RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    제약이론과 선형계획이론의 상호 비교 = 제품믹스문제를 중심으로

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to compare linear programming (LP) with the theory of constraints (TOC) as decision making tools. Specifically, since several previous studies which compared LP with the TOC did not provide comparison criterion, the paper compared LP with TOC under three comparison criterion such as logical aptness, superiority of solution, and practical scope. In order to achieve the purpose, this paper formulates three scenarios to find out whether LP is better than the TOC, or vice versa. In each scenario, the comparison focused on the effect of reductions in capacity and demand, demand increase by reducing price, and capacity increase by using overtime on LP and TOC, respectively. The results of the study indicated that LP had the possibility of providing better solution than TOC since TOC made a decision focused on only one constraint. LP also provided easy way of problem solving in the process of obtaining solutions in several scenarios. However, the superiority of solution depended on the value of specific exogenous variable such as overtime.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to compare linear programming (LP) with the theory of constraints (TOC) as decision making tools. Specifically, since several previous studies which compared LP with the TOC did not provide comparison criterion, the paper ...

    The purpose of this study is to compare linear programming (LP) with the theory of constraints (TOC) as decision making tools. Specifically, since several previous studies which compared LP with the TOC did not provide comparison criterion, the paper compared LP with TOC under three comparison criterion such as logical aptness, superiority of solution, and practical scope. In order to achieve the purpose, this paper formulates three scenarios to find out whether LP is better than the TOC, or vice versa. In each scenario, the comparison focused on the effect of reductions in capacity and demand, demand increase by reducing price, and capacity increase by using overtime on LP and TOC, respectively. The results of the study indicated that LP had the possibility of providing better solution than TOC since TOC made a decision focused on only one constraint. LP also provided easy way of problem solving in the process of obtaining solutions in several scenarios. However, the superiority of solution depended on the value of specific exogenous variable such as overtime.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼