RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Varieties of Politically Moderate Groups in South Korea: Social Identity, Morality, and Political Attitude

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106114778

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Morality is an appraisal of what is right and what is not. Sociological perspective sees such morality as a product of group identity. In this regard, morality is a useful tool for identifying groups that share different beliefs about right and wrong. Recent studies have found that the root cause of social conflict is based on moral differences related to political attitudes and behaviors. This study focuses on the political moderates that previous studies regarded as lacking ideological or political orientation. However, we found that they are multiple groups composed of groups based on different moral values. We also clarified the differences in political positions according to morality. First, we classified the morality groups in South Korea into five latent groups. In addition to traditional liberals (altruistic individuals) and conservatives (paternalistic), moderates are divided into three moral groups: moral idealists, selfish individuals, and amoral individuals. The moral idealists group emphasizes both moral values that are important to conservatives and liberals. The selfish individuals group is weak in most moral values, and the amoral individuals group does not care about any moral value. In contrast to liberals and conservatives who are consistently aligned left and right in their political positions, the moral qualities of moderates have been found to be complex and dualistic. The fact that moderates are pluralistic in terms of grouping and moral values complicates the conflicts of social and political issues rather than the mere confrontation between conservatism and liberalism.
      번역하기

      Morality is an appraisal of what is right and what is not. Sociological perspective sees such morality as a product of group identity. In this regard, morality is a useful tool for identifying groups that share different beliefs about right and wrong....

      Morality is an appraisal of what is right and what is not. Sociological perspective sees such morality as a product of group identity. In this regard, morality is a useful tool for identifying groups that share different beliefs about right and wrong. Recent studies have found that the root cause of social conflict is based on moral differences related to political attitudes and behaviors. This study focuses on the political moderates that previous studies regarded as lacking ideological or political orientation. However, we found that they are multiple groups composed of groups based on different moral values. We also clarified the differences in political positions according to morality. First, we classified the morality groups in South Korea into five latent groups. In addition to traditional liberals (altruistic individuals) and conservatives (paternalistic), moderates are divided into three moral groups: moral idealists, selfish individuals, and amoral individuals. The moral idealists group emphasizes both moral values that are important to conservatives and liberals. The selfish individuals group is weak in most moral values, and the amoral individuals group does not care about any moral value. In contrast to liberals and conservatives who are consistently aligned left and right in their political positions, the moral qualities of moderates have been found to be complex and dualistic. The fact that moderates are pluralistic in terms of grouping and moral values complicates the conflicts of social and political issues rather than the mere confrontation between conservatism and liberalism.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 석승혜, "한국의 중도집단은 탈도덕적인가?: 이념성향에 따른 도덕성 기반 비교를 중심으로" 한국사회학회 49 (49): 113-149, 2015

      2 류재성, "중도 및 무당파 유권자 특성: 무태도(non-attitudes)인가 부정적 태도(negativity)인가?" 대한정치학회 20 (20): 101-127, 2012

      3 이재호, "정치성향에 따른 도덕판단기준의 차이" 한국사회및성격심리학회 28 (28): 1-26, 2014

      4 조성대, "부동층에 관한 연구: 19대 총선에서 정당선호, 선거쟁점과 투표 결정시기" 한국정치학회 47 (47): 133-153, 2013

      5 남찬섭, "공공성의 재구성과 생활공공성의 등장 : 학교급식과 무상급식의 전개과정을 중심으로" 아세아문제연구소 56 (56): 77-114, 2013

      6 Haidt, Jonathan, "When Morality Opposes Justice:Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize" 20 (20): 98-116, 2007

      7 Hitlin, Steven, "Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links between Two Theories of Self" 66 (66): 118-137, 2003

      8 Wattenberg, Martin, "Turnout Decline in the U.S. and Other Advanced Industrial Democracies" CSD (Center for the Study of Democracy at University of California, Irvine) 1998

      9 Kohut, Andrew, "Trends in American Values 1987-2012: Partisan Polarization Surges in Bush, Obama Years. Resource document" Pew Research Center

      10 Koleva, Spassena, "Tracing the Threads : How Five Moral Concerns(Especially Purity)Help Explain Culture War Attitudes" 46 : 184-194, 2012

      1 석승혜, "한국의 중도집단은 탈도덕적인가?: 이념성향에 따른 도덕성 기반 비교를 중심으로" 한국사회학회 49 (49): 113-149, 2015

      2 류재성, "중도 및 무당파 유권자 특성: 무태도(non-attitudes)인가 부정적 태도(negativity)인가?" 대한정치학회 20 (20): 101-127, 2012

      3 이재호, "정치성향에 따른 도덕판단기준의 차이" 한국사회및성격심리학회 28 (28): 1-26, 2014

      4 조성대, "부동층에 관한 연구: 19대 총선에서 정당선호, 선거쟁점과 투표 결정시기" 한국정치학회 47 (47): 133-153, 2013

      5 남찬섭, "공공성의 재구성과 생활공공성의 등장 : 학교급식과 무상급식의 전개과정을 중심으로" 아세아문제연구소 56 (56): 77-114, 2013

      6 Haidt, Jonathan, "When Morality Opposes Justice:Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize" 20 (20): 98-116, 2007

      7 Hitlin, Steven, "Values as the Core of Personal Identity: Drawing Links between Two Theories of Self" 66 (66): 118-137, 2003

      8 Wattenberg, Martin, "Turnout Decline in the U.S. and Other Advanced Industrial Democracies" CSD (Center for the Study of Democracy at University of California, Irvine) 1998

      9 Kohut, Andrew, "Trends in American Values 1987-2012: Partisan Polarization Surges in Bush, Obama Years. Resource document" Pew Research Center

      10 Koleva, Spassena, "Tracing the Threads : How Five Moral Concerns(Especially Purity)Help Explain Culture War Attitudes" 46 : 184-194, 2012

      11 Lakoff, George, "Thinking Points. Communicating our American Values and Vision" Farrar, Strauss and Giroux 2006

      12 Fanon, Frantz, "The Wretched of the Earth" Grove Press 1968

      13 Haidt, Jonathan, "The Righteous Mind" Pantheon 2012

      14 Bègue, Laurent, "The Psychology of Good and Evil" Oxford University Press 2015

      15 Aron, Raymond, "The Opium of the Intellectuals" Norton 1962

      16 Converse, Philip E., "The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics" 18 (18): 1-74, 1964

      17 Stets, Jan E., "The Moral Self : Applying Identity Theory" 74 (74): 192-215, 2011

      18 Heath, Anthony, "The Measurement of Core Beliefs and Values : The Development of Balanced Socialist/Laissez Faire and Libertarian/Authoritarian Scales" 24 (24): 115-132, 1994

      19 Jost, John T., "The End of the End of Ideology" 61 (61): 651-670, 2006

      20 Bell, Daniel, "The End of Ideology. Vol. 3" Free Press 1960

      21 Campbell, Angus, "The American Voter" Wiley 1960

      22 Campbell, Angus, "Stability and Change in 1960 : A Reinstating Election" 55 (55): 269-280, 1961

      23 Collins, Randall, "Sociological Insight: An Introduction to Non-obvious Sociology" Oxford University Press 1992

      24 Hogg, Michael A., "Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes" Routledge 1988

      25 Woolcock, Michael, "Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework" 27 (27): 151-208, 1998

      26 Kim, Deokyoung, "Sahoe-uisahoehag [Sociology of Society]" Gil 2016

      27 Caeser, James W., "Red over Blue: The 2004 Elections and American Politics" Rowman and Littlefield 2004

      28 Greenberg, Jeff, "Psychological Motives and Political Orientation—the Left, the Right, and the Rigid : Comment on Jost et al. (2003)" 129 : 376-382, 2003

      29 Tedin, Kent L., "Political ideology and the vote" 2 : 63-94, 1987

      30 Freire, Paulo, "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" Continuum 1998

      31 Layman, Geoffrey C., "Party Polarization and “Conflict Extension” in the American Electorate" 46 (46): 786-802, 2002

      32 Dalton, Russell J, "Partisan Mobilization, Cognitive Mobilization and the Changing American Electorate" 26 (26): 274-286, 2007

      33 Klauer, Karl Christoph, "On Belief Bias in Syllogistic Reasoning" 107 : 852-884, 2000

      34 Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics" Macmillan 1962

      35 Miles, Andrew, "Morality and Politics : Comparing Alternate Theories" 53 : 252-269, 2015

      36 Weber, Christopher R., "Moral foundations and heterogeneity in ideological preferences" 34 (34): 107-126, 2013

      37 Lakoff, George, "Moral Politics: How Conservatives and Liberals Think" University of Chicago Press 2002

      38 Durkheim, Emile, "Moral Education" Free Press 1961

      39 Graham, Jesse, "Mapping the Moral Domain" 101 (101): 366-385, 2011

      40 Graham, Jesse, "Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations" 96 (96): 10-29, 2009

      41 Kerlinger, Fred Nichols, "Liberalism and Conservatism: The Nature and Structure of Social Attitudes" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1984

      42 Bobbio, Norberto, "Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction" University of Chicago Press 1996

      43 Abramowitz, Alan I., "Is Polarization a Myth?" 70 (70): 542-555, 2008

      44 Haidt, Jonathan, "Intuitive Ethics : How Innately Prepared Intuitions Generate Culturally Variable Virtues" 133 (133): 55-66, 2004

      45 Kim, Kisok R., "Intuitions and Political Orientation: Similarities and Differences between South Korea and the United States" 111 (111): 173-185, 2012

      46 McCold, Paul, "In Pursuit of Paradigm: A Theory of Restorative Justice" 2003

      47 Cunningham, William A., "Implicit and Explicit Ethnocentrism : Revisiting the Ideologies of Prejudice" 30 (30): 1332-1346, 2004

      48 Apter, David E., "Ideology and Discontent" The Free Press of Glencoe 15-46, 1964

      49 Jost, John T., "Ideology : Its Resurgence in Social, Personality, and Political Psychology" 3 (3): 126-136, 2008

      50 Bartels, Larry M., "Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind" 3 (3): 15-31, 2005

      51 Choi, Hyeon-sook, "Halbaeuitansaeng [The Birth of the Old Man]" Imagine 2016

      52 Gallup Korea, "Gallup Korea Political Index. Gallup Korea Daily Opinion. 58"

      53 이종곤, "Faction Polarization and Ideological Realignment in South Korea" 한국학술연구원 49 (49): 1-23, 2018

      54 Lakoff, George, "Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate:Essential Guide for Progressives" Chelsea Green Publishing Company 2004

      55 Brody, Richard A., "Conservative Parties and Right-Wing Politics in North America" VS VerlagfürSozialwissenschaften 53-77, 2003

      56 Levendusky, Matthew S, "Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters : A Benefit of Elite Polarization" 32 (32): 111-131, 2010

      57 Dalton, Russell J., "Citizen Politics" CQ Press 2006

      58 Oakhill, Jane, "Believability and Syllogistic Reasoning" 31 (31): 117-140, 1989

      59 Kluegel, James R., "Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ views of What Is and What Ought to Be" Transaction Publishers 1986

      60 Hagenaars, Jacques A., "Applied Latent Class Analysis" Cambridge University Press 2009

      61 Downs, Anthony, "An Economic Theory of Democracy" Harper 1957

      62 Lee, Yoonseok, "Advanced Quantitative Analysis of Social Science: Principles and Practice" Seoul National University Press 272-312, 2005

      63 Haidt, Jonathan, "Above and Below Left–right:Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations" 20 (20): 110-119, 2009

      64 Hume, David, "A Treatise of Human Nature" Courier Corporation

      65 Rabinowitz, George, "A Directional Theory of Issue Voting" 83 (83): 93-121, 1989

      66 Jost, John T., "A Decade of System Justification Theory : Accumulated Evidence of Conscious and Unconscious Bolstering of the Status Quo" 25 (25): 881-919, 2004

      67 Sowell, Thomas, "A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles" Basic Books 2007

      68 Chang, Dukjin, "2012nyeon sosyeolseongeo: bunseog-gwajeonmang [2012 Social Election: Analysis and Prospect]" 122 : 11-17, 2012

      69 채진원, "18대 대선, ‘중도수렴 전략’에 중도와 무당파들은 어떻게 반응했나?" 한국사회과학연구회 (88) : 177-213, 2013

      70 이형민, ""Divided Public Opinion on the Jury Trial System of South Korea: An Exploratory Analysis of the Effects of Ideological Orientation and Partisan News Media Exposure"" 한국학술연구원 48 (48): 249-276, 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-03-31 학술지명변경 한글명 : Development and Society -> Journal of Asian Sociology
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Asian Sociology
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.19 0.19 0.18
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.27 0.26 0.452 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼