RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      황제권 중심 국민국가체제의 수립과 좌절(1895 ~ 1904)_preprint

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=G3806153

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper is to examine the nation-state building in Korean modern history focusing on the sovereign power. Most researches has often regarded the sovereign power as an obstacle to nation-state building. But as Korean history has maintained several centralized dynasties for fifteen centuries and more, the sovereign of Korea after the Kabo Reform could function as a powerful centripetal force in nation-state building based on that ""proto-nationalistic"" loyalty.
      lnitially, the principles of state building introduced in the Kabo Reform was to restrict the sovereign power to the extreme and create a new type of homogeneous people that were supposed to be loyal to the sovereign and patriotic to the state at the Same time. For that purpose, several projects were carried out: the establishment and proclamation of independent state power, the restriction of the sovereign power and introduction of a cabinet system, the abolishment of status system, publishment of newspapers, population census, and so forth.
      As the extreme restriction of the sovereign power endangered the privileged status of the Enlightenment Group members into danger, they could not but restore the sovereign power in nation-state building after the King's flight to Russian Legation in February, 1896. Hence, it happened that the leading group of the Independence Club pursued a constitutional monarchy, while the Emperor an absolute monarchy. The desire of the Independence Club, however, broke down, as it was disorganized by the Emperor's Guards.
      The policies of sovereign power build-up after 1899 brought a Korean-version of ""Bonapartism"" into existence. But, it frustrated the nation-state building project because it reduced the sovereign power into a private dimension, as the political and social power group exploited and suppressed the people. Hence, it created a ""subject"" which had only an obligation of loyalty and obedience without the rights to life and property, so that it was only natural that Korean people failed to unite as a nation in protest against the Japan's invasion. After the Russo-Japanese war, as a corollary, some crucial agendas of several politica1 groups that asserted the constitutional monarchy, ""spouted"" from the desire to deny this sovereign power.
      번역하기

      This paper is to examine the nation-state building in Korean modern history focusing on the sovereign power. Most researches has often regarded the sovereign power as an obstacle to nation-state building. But as Korean history has maintained several c...

      This paper is to examine the nation-state building in Korean modern history focusing on the sovereign power. Most researches has often regarded the sovereign power as an obstacle to nation-state building. But as Korean history has maintained several centralized dynasties for fifteen centuries and more, the sovereign of Korea after the Kabo Reform could function as a powerful centripetal force in nation-state building based on that ""proto-nationalistic"" loyalty.
      lnitially, the principles of state building introduced in the Kabo Reform was to restrict the sovereign power to the extreme and create a new type of homogeneous people that were supposed to be loyal to the sovereign and patriotic to the state at the Same time. For that purpose, several projects were carried out: the establishment and proclamation of independent state power, the restriction of the sovereign power and introduction of a cabinet system, the abolishment of status system, publishment of newspapers, population census, and so forth.
      As the extreme restriction of the sovereign power endangered the privileged status of the Enlightenment Group members into danger, they could not but restore the sovereign power in nation-state building after the King's flight to Russian Legation in February, 1896. Hence, it happened that the leading group of the Independence Club pursued a constitutional monarchy, while the Emperor an absolute monarchy. The desire of the Independence Club, however, broke down, as it was disorganized by the Emperor's Guards.
      The policies of sovereign power build-up after 1899 brought a Korean-version of ""Bonapartism"" into existence. But, it frustrated the nation-state building project because it reduced the sovereign power into a private dimension, as the political and social power group exploited and suppressed the people. Hence, it created a ""subject"" which had only an obligation of loyalty and obedience without the rights to life and property, so that it was only natural that Korean people failed to unite as a nation in protest against the Japan's invasion. After the Russo-Japanese war, as a corollary, some crucial agendas of several politica1 groups that asserted the constitutional monarchy, ""spouted"" from the desire to deny this sovereign power.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      위의 학술논문정보원과 초록의 내용은 본 논문의 실제 출판 논문인 황제권 중심 국민국가체제의 수립과 좌절(1895~1904) : A Study of the Sovereign Power between 1895 and 1904 = The Establishment and Collapse of Nation-state in Korea의 정보임.
      번역하기

      위의 학술논문정보원과 초록의 내용은 본 논문의 실제 출판 논문인 황제권 중심 국민국가체제의 수립과 좌절(1895~1904) : A Study of the Sovereign Power between 1895 and 1904 = The Establishment and Collapse of Nat...

      위의 학술논문정보원과 초록의 내용은 본 논문의 실제 출판 논문인 황제권 중심 국민국가체제의 수립과 좌절(1895~1904) : A Study of the Sovereign Power between 1895 and 1904 = The Establishment and Collapse of Nation-state in Korea의 정보임.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      머리말
      1. 국민국가 체제의 도입과 왕권의 위축
      2. 입헌군주제와 전제군주제 구상간의 갈등
      1) 갑오개혁의 제한적 계승과 독립협회의 ‘국민 만들기’
      2) 황제권의 위상을 둘러싼 갈등
      3. 전제군주제의 성립과 국민국가 구상의 좌절
      1) 전제군주제의 성립
      2) 황제권 강화의 한계와 국민국가 구상의 좌절
      맺음말
      번역하기

      머리말 1. 국민국가 체제의 도입과 왕권의 위축 2. 입헌군주제와 전제군주제 구상간의 갈등 1) 갑오개혁의 제한적 계승과 독립협회의 ‘국민 만들기’ 2) 황제권의 위상...

      머리말
      1. 국민국가 체제의 도입과 왕권의 위축
      2. 입헌군주제와 전제군주제 구상간의 갈등
      1) 갑오개혁의 제한적 계승과 독립협회의 ‘국민 만들기’
      2) 황제권의 위상을 둘러싼 갈등
      3. 전제군주제의 성립과 국민국가 구상의 좌절
      1) 전제군주제의 성립
      2) 황제권 강화의 한계와 국민국가 구상의 좌절
      맺음말

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼