문화융성과 국어교육 정책 -문화융성과 국어교육의 관계 지형 모색하기- = Cultural Prosperity and Korean Policy of Korean Language Education

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper is aimed at discussing what reciprocity cultural prosperity and Korean language education have and what status cultural prosperity and Korean language education should pursue. Korean language education deals with the cultural contents directly and indirectly in its curriculum. It`s because people can naturally familiarize themselves with culture-related contents, such as norm, ideological value, tradition, institution, symbol, cultural asset, narrative, media living culture and art, etc through language life and literary text experience. Korean language education is the subject cultivating communicative competency. Communication has a close association with culture. The relationship between culture and communication has three dimensions. The three dimensions include the very 1) a dimension in which culture becomes the content of communication 2) a dimension in which culture becomes the form of communication 3) a dimension in which culture becomes a means of communication. By the way, Korean language education interrelates with these three dimensions. Accordingly, Korean language education must design with much more importance to 1) the ability to interpret, 2) ability to utilize genres, 3) media communication competence as a sender/addressee, etc. in order to foster learners` cultural competence. The Korean language education policy for cultural prosperity is required to intensify cultural education research & practice in both sides of Korean language education research and practice. Particularly, Korean language education policy is also required to reinforce educational contents which contribute to cultural communication between generations. In addition, it`s necessary that the same policy should cultivate the competency in putting language culture into practice in actual life by more enhancing the reciprocity between the three areas, language skill, grammar, and literature through the curriculum innovation. This means Korean language education should evolve ecologically. To achieve this, Korean language education has no choice but to expand its extension and to widen its possibility of fusing with other areas.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박인기, "한국인의 말 한국인의 문화" 학지사 2009

2 류제헌, "한국문화지리" 살림 2002

3 이어령, "한국문화상징사전" 동아출판사 3-5, 1992

4 박인기, "한·중 초등국어교과서 비교" 320-338, 2013

5 김규훈, "텍스트 중심 문법교육의 내용 구성 연구 : 생태학 기반의 사회문화적 소통을 근간으로" 동국대학교 2014

6 강세현, "청소년문화론" 양서원 2011

7 Winner, E., "예술심리학" 학지사 1982

8 박인기, "세대 간 소통을 위한 국어생활 교육 방안 -소통적 인간과 대화적 사회를 위한 교육과정 혁신-" 국어국문학회 (164) : 129-159, 2013

9 Jett-Simpson, M., "생태학적 문식성 평가" 한국문화사 1997

10 최상덕, "미래 인재 양성을 위한 핵심역량 교육 및 혁신적 학습생태 구축" 한국교육개발원 2013

11 아야베 쓰네오, "문화를 보는 열다섯 이론" 인간사랑 1984

12 Smith, P, "문화 이론-사회학적 접근" 이학사 2001

13 구인환, "문학교육론(6판)" 삼지원 2012

14 박인기, "문식성교육연구" 한국문식성교육연구회 78-98, 2008

15 박인기, "독서문화의 형성과 비평의 작용" 한국독서학회 (24) : 8-48, 2010

16 박인기, "국어교육학과 인문학적 상상력" 국어국문학회 (147) : 5-28, 2007

17 이홍우, "교육의 목적과 난점(5판)" 교육과학사 1992

18 박인기, "교과교육과 문화, 어떻게 소통할 것인가." 지식과교양 2011

19 박인기, "‘욕설언어현상’에 대한 교육적․문화적 진단과 대안 모색" 한국화법학회 (20) : 101-139, 2012

20 Gollnick, D. M., "Multicultural Education in a Pluralistic Society(9th ed)" Pearson 2013

21 Lum, D., "Cultural Competence, Practice Stages, and Client Systems" Thomson Brooks/Cole 2005