과학 창의성 향상을 위한 가족활동(FAISC) 프로그램의 적용 효과 = An Application Effect of FamiLy Activity for Improving Scientific Creativity (FAISC)

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the previous study (Jee & Park, 2013), family activities, which can be utilized to improve scientific creativity at home have been developed and used. In that study, 12 families fell into two groups, received 6 programs for scientific creativity respectively, and conducted the program for six weeks. As consequences, various positive responses from participants have been received. This survey has been conducted to test whether scientific creativity could be improved quantitatively through family activity at home, and to examine parents` recognition of the feasibility of teaching creativity as well. To answer this, a scientific creativity test consisting of three items in the pre- and post-test respectively have been developed and carried out. The test includes various elements of scientific creativity defined by Park (2011). For obtaining parents` responses, a questionnaire has been developed and applied. The results reveal that parents have changed their thought to ‘everyone can conduct scientific creativity activity at home if effective programs are provided and they learn the basic skills to do it.’ And, through the scientific creativity test, the experimental group has indicated an improvement in scientific creativity with statistical significance and a large effect size. Therefore, we suggest that family activity for scientific creativity can be applied to family activity in various situations such as camp, leasure or science museum.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이경학, "교사 연수를 통한 과제 수행형 과학적 창의성 평가도구(TATSC) 현장 활용 가능성 탐색" 과학교육연구소 51 (51): 1-15, 2012

2 박종원, "과학적 창의성의 이해와 지도" 한국물리학회 61 (61): 947-961, 2011

3 지경준, "과학적 창의성 향상을 위한 가족활동(FAISC) 프로그램의 개발과 적용" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 114-131, 2013

4 Plucker, J. A., "Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists’ Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research" 39 (39): 83-96, 2004

5 Lin, C., "The influence of CASE on scientific creativity" 33 : 143-162, 2003

6 Aktamis, H., "The effect of scientific process skills education on students’ scientific creativity, science attitudes and academic achievements" 9 (9): 1-21, 2008

7 Hu, W., "The comparisons of the development of creativity between English and Chinese adolescents" 36 (36): 718-731, 2004

8 Kang, D., "The change of fluency according to activity time when conducting scientific creativity activity" 2013

9 Aljughaiman, A., "Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students" 39 (39): 17-34, 2005

10 Crowley, K., "Shared scientific thinking in everyday parent-child activity" 85 (85): 712-732, 2001

11 AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science), "Science for All Americans: Project 2061" Oxford University Press 1990

12 Lin, C., "Researches Into Creative Talents and Creative Education" Economic Science Press 2009

13 Kampylis, P. G., "Redefining creativity - Analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences" 44 (44): 191-214, 2010

14 Hu, W., "Increasing students’ scientific creativity : The"Learn to Think"intervention program" 47 (47): 3-21, 2013

15 Ellenbogen, K. M., "Family learning research in museums: An emerging disciplinary matrix?" 88 (88): S48-S58, 2004

16 Fivush, R., "Elaborating on elaborations : Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development" 77 : 1568-1588, 2006

17 Jee, K., "Development of scientific creativity test items and analysis of teachers’ responses on it" 2010

18 Frederiksen, N., "Development of provisional criteria for the study of scientific creativity" 1973

19 박종원, "Developing the Format and Samples of Teaching Materials for Scientific Creativity in the Ordinary Science Curriculum -Including Teachers' Practice and Reflection-" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 446-466, 2012

20 Diakidoy, I-A. N., "Creativity in physics:Response fluency and task specificity" 13 (13): 401-410, 2001

21 Hu, W., "Creative scientific problem finding and its developmental trend" 22 (22): 1-7, 2010

22 Ward, W. C., "Construct validity of free-response and machine scorable versions of a test of scientific thinking" 17 (17): 11-29, 1980

23 Hansen, J. B., "Comparison of trained and untrained teachers of gifted students" 38 (38): 115-121, 1994

24 Torrance, E. P., "Can we teach children to think creatively?" 6 (6): 114-143, 1972

25 Fryer, M., "British teachers’ views of creativity" 25 (25): 75-81, 1991

26 Newton, D. P., "Assessing the creativity of scientific explanations in elementary science : An insider-outsider view of intuitive assessment in the hypothesis space" 28 (28): 187-201, 2010

27 Mark A. Runco, "Assessing the Accuracy of Judgments of Originality on Three Divergent Thinking Tests" 대한사고개발학회 14 (14): 5-14, 2004

28 Ma, H. H., "A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs" 28 (28): 435-446, 2006

29 Hu. W., "A scientific creativity test for secondary school students" 24 (24): 389-403, 2002