장애유아 통합보육에 대한 학부모인식에 관한 연구 : 서울시 구립어린이집 학부모를 중심으로 = A Study on Parents' Perception of the Desegregated Childcare for Healthy and Handicapped Children : Focused on the Public Childcare Centers operated by Ward Administrations in Seoul

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to survey parents' perception of the desegregated childcare for healthy and handicapped children. For this purpose, preceding studies and relevant literature were reviewed, and thereupon, parents were surveyed to analyze their perception of desegregated childcare and address the problems and thereby, suggest their solutions.
To this end, a total of 269 parents were sampled to be subject to a questionnaire survey: 55 parents whose children were taken care of by the desegregated childcare centers, and 214 parents whose children were cared for by the private childcare facilities. The questionnaire consisted of five areas: understanding and accommodation of the desegregated childcare, methods of the desegregated childcare, effects of the desegregated childcare, obstacles to the desegregated childcare, and reform measures for the desegregated childcare.
The results of this study can be summarized as follows;
First, in terms of understanding and accommodation of the desegregated childcare, it was found that the groups of parents were positive more or less towards the desegregated childcare. In addition, there was found not much significant difference between parents' positive perception of the desegregated childcare and their willingness to have their children taken care of by the desegregated childcare centers.
Second, in terms of the methods of the desegregated childcare, many parents wanted a desegregated childcare in consideration of the handicap conditions. In other words, they did not care if their healthy children were nursed together with the slightly handicapped children. Merely, there was a difference of opinions regarding the handicap condition. On the other hand, most parents hoped that teachers and parents would discuss the desegregated childcare in advance, and that they would participate in the decision making. The majority of healthy children's parents thought it adequate that a handicapped child would be mixed with 10 ∼ 15 healthy children, while the majority of handicapped children's parents thought it adequate that a handicapped child would be mixed with less than 10 healthy children. Most of the parents felt it necessary that special teachers and ordinary teachers should involve in the desegregated childcare.
Third, in terms of the effects of the desegregated childcare, most of the handicapped children's parents perceived that the desegregated childcare would be helpful to handicapped children's cognitive development, linguistic development, social adaptability and human relationship. On the other hand, most of the healthy children's parents perceived that the desegregated childcare would help their healthy children to understand handicapped people's conditions and develop a favorable attitudes towards them.
Fourth, in terms of the obstacles to the desegregated childcare, most of the parents whose children were attending the desegregated childcare centers counted lack of concern about or understanding of the desegregated childcare, while most of the parents whose children were attending the private childcare centers thought that the obstacles were poor legal system and lack of administrative and financial support. To be more specific, those parents in their 20's counted poor understanding of the desegregated childcare, while those in their 30's and 40's pinpointed lack of legal, administrative and financial support.
Fifth, in terms of the reform measures for the desegregated childcare, handicapped children's parents perceived that childcare center operators and healthy children's parents should have a better understanding of the handicapped children, while healthy children's parents thought that legal, administrative and financial supports from the government were most essential. On the other hand, those parents who were in their 20's or who graduated from high school or lower schools or who were housewives or temporary workers perceived that the desegregated childcare should be compulsory legally, while those parents who were int their 30's or 40's, who graduated from colleges or higher schools, who were salary women or operating a self-owned business thought that legal, administrative and financial supports for the desegregated childcare were foremost.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 제1장 서론 = 1
• 제1절 연구의 필요성 및 목적 = 1
• 제2절 연구문제 = 4
• 제3절 연구의 제한점 = 5
• 제2장 장애유아 통합보육의 이론적 배경 = 6
• 제1절 장애유아 통합보육의 중요성 = 6
• 1. 장애유아의 개념 = 6
• 2. 장애유형별 발달 특성에 대한 이해 = 8
• 3. 장애유아의 조기보육과 통합의 중요성 = 14
• 제2절 통합보육의 개념과 구성요소 = 17
• 1. 통합보육의 개념 = 17
• 2. 통합보육의 구성요소 = 19
• 제3절 선행연구고찰 = 25
• 제3장 연구방법 = 31
• 제1절 조사대상 = 31
• 제2절 조사도구 = 32
• 제3절 조사절차 = 32
• 제4절 자료처리 = 32
• 제4장 연구결과 = 34
• 제1절 장애유아 통합보육의 이해도 및 수용여부 = 34
• 제2절 장애유아 통합보육의 방법 = 51
• 제3절 통합보육의 효과 = 63
• 제4절 통합보육의 저해요인 = 71
• 제5장 장애유아 통합보육의 활성화 방안 = 82
• 제1절 조사결과 분석 = 82
• 제2절 장애유아 통합보육 발전 방안 = 94
• 제6장 결론 및 제언 = 100
• 참고문헌 = 104
• 부록 = 108
• ABSTRACT = 114