RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      관광활동과 웰빙지각과의 관계(한ㆍ중비교)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75221077

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      A leisure activity is essential to happiness. David & Junaida(2004) have reported that the desire that can be satisfied by a tourism activity, a leisure activity which is the result of psychological essence of desiring a tour, and a vacation as an experience affect positively to improve individuals happiness, On the bases of their report, this study attempted to see the relationships of sense of well-being through the extent of going on a tour (frequency and period) and the differences between nations. (Korea and China)
      I defined sense of well-being as a sum of subjectively aware positive cognical and emotional status and measured it of the three factors of subjective well-being, the life satisfaction, the positive affect, the negative affect.
      According to the result of my study the extent of touring(frequency and period) is related positively with the five factors except the relationship between the period and positive affect of sense of well-being. The frequency and period in negative affects showed differences between nations but no differences in positive affect. There were differences in the period factor bur no differences in the frequency factor of life satisfaction. A following study on the differences of touring activities of the well-being awareness between nations is seemed to be necessary. I also like to indicate the limit of collecting references. This study is significant of attempting to analyze the differences of the well-being awareness between nations.
      번역하기

      A leisure activity is essential to happiness. David & Junaida(2004) have reported that the desire that can be satisfied by a tourism activity, a leisure activity which is the result of psychological essence of desiring a tour, and a vacation as an ex...

      A leisure activity is essential to happiness. David & Junaida(2004) have reported that the desire that can be satisfied by a tourism activity, a leisure activity which is the result of psychological essence of desiring a tour, and a vacation as an experience affect positively to improve individuals happiness, On the bases of their report, this study attempted to see the relationships of sense of well-being through the extent of going on a tour (frequency and period) and the differences between nations. (Korea and China)
      I defined sense of well-being as a sum of subjectively aware positive cognical and emotional status and measured it of the three factors of subjective well-being, the life satisfaction, the positive affect, the negative affect.
      According to the result of my study the extent of touring(frequency and period) is related positively with the five factors except the relationship between the period and positive affect of sense of well-being. The frequency and period in negative affects showed differences between nations but no differences in positive affect. There were differences in the period factor bur no differences in the frequency factor of life satisfaction. A following study on the differences of touring activities of the well-being awareness between nations is seemed to be necessary. I also like to indicate the limit of collecting references. This study is significant of attempting to analyze the differences of the well-being awareness between nations.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
      • 1. 관광활동
      • 2. well-being
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 설계
      • Ⅰ. 서론
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰
      • 1. 관광활동
      • 2. well-being
      • Ⅲ. 연구의 설계
      • 1. 연구모형 및 가설설정
      • 2. 변수의 조작적 정의
      • 3. 조사 및 분석방법
      • Ⅳ. 실증분석
      • 1. 표본의 인구통계적 특성
      • 2. 요인분석과 신뢰도분석
      • 3. 가설검증
      • Ⅴ. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼