RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    특집논문 : 대장경과 교판 = The Tripitaka and the Classification

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study presents an investigation into the relations between the Tripitaka the complete collection of Buddhist Sutras, Laws, and Treatises) and the Classification. The results suggest that there will be no problem if they follow the organization and system of the Goryeo Tripitaka in deciding the directions for Hangul Tripitaka. Given that the original purport of the Tripitaka and Classification was to understand the words of Buddha as part of Buddhist methodology, it`s required to change the existing perception of the Classification. If the realistic wall for the Oshiseol is still high, however, those following alternatives can be pursued: First, it`s a good idea to adopt the doctrine of Classification by Great Buddhist Priest Wonhyo in order to have all the aspects as a Korean Tripitaka. But there are a couple of issues to be taken care of first; his writings are not whole today; it`s not easy to decide his doctrine of Classification based on a few of his writings; and most of all, there is no consistent doctrine of Classification. Secondly, you can organize Tripitaka in a systematic way by using the Oshipalgyoseol by Buddhist Priest Jegwan in Goryeo. However, it will be extremely difficult to overcome the limitations deriving from the Classification of Tien-tai Buddhism. And finally, there is the final option of using the list by the Most Revered Priest Uicheon. Even though the list was not used in the Goryeo Tripitaka, it can be a good approach to organize Jangso around Gyeongrok like the list based on the asstumption that the Hangul Tripitaka is an imitation of the Goryeo Tripitaka. But the Sinpyin chejong kyojang chongnok (or the Uicheon List) is problematic with the Samjang organization as it`s a collection of the Gyojang of Jejong. In short, there are several problems to deal with when applying the doctrine of Classification by Wonhyo or Jegwan and the list by Uicheon right to the organization of the Hangul Tripitaka. However, the active utilization of the doctrine of Classification by our priests can be meaningful in that it can multiply the significance of the Hangul Tripitaka and enhance the pride of the Korean people.
    번역하기

    This study presents an investigation into the relations between the Tripitaka the complete collection of Buddhist Sutras, Laws, and Treatises) and the Classification. The results suggest that there will be no problem if they follow the organization an...

    This study presents an investigation into the relations between the Tripitaka the complete collection of Buddhist Sutras, Laws, and Treatises) and the Classification. The results suggest that there will be no problem if they follow the organization and system of the Goryeo Tripitaka in deciding the directions for Hangul Tripitaka. Given that the original purport of the Tripitaka and Classification was to understand the words of Buddha as part of Buddhist methodology, it`s required to change the existing perception of the Classification. If the realistic wall for the Oshiseol is still high, however, those following alternatives can be pursued: First, it`s a good idea to adopt the doctrine of Classification by Great Buddhist Priest Wonhyo in order to have all the aspects as a Korean Tripitaka. But there are a couple of issues to be taken care of first; his writings are not whole today; it`s not easy to decide his doctrine of Classification based on a few of his writings; and most of all, there is no consistent doctrine of Classification. Secondly, you can organize Tripitaka in a systematic way by using the Oshipalgyoseol by Buddhist Priest Jegwan in Goryeo. However, it will be extremely difficult to overcome the limitations deriving from the Classification of Tien-tai Buddhism. And finally, there is the final option of using the list by the Most Revered Priest Uicheon. Even though the list was not used in the Goryeo Tripitaka, it can be a good approach to organize Jangso around Gyeongrok like the list based on the asstumption that the Hangul Tripitaka is an imitation of the Goryeo Tripitaka. But the Sinpyin chejong kyojang chongnok (or the Uicheon List) is problematic with the Samjang organization as it`s a collection of the Gyojang of Jejong. In short, there are several problems to deal with when applying the doctrine of Classification by Wonhyo or Jegwan and the list by Uicheon right to the organization of the Hangul Tripitaka. However, the active utilization of the doctrine of Classification by our priests can be meaningful in that it can multiply the significance of the Hangul Tripitaka and enhance the pride of the Korean people.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼