RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      시대적으로 바라본 마음과 몸의 수사학 : (편)두통의 사례 = History of Rhetoric in Mind and Body Relationship : Case of Migraine and Headache

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101693713

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The relationship of mind and body has stimulated extensive discussion for a long time. However, answers are ambigous and not forthcoming yet. Meanwhile, after the western medicine had embraced materialistic paradigm, conditions which cannot be substantiated by organic change were pushed out to periphery under the banner of "Medically Unexplained Symptoms". Medical experts endeavored to understand these mysterious illnesses based on the mind-body relationship and provided a frame of interpretation called Psychosomatic Medicine. This frame of interpretation had influenced not only the communication practice but also the health-seeking behavior and even the subjective experience of patients regarding their illnesses. The frame of interpretation had been drastically changed many times keeping pace with the socio-economic situation and the new scientific discoveries. Accordingly, body or mind was given differential importance by medical experts. For instance, when treatment modalities were lacking, mind was given excessive importance and patients were blamed for their unconscious motives, characterological weaknesses and for their lack of responsibility. In contrast, after the discovery of effective drug, mind was given no more attention and patients were no longer blamed for their contribution to suffering. In this paper, the historical change of the frame of interpretation for understanding migraine and headache was presented as an example. By this, it can be demonstrated how the frame of interpretation has modified the subjective experience of patients, and how the patients' responsibilities were viewed differently. This observation can help to realize the enormous influence of the frame of interpretation provided by medical experts.
      번역하기

      The relationship of mind and body has stimulated extensive discussion for a long time. However, answers are ambigous and not forthcoming yet. Meanwhile, after the western medicine had embraced materialistic paradigm, conditions which cannot be substan...

      The relationship of mind and body has stimulated extensive discussion for a long time. However, answers are ambigous and not forthcoming yet. Meanwhile, after the western medicine had embraced materialistic paradigm, conditions which cannot be substantiated by organic change were pushed out to periphery under the banner of "Medically Unexplained Symptoms". Medical experts endeavored to understand these mysterious illnesses based on the mind-body relationship and provided a frame of interpretation called Psychosomatic Medicine. This frame of interpretation had influenced not only the communication practice but also the health-seeking behavior and even the subjective experience of patients regarding their illnesses. The frame of interpretation had been drastically changed many times keeping pace with the socio-economic situation and the new scientific discoveries. Accordingly, body or mind was given differential importance by medical experts. For instance, when treatment modalities were lacking, mind was given excessive importance and patients were blamed for their unconscious motives, characterological weaknesses and for their lack of responsibility. In contrast, after the discovery of effective drug, mind was given no more attention and patients were no longer blamed for their contribution to suffering. In this paper, the historical change of the frame of interpretation for understanding migraine and headache was presented as an example. By this, it can be demonstrated how the frame of interpretation has modified the subjective experience of patients, and how the patients' responsibilities were viewed differently. This observation can help to realize the enormous influence of the frame of interpretation provided by medical experts.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Stora JB, "When the Body Displaces the Mind: Stress, Trauma and Somatic" Karnac Books 2007

      2 Peters S, "What do patients choose to tell their doctors? Qualitative analysis of potential barriers to reattributing medically unexplained symptoms" 24 : 443-449, 2009

      3 Friedman M, "Type A Behavior Pattern: its association with coronary heart disease" 3 : 300-312, 1971

      4 Martin D, "The rest cure revisited" 164 : 737-738, 2007

      5 Williams GH, "The determinants of health: structure, context and agency" 25 : 131-154, 2003

      6 Helmes E, "The construct of alexithymia: associations with defense mechanisms" 64 : 318-331, 2008

      7 Tepper SJ, "Telcagepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist for the treatment of migraine" 10 : 711-720, 2009

      8 Dolan B, "Soul searching: a brief history of the mind/body debate in the neurosciences" 23 : E2-, 2007

      9 Harley D, "Rhetoric and the social construction of sickness and healing" 12 : 407-435, 1999

      10 Nater UM, "Recent trends in behavioral medicine" 19 : 180-183, 2006

      1 Stora JB, "When the Body Displaces the Mind: Stress, Trauma and Somatic" Karnac Books 2007

      2 Peters S, "What do patients choose to tell their doctors? Qualitative analysis of potential barriers to reattributing medically unexplained symptoms" 24 : 443-449, 2009

      3 Friedman M, "Type A Behavior Pattern: its association with coronary heart disease" 3 : 300-312, 1971

      4 Martin D, "The rest cure revisited" 164 : 737-738, 2007

      5 Williams GH, "The determinants of health: structure, context and agency" 25 : 131-154, 2003

      6 Helmes E, "The construct of alexithymia: associations with defense mechanisms" 64 : 318-331, 2008

      7 Tepper SJ, "Telcagepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonist for the treatment of migraine" 10 : 711-720, 2009

      8 Dolan B, "Soul searching: a brief history of the mind/body debate in the neurosciences" 23 : E2-, 2007

      9 Harley D, "Rhetoric and the social construction of sickness and healing" 12 : 407-435, 1999

      10 Nater UM, "Recent trends in behavioral medicine" 19 : 180-183, 2006

      11 Hunter RA, "Psychotherapy in migraine" 1 : 1084-1088, 1960

      12 Alexander F, "Psychosomatic medicine, its principles and applications: With a chapter on The functions of the sexual apparatus and their disturbances" Norton 1950

      13 Davis RE, "Personality traits, personality disorders, and migraine: a review" 34 (34): S7-S10, 2013

      14 Brandt J, "Personality and emotional disorder in a community sample of migraine headache sufferers" 147 : 303-308, 1990

      15 Deutsch F, "On the mysterious leap from the mind to the body:a workshop study on the theory of conversion" International Universities Press 1959

      16 Kempner J, "Not Tonight: Migraine and the Politics of Gender and Health" University of Chicago Press 2014

      17 Preston JL, "Neuroscience and the soul: competing explanations for the human experience" 127 : 31-37, 2013

      18 Maxwell H, "Migraine: Background and Treatment" Wright 1966

      19 Silberstein SD, "Migraine genetics: Part II" 53 : 1218-1229, 2013

      20 Rasmussen BK, "Migraine and tension-type headache in a general population: psychosocial factors" 21 : 1138-1143, 1992

      21 Daniel BT, "Migraine" AuthorHouse 2010

      22 Sontag S, "Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and Its Metaphors" Penguin UK 2013

      23 Furst LR, "Idioms of Distress: Psychosomatic Disorders in Medical and Imaginative Literature" SUNY Press 2012

      24 Torelli P, "Human psyche and headache: tension-type headache" 29 (29): S93-S95, 2008

      25 Segal JZ, "Health and the Rhetoric of Medicine" SIU Press 2008

      26 Eadie MJ, "Headache: Through the Centuries" Oxford University Press 2012

      27 Wolff HG, "Headache and Other Head Pain" Oxford University Press 1980

      28 Jindal RD, "Grand challenges in psychosomatic research" 1 : 131-, 2010

      29 van Ravenzwaaij J, "Explanatory models of medically unexplained symptoms: a qualitative analysis of the literature" 7 : 223-231, 2010

      30 Jensen R, "Epidemiology and comorbidity of headache" 7 : 354-361, 2008

      31 Yücel B, "Depression, automatic thoughts, alexithymia, and assertiveness in patients with tension-type headache" 42 : 194-199, 2002

      32 Taylor RE, "Death of neurasthenia and its psychological reincarnation:a study of neurasthenia at the National Hospital for the Relief and Cure of the Paralysed and Epileptic, Queen Square, London, 1870-1932" 179 : 550-557, 2001

      33 Koehler PJ, "Brown-Séquard’s comment on Du Bois-Reymond’s “hemikrania sympathicotonica”" 15 : 370-372, 1995

      34 Andrews A, "Autoimmune Illness as a Death-drive: An Autobiography of Defence" 44 : 189-203, 2011

      35 Koehler PJ, "A history of non-drug treatment in headache, particularly migraine" 133 : 2489-2500, 2010

      36 Gross CG, "A Hole in the Head: More Tales in the History of Neuroscience" MIT Press 2012

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.27 0.444 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼