정훈, "고려후기 승려에 대한 봉군(封君)과 그 의미" 한국역사연구회 (80) : 93-121, 2011
4 許興植, "高麗時代의 國師, 王師制度와 그 機能" 67 : 1975
5 吉熙星, "高麗時代의 僧階制度에 對하여-特히 高麗圖經을 中心하여-" 7 : 1983
6 朴胤珍, "高麗時代 王師·國師 研究" 景仁文化社 2006
7 邊東明, "高麗後期의 法相宗" 한국중세사학회 12 : 181-224, 2002
8 박윤진, "高麗前期 ‘賜紫沙門’의 의미와 역할" 한국역사민속학회 (49) : 152-180, 2015
9 박윤진, "高麗初 高僧의 大師 追封" 고려사학회 14 : 1-40, 2003
10 崔柄憲, "高麗佛敎史研究" 일조각 1986
1 姜好鮮, "충렬·충선왕대 臨濟宗 수용과 고려불교의 변화" 46 : 2001
2 이익주, "이색의 삶과 생각" 일조각 2013
3 이정훈, "고려후기 승려에 대한 봉군(封君)과 그 의미" 한국역사연구회 (80) : 93-121, 2011
4 許興植, "高麗時代의 國師, 王師制度와 그 機能" 67 : 1975
5 吉熙星, "高麗時代의 僧階制度에 對하여-特히 高麗圖經을 中心하여-" 7 : 1983
6 朴胤珍, "高麗時代 王師·國師 研究" 景仁文化社 2006
7 邊東明, "高麗後期의 法相宗" 한국중세사학회 12 : 181-224, 2002
8 박윤진, "高麗前期 ‘賜紫沙門’의 의미와 역할" 한국역사민속학회 (49) : 152-180, 2015
9 박윤진, "高麗初 高僧의 大師 追封" 고려사학회 14 : 1-40, 2003
10 崔柄憲, "高麗佛敎史研究" 일조각 1986
11 崔柄憲, "高麗佛敎史研究" 一潮閣 1986
12 金胤知, "高麗 光宗代 僧階制의 시행과 佛敎界의 재편" 고려대학교 2015
13 崔柄憲, "韓祐劢博士停年紀念史學論叢" 지식산업사 1981
14 崔柄憲, "金哲唆博士華甲紀念史學論叢" 지식산업사 1983
15 白文固, "金代官賣寺觀名額和僧道官政策探求" (1) : 2002
16 王德朋, "金代僧尼名號探祈" (7) : 2014
17 郭學勤, "論北宋佛道ニ敎管理制度" 1 : 2013
18 朴鎔辰, "義天 그의 생애와 사상" 혜안 2011
19 鄭修芽, "李基白先生古稀紀念 韓國史學論叢 상" 一潮閣 1994
20 汪聖鐸, "宋代政敎關係研究" 人民出版社 2010
일본차기학습지도요령에서 ‘역사종합’의 신설과 역사교육 개혁
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2019-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
1999-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1 | 1 | 0.94 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.94 | 0.96 | 1.598 | 0.59 |