미국교육자들의 RTI 인식 및 연구 특성에 대한 문헌 연구 = U.S. Educators’ Perceptions on RTI and Characteristics of Each Study through a Literature Review

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study explored how U.S. educators perceived Response to Intervention (RTI) through literature review. In addition, the characteristics of subjects, purposes, and journals of each study were reviewed. A total of 14 studies related to U.S. educators’ perceptions on RTI were selected and analyzed. The literature review showed that educators could be categorized into groups such as directors, teachers, and school psychologists. The educators had similar opinions about the advantages and roles of RTI. In particular, educators commonly emphasized that directors, such as administrators or principals, have to lead RTI implementations. However, differences among educators related to the difficulties in the practice of RTI were found. In addition, findings showed that studies related to RTI were published in various journals such as psychology, general education, leadership, and policy. The results of this study suggests that the future research should include various stakeholders and examine their perceptions on the advantages, disadvantages, areas that needs to be improved for South Korea’s RTI improvement. The findings also illustrate that future studies regarding RTI should be published in various academic journal areas such as psychology and policy as well as a learning disabilities field.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 중재반응(RTI)모델에 대하여 미국교육자들이 어떻게 인식하고 있는지에 대하여 문헌을 통해 알아보고자 하였다. 이와 함께 검토한 문헌들에 나타난 연구대상, 연구목적, 학술지들은 어떠한 특성이 있는지를 알아보았다. 미국 교육자들의 RTI 인식과 관련된 문헌들을 검토한 결과 조건에 맞는 논문들은 14편 있었다. 이러한 논문들을 검토한 결과 교육자들은 관리자, 교사, 학교 심리학자로 구분되어졌다. 이러한 교육자들은 RTI의 장점 및 역할과 관련해서는 비슷한 의견을 보여주었다. 특히 교육자들은 공통적으로 행정가나 교장과 같은 관리자들이 선두에 서서 RTI를 이끌어나가야 함을 강조하고 있었다. 하지만 RTI의 실행 과정에서의 어려운 부분과 관련해서는 교육자들 간에 차이가 있었다. 본 연구는 또한 RTI에 관한 연구들은 심리학, 일반교육, 리더십, 정책 등과 같이 다양한 학술지들에서 다루어지고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 이상의 연구 결과는 국내 RTI의 발전을 위해서는 다양한 교육 관계자들을 대상으로 RTI의 장점, 단점, 개선될 부분에 대한 연구가 이루어질 필요가 있음을 보여주고 있다. 또한 RTI를 다루는 연구들은 학습장애와 같은 특정 학술지뿐만 아니라 심리학, 정책과 같은 다양한 학문 분야들에서도 다루어질 필요가 있음을 보여주고 있다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 주삼환, "한국과 미국의 학교장 양성과 전문직적 능력개발에 관한 비교연구" 한국교원교육학회 21 (21): 389-410, 2004

2 서은정, "학습장애 선별절차에서 중재반응(RTI)모형의 실행 필요성과 적용가능성에 대한 초등학교 일반교사들의 인식" 한국학습장애학회 7 (7): 153-170, 2010

3 김흥회, "학교단위 책임 경영제를 통한 단위학교의 책임성 확보: 미국의 사례와 한국에의 시사점" 한국교육행정학회 22 (22): 47-66, 2004

4 이대식, "초등학교 교사들이 인식한 중재-반응(RTI) 접근법의 적용 가능성" 한국특수아동학회 11 (11): 221-235, 2009

5 서유진, "일반교사들과 특수교사들의 중재반응(RTI)모델에 대한 실행 필요성과 가능성 인식정도 차이" 특수교육연구소 9 (9): 39-70, 2010

6 김동일, "수학학습장애 위험아동의 BASA 1년 사례연구: RTI 체제 기반 한국형 CBM 적용을 중심으로" 한국특수교육문제연구소 15 (15): 193-213, 2014

7 여승수, "수학 학습장애 위험군 학생과 일반학생 간의 수학적 자기효능감 비교 연구" 특수교육연구소 12 (12): 207-225, 2013

8 김용욱, "수학 학습곤란 아동의 연산능력 향상과 학습장애 위험학생의 선별을 위한 학교기반 중재반응모델 개발에 대한 연구" 한국특수교육문제연구소 12 (12): 229-260, 2011

9 이대식, "국내 학습장애 분야 이론과 실제의 현황과 과제" 한국학습장애학회 11 (11): 129-158, 2014

10 Werts, M. G., "What special education directors say about RTI" 32 (32): 245-254, 2009

11 Werts, M. G., "What special education directors say about RTI" 32 (32): 245-254, 2009

12 O’Connor, R. E., "Tiers of intervention in kindergarten through third grade" 38 : 532-538, 2005

13 McCombes-Tolis, J., "The preparation of pre-service elementary educators in understanding and applying the terms, concepts, and practices associated with response to intervention in early reading contexts" 21 : 360-389, 2011

14 Stecker, P. M., "Tertiary intervention" 39 (39): 50-57, 2007

15 Greenfield, R., "Teachers’ perceptions to a response to intervention(RTI)reform effort in an urban elementary school : a consensual qualitative analysis" 21 (21): 47-63, 2010

16 Greenfield, R., "Teachers’ perceptions to a response to intervention(RTI)reform effort in an urban elementary school : a consensual qualitative analysis" 21 (21): 47-63, 2010

17 Spear-Swerling, L., "Teachers’ knowledge base for implementing response-to-intervention models in reading" 25 (25): 1691-1723, 2012

18 Castro-Villarreal, F., "Teachers' perceptions and attitudes about Response to Intervention(RTI)in their schools : A qualitative analysis" 40 : 104-112, 2014

19 Castro-Villarreal, F., "Teachers' perceptions and attitudes about Response to Intervention(RTI)in their schools : A qualitative analysis" 40 : 104-112, 2014

20 Wanzek, J., "Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention : Three case studies" 24 (24): 151-163, 2009

21 Hauerwas, L. B., "Specific learning disability and response to intervention : State-level guidance" 80 (80): 101-120, 2013

22 Swanson, E., "Special education teachers’ perceptions and instructional practices in response to intervention implementation" 35 (35): 115-126, 2012

23 Wiener, R. M., "Special Education Administrators' Perspectives on Response to Intervention" 21 (21): 39-45, 2008

24 Little, S., "School Psychologists’ Perceptions Of Stakeholder Engagement In Response To Intervention" 6 (6): 399-408, 2013

25 Bineham, S. C., "Response to intervention : Perspectives of general and special education professionals" 24 (24): 230-252, 2014

26 Rinaldi, C., "Response to intervention : Educators' perceptions of a three-year RTI collaborative reform effort in an urban elementary school" 191 (191): 43-53, 2011

27 Vaughn, S., "Response to instruction as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities" 69 (69): 391-409, 2003

28 Vaughn, S., "Response to early reading intervention examining higher and lower responders" 75 (75): 165-183, 2009

29 Hazelkorn, M., "Response to Intervention : General or Special Education? Who Is Responsible?" 75 : 17-25, 2010

30 McMaster, K. L., "Responding to nonresponders : An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods" 71 (71): 445-463, 2005

31 Sansosti, F. J., "Principals' perceptions of the importance and availability of response to intervention practices within high school settings" 39 (39): 286-295, 2010

32 Sansosti, F. J., "Principals' perceptions of the importance and availability of response to intervention practices within high school settings" 39 (39): 286-295, 2010

33 Sansosti, F. J., "Perspectives of special education directors on response to intervention in secondary schools" 15 (15): 9-20, 2011

34 Sansosti, F. J., "Perspectives of special education directors on response to intervention in secondary schools" 15 (15): 9-20, 2011

35 Wilcox, K. A., "Just‐in‐time pedagogy : teachers' perspectives on the response to intervention framework" 36 (36): 75-95, 2013

36 Kavale, K. A., "Is response to intervention good policy for specific learning disability?" 23 (23): 169-179, 2008

37 "Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA), Pub. L. No. 108-446, 118 Stat. 2647 (2004) [Amending 20 U.S.C. § § 1400 et seq.]"

38 Berkeley, S., "Implementation of response to intervention : A snapshot of progress" 42 : 85-95, 2009

39 Werts, M. G., "Implementation of Tasks in RTI Perceptions of Special Education Teachers" 36 (36): 247-257, 2013

40 Sullivan, A. L., "Examining the changing landscape of school psychology practice : A survey of school-based practitioners regarding response to intervention" 47 : 1059-1070, 2010

41 Kamps, D., "Effects of small-group reading instruction and curriculum differences for students most at risk in kindergarten two-year results for secondary-and tertiary-level interventions" 41 (41): 101-114, 2008

42 Sansosti, F. J., "Barriers and facilitators to implementing response to intervention in secondary schools : Qualitative perspectives of school psychologists" 4 : 1-21, 2010

43 Werts, M. G., "Barriers and Benefits to Response to Intervention: Perceptions of Special Education Teachers" 33 (33): 3-11, 2014

44 Denton, C. A., "An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties" 39 (39): 447-466, 2006

45 Stuart, S., "Agents of change : voices of teachers on response to intervention" 7 (7): 53-73, 2011

46 교육부, "2014 특수교육통계" 국립특수교육원 2014