RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    기후변화협상에 있어 한국의 전략

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82459916

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As in the Kyoto accord, whose emission reductions expire in 2012, many nations talk aim to negotiate 2020 reduction targets for industrial countries and developing countries. Unlike Kyoto, developing countries will be asked to contribute by presenting detailed plans for shifting to low-carbon growth, although it is unclear how that would be written into the accord and whether they would be held to account for their promises. In this situation, Korean government, not obliged to accept a carbon cap, pledged to cut emissions by 4 percent to 2020 from 2005 levels.
    By definition, negotiation is dynamic process that take place between interdependent participants(people, groups, or nations) or among more than three who have different interests in order for them to be able to come to an agreement about actions for exchanging something, to guide or to regulate. I present an framework for evaluating on the climate change negotiation taking into account dynamic processes occurring during negotiation rounds. The climate change negotiation could be effective in the compromising strategy which is a high priority for both the relationship and the outcome. But there is a lot of gap between the developed nations and the developing nations. In this respective, I explain negotiation context and negotiation strategies for the enlargement of a cooperative agreement. I analyz the symmetric obligation principle which derived from UNFCCC and the diversity of participants. I evaluate the strategies of USA, EU, Japan, and China in the course of a climate change negotiation round. Lastly, I suggest some strategies of Korea for the climate change negotiation based on the evaluation.
    번역하기

    As in the Kyoto accord, whose emission reductions expire in 2012, many nations talk aim to negotiate 2020 reduction targets for industrial countries and developing countries. Unlike Kyoto, developing countries will be asked to contribute by presenting...

    As in the Kyoto accord, whose emission reductions expire in 2012, many nations talk aim to negotiate 2020 reduction targets for industrial countries and developing countries. Unlike Kyoto, developing countries will be asked to contribute by presenting detailed plans for shifting to low-carbon growth, although it is unclear how that would be written into the accord and whether they would be held to account for their promises. In this situation, Korean government, not obliged to accept a carbon cap, pledged to cut emissions by 4 percent to 2020 from 2005 levels.
    By definition, negotiation is dynamic process that take place between interdependent participants(people, groups, or nations) or among more than three who have different interests in order for them to be able to come to an agreement about actions for exchanging something, to guide or to regulate. I present an framework for evaluating on the climate change negotiation taking into account dynamic processes occurring during negotiation rounds. The climate change negotiation could be effective in the compromising strategy which is a high priority for both the relationship and the outcome. But there is a lot of gap between the developed nations and the developing nations. In this respective, I explain negotiation context and negotiation strategies for the enlargement of a cooperative agreement. I analyz the symmetric obligation principle which derived from UNFCCC and the diversity of participants. I evaluate the strategies of USA, EU, Japan, and China in the course of a climate change negotiation round. Lastly, I suggest some strategies of Korea for the climate change negotiation based on the evaluation.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김문성, "환경과경쟁력: 국제환경협약들에대한한국의정책, IMF지원체제하의국가정책관 리" 55-72, 1998

    2 안세영, "협상사례중심글로발협상전략" 박영사 2008

    3 "행정학, NET" 박영사 2007

    4 중앙일보, "중앙일보"

    5 이기춘, "우리나라의기후변화협약협상대응전략에대한비판적고찰" 충남대학교경제경영연 구소 149-171, 1998

    6 환경부, "발리로드맵채택과Post Kyoto 협상전략연구"

    7 김동수, "기후변화협약의 국제정치: 우리나라에 대한 영향과 대응방안" 한국 정치학회 28 (28): 2771-2789, 1994

    8 정성춘외, "기후변화협상의국제적동향과시사점"

    9 김광구, "기후변화에 대응하기 위한 정책역량 제고방안에 관한 연구" 한국정책학회 655-674, 2009

    10 "기후변화e-newsletter"

    1 김문성, "환경과경쟁력: 국제환경협약들에대한한국의정책, IMF지원체제하의국가정책관 리" 55-72, 1998

    2 안세영, "협상사례중심글로발협상전략" 박영사 2008

    3 "행정학, NET" 박영사 2007

    4 중앙일보, "중앙일보"

    5 이기춘, "우리나라의기후변화협약협상대응전략에대한비판적고찰" 충남대학교경제경영연 구소 149-171, 1998

    6 환경부, "발리로드맵채택과Post Kyoto 협상전략연구"

    7 김동수, "기후변화협약의 국제정치: 우리나라에 대한 영향과 대응방안" 한국 정치학회 28 (28): 2771-2789, 1994

    8 정성춘외, "기후변화협상의국제적동향과시사점"

    9 김광구, "기후변화에 대응하기 위한 정책역량 제고방안에 관한 연구" 한국정책학회 655-674, 2009

    10 "기후변화e-newsletter"

    11 "기후변화e-newsletter"

    12 한철, "국제거래와 기후변화협약" 한국경영법률학회 19 (19): 545-581, 2009

    13 日本外務省, "地球溫暖化問題に關す最近の國際交涉"

    14 中國國家發展化改革委員會, "中國정부政府氣候變化國家方案"

    15 "http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews"

    16 "http://www.me.go.kr//environment/10.htm"

    17 "http://www. Asia-Pacific Partnership. org."

    18 "http://unfccc.int/ search"

    19 Williams,M., "The third world and global environmental negotiations: Interests, institutions and ideas" 48-69, 2005

    20 Yamin, F., "The international climate change regime. A guide to rules, institutions and procedures" Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 2004

    21 Zartman, "The Practical Negotiator" New Haven: Yale University Press 1982

    22 Grubb,Michael, "The Greenhouse Effect: Negotiating Targets" London: Royal Institute of International Affairs 1989

    23 Salacuse,Jaswald, "The Global Negotiator: Making, Managing and Mending Deals Around the World in the Twenty-First Century" New York:PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. 2003

    24 Phatak, Arvind V., "The Dynamics of International Business Negotiations" 39 (39): 30-38, 1996

    25 "Seven Secrets for Negotiating with Government: How to Deal with Local, State, National, or Foreign Governments and Come Out Ahead" New York: AMACOM 2008

    26 Lewicki, "Selecting a Strategy, In Lewicki, Barry and Saunders. Negotiation" Boston, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2007

    27 European Commission, "Proposal for a Directive on the Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources" 85 (85): 2008

    28 Benick,Richard, "Ozone Deplomacy" Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1991

    29 Churchman,David, "Negotiation : Process, Tactics, Theory, Seconded" NY: University Press of America, Inc. 1995

    30 Bingham,Lisa, "Negotiating for the Public Good. In James Perry, (ed.). Handbook of Public Administration" San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass 647-664, 1996

    31 Cohen,Raymond, "Negotiating across Cultures: International Communication in an Interdependent World" Washington D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press 1999

    32 Richard Luecke, "Harvard Business Essantials: Negotiation" Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 2003

    33 Bergesen, Helge, "Green Globe Yearbook of nternational Cooperation on Environment and Development" Oxford: Oxford University Press 1995

    34 Fisher, R., "Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agrement Without Giving In" New York: Penguin Book 1991

    35 Parson, Edward, "Equal Measures or Fair Burdens: Negotiating Environmental Treaties in an Unequal World.”In Henry Lee (eds.). Shaping National Responses To Climate Change: A Post-Rio Guide" Washington, D.C.: Island Press 1994

    36 Ausubel,Jesse, "Does Climate Still Matter?" 350 (350): 6320-6322, 1991

    37 Evans, "Doble-Edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining and Domestic Politics" Berkeley, CA: University of California 1993

    38 Kahneman, Daniel, "Choices, Values, and Frames" New York: Cambridge University Press 2000

    39 Asia-Pacific Parternership on Clean Development and Climate, "Brief Country Statments: Australia, China, Japan, Korea, U.S. in 7th Policy and Implementation Committee Meeting in Austria"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-05-07 학회명변경 한글명 : 경기개발연구원 -> 경기연구원 KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.83 0.83 1.04
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.87 0.82 1.233 0.25
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼