RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    스티븐 페트로니오(Steven Petronio)의 작품에 나타난 키치적(kitschy) 성향 연구 = Research into the Kitschy Side of Stephen Petronio’ Works

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103977058

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Stephen Petronio, who continued the experimental line of Postmodernism, ranging through trans-boundaries to trans-stereotypes, is thought of as an author reflecting the anguish of our time, and embracing extensive symbolisms and layers of sensation. Being active in both America and Europe, he carries a unique modern sense and defiant style, which is portrayed in his works. Research into his work style will be a good opportunity to perceive dance of our times, and prepare diverse discussions and guidelines on its identity. His works reveal three features as follows. First of all, his works talk of sex. Beyond discussing its various perspectives, he points out the social problems derived from sex. Secondly, independence of movement is emphasized in his works. He rejects creating movement by way of visualizing music or reacting to one. Thirdly, we can experience formative movements embroidered in space. His motions seem improvised within duets and group dances but they are the results of strenuous practice. There is both stubbornness towards prohibiting a single margin for error as in the Classics and freedom exerting durability of dance. The connection between formative and constructive movements speaks of him as much as the body of a dancer in swift motion speaks of his works.
    Thus, when the characteristics of his works are viewed from a kitschy perspective, four interpretations are possible. ‘Accumulation’, ‘inappropriateness’, ‘synesthesia’, ‘balance’ from Moles’ kitsch can be elucidated by Petronio’s choreographic method, subject selection, diverse motion, and connection with the audience. First, through the cloning of dance, freedom of construction is provided. As a result, the notion that dance is one work of art, which includes originality of one individual, is destroyed. The déjà vu scenes presented in his works are ones overtly extracted from his other works. Copying images, disorderly pasting and inserting them, and transforming the duplicates reveal our era. Furthermore, by a queerish approach, he accelerated the sex liberation history by portraying tabooed lust or love within movements in a provocative and explicit manner. He practices the belief that what is called on repeatedly, especially by means of a dancer’s body, shall be the truth. He uses this belief to emphasize speech as a political action. Thirdly, he provides an empathic experience through the diversity of movements. The bodies of dancers from different dancing backgrounds and exchange of motion that defies any genre bring an endless stream of movements that are constructed and dissolved. Thus, it explosively releases the magnetism of dance brought on by motions. Lastly, though he choreographs dance separate of music, he conjoins other arts to pursue both the taste of the mass and varying dance pieces. He understands the slow growing pains of art without an audience and as such is tuned to their expectations and concerns. Like this, he presents various dances to the audience, and at the same time seeks a public perspective by experimenting with the space of the dance stage. A public understanding allowing varied interpretations of dance on the stage is the distinct reason for his collaborative pieces.
    In conclusion, works of Stephen Petronio, America’s lead modern choreographer, can be interpreted in terms of Moles’category of kitsch. As Harold Rosenberg mentioned that ‘kitsch is the result of modernity and the most important form of art’, interpretation of and tendency towards the human body can be newly developed as queer, and the cloning of dance, freedom of empathic force, and approach of pluralistic art can be explained by way of kitsch. The significance of kitsch, in reference to dance, is the possibility of it opening a new artistic horizon with a modern approach as a compass, and also being the interpretive code for deciphering contemporary dance.
    번역하기

    Stephen Petronio, who continued the experimental line of Postmodernism, ranging through trans-boundaries to trans-stereotypes, is thought of as an author reflecting the anguish of our time, and embracing extensive symbolisms and layers of sensation. B...

    Stephen Petronio, who continued the experimental line of Postmodernism, ranging through trans-boundaries to trans-stereotypes, is thought of as an author reflecting the anguish of our time, and embracing extensive symbolisms and layers of sensation. Being active in both America and Europe, he carries a unique modern sense and defiant style, which is portrayed in his works. Research into his work style will be a good opportunity to perceive dance of our times, and prepare diverse discussions and guidelines on its identity. His works reveal three features as follows. First of all, his works talk of sex. Beyond discussing its various perspectives, he points out the social problems derived from sex. Secondly, independence of movement is emphasized in his works. He rejects creating movement by way of visualizing music or reacting to one. Thirdly, we can experience formative movements embroidered in space. His motions seem improvised within duets and group dances but they are the results of strenuous practice. There is both stubbornness towards prohibiting a single margin for error as in the Classics and freedom exerting durability of dance. The connection between formative and constructive movements speaks of him as much as the body of a dancer in swift motion speaks of his works.
    Thus, when the characteristics of his works are viewed from a kitschy perspective, four interpretations are possible. ‘Accumulation’, ‘inappropriateness’, ‘synesthesia’, ‘balance’ from Moles’ kitsch can be elucidated by Petronio’s choreographic method, subject selection, diverse motion, and connection with the audience. First, through the cloning of dance, freedom of construction is provided. As a result, the notion that dance is one work of art, which includes originality of one individual, is destroyed. The déjà vu scenes presented in his works are ones overtly extracted from his other works. Copying images, disorderly pasting and inserting them, and transforming the duplicates reveal our era. Furthermore, by a queerish approach, he accelerated the sex liberation history by portraying tabooed lust or love within movements in a provocative and explicit manner. He practices the belief that what is called on repeatedly, especially by means of a dancer’s body, shall be the truth. He uses this belief to emphasize speech as a political action. Thirdly, he provides an empathic experience through the diversity of movements. The bodies of dancers from different dancing backgrounds and exchange of motion that defies any genre bring an endless stream of movements that are constructed and dissolved. Thus, it explosively releases the magnetism of dance brought on by motions. Lastly, though he choreographs dance separate of music, he conjoins other arts to pursue both the taste of the mass and varying dance pieces. He understands the slow growing pains of art without an audience and as such is tuned to their expectations and concerns. Like this, he presents various dances to the audience, and at the same time seeks a public perspective by experimenting with the space of the dance stage. A public understanding allowing varied interpretations of dance on the stage is the distinct reason for his collaborative pieces.
    In conclusion, works of Stephen Petronio, America’s lead modern choreographer, can be interpreted in terms of Moles’category of kitsch. As Harold Rosenberg mentioned that ‘kitsch is the result of modernity and the most important form of art’, interpretation of and tendency towards the human body can be newly developed as queer, and the cloning of dance, freedom of empathic force, and approach of pluralistic art can be explained by way of kitsch. The significance of kitsch, in reference to dance, is the possibility of it opening a new artistic horizon with a modern approach as a compass, and also being the interpretive code for deciphering contemporary dance.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김경옥, "현대패션에 표현된 키치연구" 경희대학교 1998

    2 클레멘트 그린버그, "현대미술비평 30선" 중앙일보사 1987

    3 김경연, "헤르만브로흐의문학이론" 한국독어독문학회 2 : 1984

    4 에드워드루시스미스, "팝아트" 열화당 1988

    5 아브라함몰르, "키치란무엇인가?" 시각과언어 1994

    6 이지원, "춤 예술의 또 다른 주체, '타자'와의 공존- E. Levinas의 철학적 사유를 중심으로-" 한국무용예술학회 26 (26): 153-195, 2009

    7 양계현, "춘향전을 패러디한 사진 연구"

    8 아놀드하우저, "예술의사회학" 한길사 1990

    9 서지에라인필드, "스티븐페트로니오의춤세계" (9월) : 1991

    10 장보드리야르, "소비사회" 문예출판사 1991

    1 김경옥, "현대패션에 표현된 키치연구" 경희대학교 1998

    2 클레멘트 그린버그, "현대미술비평 30선" 중앙일보사 1987

    3 김경연, "헤르만브로흐의문학이론" 한국독어독문학회 2 : 1984

    4 에드워드루시스미스, "팝아트" 열화당 1988

    5 아브라함몰르, "키치란무엇인가?" 시각과언어 1994

    6 이지원, "춤 예술의 또 다른 주체, '타자'와의 공존- E. Levinas의 철학적 사유를 중심으로-" 한국무용예술학회 26 (26): 153-195, 2009

    7 양계현, "춘향전을 패러디한 사진 연구"

    8 아놀드하우저, "예술의사회학" 한길사 1990

    9 서지에라인필드, "스티븐페트로니오의춤세계" (9월) : 1991

    10 장보드리야르, "소비사회" 문예출판사 1991

    11 권택영, "버틀러의 퀴어이론과 정신분석" 한국영미문학페미니즘학회 10 (10): 1-26, 2002

    12 마크A.치담, "미술사의 현대적 시각들" 경성대학교출판부 2007

    13 이종호, "미국안무가스티븐페트로니오내한공연"

    14 미우라마사시, "무용의현대" 늘봄 2004

    15 M.칼리니스쿠, "모더니티의 다섯 얼굴" 시각과 언어 3-, 1987

    16 폴로랑스타마뉴, "동성애의역사" 이마고 2007

    17 김상환, "니체가뒤흔든철학100년" 민음사 2000

    18 "http://www.youtube.com"

    19 "http://www.wweek.com"

    20 "http://www.stephenpetronio.com"

    21 "http://www.seattlepi.com"

    22 "http://www.londondance.com"

    23 "http://www.hop.dartmouth.edu"

    24 "http://www.flynncenter.org"

    25 Herold Rosenberg, "The Tradition of News" Univ. Chicago Press 1959

    26 Debra Craine, "The Oxford Dictionary of Dance" Oxford University Press 2000

    27 Ramsay Burt, "The Male Dancer" Roughtde 2001

    28 Heather Wisner, "Stephen Petronio: Bloom"

    29 Donald Hutera, "Stephen Petronio at the Queen Elizabeth Hall"

    30 Tresca Weinstein, "Stephen Petronio Company"

    31 Jennifer Dunning, "Rufus Wainwright as Muse: Stephen Petronio’s ‘Bud Suite’ and ‘Bloom’ at the Joyce"

    32 "Rufus Wainwright and Stephen Petronio’s Bloom"

    33 Perron,Wendy, "Petronio Goes British. : Stephen Petronio chooses British collaborators for his new work"

    34 Anna Kisselgoff, "Petronio Company Explores Esthetics of a Post-Punk Era"

    35 Quinn Batson, "Out at Sea in Stormy Weather: Stephen Petronio Company faces the future on its 25th Anniversary"

    36 Jack Anderson, "On Triptychs, Corsets and Other Imponderables"

    37 Vanessa Manko, "Of Buds, Blooms and Battments: Stephen Petronio at The Joyce"

    38 Martha Bremser, "Fifty Contemporary Choreographers" Routledge 1999

    39 Edward Lucie Smith, "Dictionary of Art Terms" Thames & Hudson 1993

    40 Anna Kisselgoff, "Dance; Hurtling, Hurdling and Whirling Near the Edge"

    41 Valerie Gladstone, "Dance"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2014-10-22 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society for Dance Studies KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.51 0.51 0.53
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.51 0.52 0.698 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼