RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      제국일본의 화공(華工)과 식민당국의 화공정책 ― 식민지 조선과 타이완을 중심으로 = Chinese Laborers in the Japanese Empire, and the Colonial Policies that Regulated Them: The Situation in Colonial Korea and Taiwan

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103951075

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      After the Sino-Japanese War, human migration in East Asia began to dramatically increase. This included Japanese migration to Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China, Korean migration to Manchuria and Japan, and Chinese migration to Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Such mass migration within East Asia triggered the overall transformation of the region in political, economic, and cultural terms. This paper focuses primarily on Chinese migration, which, while constituting a much smaller part of this mass migration than that of Japanese or Koreans, nonetheless continued with little interruption during this time of great political upheaval, which included port opening, wars, and colonization. This was due to the fact that Chinese migration in East Asia was largely economically motivated, unlike Japanese and Korean migration, which was often caused by political factors. The majority of all overseas Chinese, commonly called huaqiao, were laborers, or huagong, and this was the case in East Asia too. In the 1920s in particular, the vast majority of the Chinese living in colonial Korea and Taiwan were laborers, and they were consistently absorbed into the Japanese empire, which was linked to the growth of capitalism in Japan, Japan’s efficient colonial rule, and the migration of Japanese and Korean laborers in East Asia. Consequently, Japanese colonial authorities had no choice but to take a serious view of the problem of Chinese laborers, especially regarding policies pertaining to their employment, public security, and custom. This paper attempts to shed new light on the meanings of port opening, war, and colonialism in East Asia by examining the motivation, nature, and organization of migrant Chinese laborers in colonial Korea and Taiwan as well as the policies Japan drew up to regulate them within their colonial purview.
      번역하기

      After the Sino-Japanese War, human migration in East Asia began to dramatically increase. This included Japanese migration to Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China, Korean migration to Manchuria and Japan, and Chinese migration to Korea, Taiwan and Japan....

      After the Sino-Japanese War, human migration in East Asia began to dramatically increase. This included Japanese migration to Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China, Korean migration to Manchuria and Japan, and Chinese migration to Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Such mass migration within East Asia triggered the overall transformation of the region in political, economic, and cultural terms. This paper focuses primarily on Chinese migration, which, while constituting a much smaller part of this mass migration than that of Japanese or Koreans, nonetheless continued with little interruption during this time of great political upheaval, which included port opening, wars, and colonization. This was due to the fact that Chinese migration in East Asia was largely economically motivated, unlike Japanese and Korean migration, which was often caused by political factors. The majority of all overseas Chinese, commonly called huaqiao, were laborers, or huagong, and this was the case in East Asia too. In the 1920s in particular, the vast majority of the Chinese living in colonial Korea and Taiwan were laborers, and they were consistently absorbed into the Japanese empire, which was linked to the growth of capitalism in Japan, Japan’s efficient colonial rule, and the migration of Japanese and Korean laborers in East Asia. Consequently, Japanese colonial authorities had no choice but to take a serious view of the problem of Chinese laborers, especially regarding policies pertaining to their employment, public security, and custom. This paper attempts to shed new light on the meanings of port opening, war, and colonialism in East Asia by examining the motivation, nature, and organization of migrant Chinese laborers in colonial Korea and Taiwan as well as the policies Japan drew up to regulate them within their colonial purview.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "「중국인의 직업침탈」, 『동아일보』, 1924. 9. 22"

      2 讀賣新聞, "「中華義莊, 假の墓から永眠の地へ」, 2008. 2. 24"

      3 최승현, "화교의 역사 생존의 역사" 화약고 2007

      4 장수현, "한국화교의 사회적 위상과 문화적 정체성" (4) : 2001

      5 김경국, "한국의 화교연구 배경 및 동향 분석" 중국인문학회 26 : 29-516, 2003

      6 이창호, "한국 화교(華僑)의 사회적 지위와 관계의 공간: 인천 화교의 관시(關係)와 후이(會)를 중심으로" 비교문화연구소 14 (14): 75-122, 2008

      7 전우용, "한국 근대의 華僑 문제" 고려사학회 15 : 13-412, 2003

      8 배성준, "일제하 경성지역 공업 연구" 서울대학교 1998

      9 이옥련, "인천 화교사회의 형성과 전개" 인천문화재단 2008

      10 이시카와 료타(石川亮太), "동순태와 인천 화교무역" 9 : 2007

      1 "「중국인의 직업침탈」, 『동아일보』, 1924. 9. 22"

      2 讀賣新聞, "「中華義莊, 假の墓から永眠の地へ」, 2008. 2. 24"

      3 최승현, "화교의 역사 생존의 역사" 화약고 2007

      4 장수현, "한국화교의 사회적 위상과 문화적 정체성" (4) : 2001

      5 김경국, "한국의 화교연구 배경 및 동향 분석" 중국인문학회 26 : 29-516, 2003

      6 이창호, "한국 화교(華僑)의 사회적 지위와 관계의 공간: 인천 화교의 관시(關係)와 후이(會)를 중심으로" 비교문화연구소 14 (14): 75-122, 2008

      7 전우용, "한국 근대의 華僑 문제" 고려사학회 15 : 13-412, 2003

      8 배성준, "일제하 경성지역 공업 연구" 서울대학교 1998

      9 이옥련, "인천 화교사회의 형성과 전개" 인천문화재단 2008

      10 이시카와 료타(石川亮太), "동순태와 인천 화교무역" 9 : 2007

      11 朝鮮總督府警務局, "高等警察報 3號"

      12 劉德增, "闖關東―2500萬山東移民的歷史與傳說" 山東人民出版社 2008

      13 정혜중, "開港期 仁川 華商 네트워크와 華僑 정착의 특징" 중국근현대사학회 (36) : 1-28, 2007

      14 堀內稔, "赴戰江水電工事と中國人勞動者" 183 : 2000

      15 岡本達朗, "聞書水俣民衆史5植民地は天國1だつた" 草風館 1990

      16 山邊健太朗, "現代史資料(21) 台灣" みすず書局 1971

      17 朝鮮警察協會, "朝鮮警察法令聚 中卷 1"

      18 王正廷, "朝鮮華僑槪況" 1930

      19 楊昭全, "朝鮮華僑史" 中國華僑出版公司 1991

      20 "朝鮮曆年華僑人口調査統計" 4 (4): 1931

      21 小田內通敏, "朝鮮に於ける支那人の經濟的勢力" 東洋硏究會 1925

      22 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮に於ける支那人(調査資料 第7輯)" 1924

      23 朝鮮總督府警務局, "昭和二年 治安狀況" 1927

      24 吳文星, "日據時期在台「華僑」硏究" 學生書局 1991

      25 安井三吉, "帝國日本と華僑―日本⋅台灣⋅朝鮮" 靑木書店 2005

      26 許雪姬, "台灣中華總會館成立前的‘台灣華僑’ 1895-1927" 20 : 1991

      27 台灣中華總會館, "台灣中華總會館十年紀念特刊" 台灣新民報社 1936

      28 松尾弘, "台灣の支那人勞動者" (3) : 1937

      29 "南京國民政府 外交部公報" 江蘇古籍出版社 1990

      30 류제헌, "仁川市 華僑街의 盛衰過程: 1884-1992" 한국문화역사지리학회 18 (18): 11-37, 2006

      31 京畿道警察部, "京畿道警察例規聚" 朝鮮警察協會京城支部 1927

      32 京畿道警察部, "京畿道警察例規聚" 朝鮮警察協會京城支部 1927

      33 "『外事警察關係雜纂』 K.3.6.0.1, 外交史料館(外務省) 所藏資料, 1937"

      34 H. F. MacNari, "Chinese Emigration" 1923

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.44 0.44 0.36
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.37 0.34 0.589 0.43
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼