RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    현물출자의 과세이연에 대한 몇 가지 쟁점 검토 = Reviewing Some Issues on the Tax Deferral for In-kind Investment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109790952

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    [Purpose]The aim of this study is to examine various controversial issues related to the deferral of taxation on in-kind investments and present solutions.
    [Methodology]The study first provides an overview of three key aspects.:(1) the tax deferral on in-kind investments under Article 47-2 of the Corporate Tax Act, (2) the tax deferral on in-kind investments when establishing or converting a holding company under Article 38-2 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, and (3) the tax deferral on in-kind investments when a private business entity is converted into a corporation under Article 32 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act. Based on this overview, the study draws reasoned conclusions through detailed discussions of interpretative issues and legislative theory.
    [Findings]The results of the study can be categorized into three main findings.
    (1) Regarding the tax deferral on in-kind investments under Article 47-2 of the Corporate Tax Act, when a corporation contributes assets that have not been used in its business in kind, and the recipient corporation utilizes these assets for its existing business, it is reasonable not to permit tax deferral. This conclusion is supported by the interpretation of the statutory language, legislative history, objectives, and consistency with tax provisions related to mergers and divisions.
    (2) In relation to the establishment and conversion of holding companies under Article 38-2 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, tax deferral on in-kind investments of stocks should be abolished and aligned with Article 47-2 of the Corporate Tax Act.
    (3) When a private business entity converts into a corporation under Article 32 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, it is advisable to shift from the carryover tax method to the accelerated depreciation allowances method concerning in-kind investments. However, a secondary tax liability should be imposed on the converting corporation to enhance tax collection.
    [Implications]This study contributes to improving the tax deferral system for in-kind investments by addressing ambiguities in the interpretation of tax deferral provisions.
    번역하기

    [Purpose]The aim of this study is to examine various controversial issues related to the deferral of taxation on in-kind investments and present solutions. [Methodology]The study first provides an overview of three key aspects.:(1) the tax deferra...

    [Purpose]The aim of this study is to examine various controversial issues related to the deferral of taxation on in-kind investments and present solutions.
    [Methodology]The study first provides an overview of three key aspects.:(1) the tax deferral on in-kind investments under Article 47-2 of the Corporate Tax Act, (2) the tax deferral on in-kind investments when establishing or converting a holding company under Article 38-2 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, and (3) the tax deferral on in-kind investments when a private business entity is converted into a corporation under Article 32 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act. Based on this overview, the study draws reasoned conclusions through detailed discussions of interpretative issues and legislative theory.
    [Findings]The results of the study can be categorized into three main findings.
    (1) Regarding the tax deferral on in-kind investments under Article 47-2 of the Corporate Tax Act, when a corporation contributes assets that have not been used in its business in kind, and the recipient corporation utilizes these assets for its existing business, it is reasonable not to permit tax deferral. This conclusion is supported by the interpretation of the statutory language, legislative history, objectives, and consistency with tax provisions related to mergers and divisions.
    (2) In relation to the establishment and conversion of holding companies under Article 38-2 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, tax deferral on in-kind investments of stocks should be abolished and aligned with Article 47-2 of the Corporate Tax Act.
    (3) When a private business entity converts into a corporation under Article 32 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act, it is advisable to shift from the carryover tax method to the accelerated depreciation allowances method concerning in-kind investments. However, a secondary tax liability should be imposed on the converting corporation to enhance tax collection.
    [Implications]This study contributes to improving the tax deferral system for in-kind investments by addressing ambiguities in the interpretation of tax deferral provisions.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼