RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Understanding the Complexity of Marital Maintenance Process in Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103717940

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The United States has been classified as an individualistic culture where the emphasis of a romantic relationship is on romantic excitement, open communication, and egalitarianism. The Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea) has been described as a collectivistic culture where the emphasis is rather on harmony, implicit communication, and a hierarchical relationship (Gudykunst & Matsumoto, 1996). Korean married couples today, however, are in a unique situation where traditional collectivistic values and modern individualistic values dynamically coexist and conflict. Some studies attempted to address the relational maintenance phenomenon in Korea, but were unable to provide a meaningful examination of Korean relational maintenance by relying on Western-inspired measures and overlooking various cultural aspects of modern Korea. Recent studies conducted in Korea suggest that while Korean married couples highly regard individualistic values such as open communication and similarities in personality, they still tend to prioritize parenting issues over couple issues and concern about proper relational hierarchy. As these kinds of changes and confusions occur at different paces between husbands and wives, and also through generations, the marital maintenance phenomenon among Korean married couples becomes more unique and complex. Clinical implications and directions for future research based on these findings were discussed.
      번역하기

      The United States has been classified as an individualistic culture where the emphasis of a romantic relationship is on romantic excitement, open communication, and egalitarianism. The Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea) has been described as a collec...

      The United States has been classified as an individualistic culture where the emphasis of a romantic relationship is on romantic excitement, open communication, and egalitarianism. The Republic of Korea (hereafter Korea) has been described as a collectivistic culture where the emphasis is rather on harmony, implicit communication, and a hierarchical relationship (Gudykunst & Matsumoto, 1996). Korean married couples today, however, are in a unique situation where traditional collectivistic values and modern individualistic values dynamically coexist and conflict. Some studies attempted to address the relational maintenance phenomenon in Korea, but were unable to provide a meaningful examination of Korean relational maintenance by relying on Western-inspired measures and overlooking various cultural aspects of modern Korea. Recent studies conducted in Korea suggest that while Korean married couples highly regard individualistic values such as open communication and similarities in personality, they still tend to prioritize parenting issues over couple issues and concern about proper relational hierarchy. As these kinds of changes and confusions occur at different paces between husbands and wives, and also through generations, the marital maintenance phenomenon among Korean married couples becomes more unique and complex. Clinical implications and directions for future research based on these findings were discussed.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 남순현, "한국형 결혼관 척도 개발 연구" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 13 (13): 1-27, 2007

      2 구재선, "한국인, 누가 언제 행복한가?" 한국사회및성격심리학회 25 (25): 143-166, 2011

      3 장성숙, "한국문화에서의 부부상담: 현실역동 상담접근" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 12 (12): 117-131, 2006

      4 류정월, "전통 결혼담과 결혼 담론에 나타난 이상적 여성상과 남성상" 한국고전연구학회 24 (24): 391-422, 2011

      5 김미령, "연령대에 따른 여성의 결혼만족도 차이 및 영향요인 비교" 한국가족사회복지학회 26 (26): 35-62, 2009

      6 박은주, "여대생의 직업의식이 결혼 및 출산에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향" 한국가족관계학회 16 (16): 87-105, 2011

      7 김은지, "부부간 유사성 및 일치도가 커뮤니케이션과 결혼만족에 미치는 영향" 한국여성심리학회 15 (15): 403-423, 2010

      8 황민혜, "부부간 결혼가치관 차이, 오해 및 부부갈등: 의사소통의 역할" 한국여성심리학회 15 (15): 779-800, 2010

      9 정윤경, "부모의 부부관계의 질과 자녀세대의 부부적응 및 결혼에 대한 가치관과의 관계" 한국여성심리학회 15 (15): 331-353, 2010

      10 황종귀, "기혼남녀의 결혼만족도와 안정성에 관련된 요인" 한국생활과학회 18 (18): 825-840, 2009

      1 남순현, "한국형 결혼관 척도 개발 연구" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 13 (13): 1-27, 2007

      2 구재선, "한국인, 누가 언제 행복한가?" 한국사회및성격심리학회 25 (25): 143-166, 2011

      3 장성숙, "한국문화에서의 부부상담: 현실역동 상담접근" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 12 (12): 117-131, 2006

      4 류정월, "전통 결혼담과 결혼 담론에 나타난 이상적 여성상과 남성상" 한국고전연구학회 24 (24): 391-422, 2011

      5 김미령, "연령대에 따른 여성의 결혼만족도 차이 및 영향요인 비교" 한국가족사회복지학회 26 (26): 35-62, 2009

      6 박은주, "여대생의 직업의식이 결혼 및 출산에 대한 인식에 미치는 영향" 한국가족관계학회 16 (16): 87-105, 2011

      7 김은지, "부부간 유사성 및 일치도가 커뮤니케이션과 결혼만족에 미치는 영향" 한국여성심리학회 15 (15): 403-423, 2010

      8 황민혜, "부부간 결혼가치관 차이, 오해 및 부부갈등: 의사소통의 역할" 한국여성심리학회 15 (15): 779-800, 2010

      9 정윤경, "부모의 부부관계의 질과 자녀세대의 부부적응 및 결혼에 대한 가치관과의 관계" 한국여성심리학회 15 (15): 331-353, 2010

      10 황종귀, "기혼남녀의 결혼만족도와 안정성에 관련된 요인" 한국생활과학회 18 (18): 825-840, 2009

      11 조혜자, "결혼과 출산기피의 한 이유: 여성의 관계역할" 한국여성심리학회 10 (10): 95-112, 2005

      12 Kim, M. S., "ndividual- vs. culture-level dimensions of individualism and collectivism: effects on preferred conversational styles" 63 : 29-49, 1996

      13 Gottman, J. M., "What predicts divorce?" Erlbaum 1994

      14 Dindia, K., "What partners do to maintain their close relationships, In Close relationships: Function, forms and processes" Psychology Press 305-324, 2006

      15 Keesing, R., "Theories of culture" 3 : 73-79, 1974

      16 McAdams, D. P., "The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self" William Morrow 1993

      17 Gudykunst, W. B., "The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self- construal, and individual values on communication styles across cultures" 22 : 510-543, 1996

      18 Yum, J. O., "The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia" 55 : 374-389, 1988

      19 Ayres, J., "Strategies to maintain relationships: Their identification and perceived deception" 31 : 62-67, 1983

      20 Lee, A. R., "Stability and change in Korean values" 62 : 93-117, 2003

      21 Epstein, N. B., "Relationship standards and marital satisfaction in Chinese and American couples" 31 : 59-74, 2005

      22 Canary, D. J., "Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage" 59 : 243-267, 1992

      23 Merriam, S. B., "Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation" Jossey-Bass 2009

      24 Holtgraves, T., "Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use" 59 : 719-729, 1990

      25 Goodwin, R., "Personal relationships across cultures" Routledge 1999

      26 Medora, N., P., "Perceived attitudes towards romanticism: A cross-cultural study of American, Asian-Indian, and Turkish young adults" 33 : 155-178, 2002

      27 Kim, M. S., "Multicultural perspectives on human communication: Implications for theory and practice" Sage 2002

      28 Stafford, L., "Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale revision, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics" 67 : 306-323, 2000

      29 Spanier, G. B., "Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads" 38 : 15-28, 1976

      30 Stafford, L., "Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics" 8 : 217-242, 1991

      31 Dainton, M., "Maintenance strategies and physical affection as predictors of love, liking, and satisfaction in marriage" 7 : 88-98, 1994

      32 Yum, Y., "Maintaining relationships in Korea and the United States: Features of Korean culture that affect relational maintenance beliefs and behaviors, In Maintaining relationships through communication" Erlbaum 277-296, 2003

      33 Levine, R., "Love and marriage in eleven cultures" 26 : 554-571, 1995

      34 Grice, H., "Logic and conversation, In Syntax and semantics: Vol.3. Speech acts" Academic Press 1975

      35 Choi, H. A., "Korean women and God: Experiencing God in a multi-religious colonial context" Orbis Books 2005

      36 Pak, J., "Korean American women: Stories of acculturation and changing selves" Routledge 2006

      37 Lim, T. S., "Interpersonal relationships in Korea, In Communication in personal relationships across cultures" Sage 122-136, 1996

      38 Buss, D. M., "International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 countries" 21 : 5-47, 1990

      39 Hui, C. H., "Individualism-Collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers" 17 : 222-248, 1986

      40 Triandis, H. C., "Individualism -collectivism" Westview 1995

      41 양옥경, "Family structure and relations" SPRINGER 62-3 : 121-148, 200304

      42 Kagitcibasi, C., "Family and human development across cultures: A view from the other side" Erlbaum 1996

      43 Juang, S. J., "Factors in marital adjustment and their interrelationships: A comparison of Taiwanese couples in America and Caucasian American couples" 19 : 22-31, 1991

      44 Kamo, Y., "Determinants of marital satisfaction: A comparison of the United States and Japan" 10 : 551-568, 1993

      45 Markus, H. R., "Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation" 98 : 224-253, 1991

      46 Yum, Y., "Culture and self-construal as predictors of responses to accommodative dilemmas in dating relationships" 21 : 817-835, 2004

      47 Miller, J. G., "Cultural psychology: Bridging disciplinary boundaries in understanding the cultural grounding of self, In Psychological anthropology" Praeger/ Greenwood 139-170, 1994

      48 Arygle, M., "Cross-cultural variations in relationship rules" 21 : 287-315, 1986

      49 Gudykunst, W. B., "Cross-cultural variability of communication in personal relationships, In Communication in personal relationships across cultures" Sage 19-56, 1996

      50 Yum, Y., "Cross-cultural comparisons of links among relational maintenance behaviors, exchange factors, and individual characteristics in close relationships" Pennsylvania State University 2000

      51 Park, I. H., "Confucianism and the Korean family" 26 : 117-129, 1995

      52 Putnam, L. L., "Communication strategies in organizational conflicts: Reliability and validity of a measurement, In Communication Yearbook 6" Sage 629-652, 1982

      53 Higgins, L. T., "Attitudes to marriage and sexual behaviors: A survey of gender and culture differences in China and United Kingdom" 46 : 75-89, 2002

      54 Bell, R. A., "Affinity-maintenance in marriage and its relationship to women’s marital satisfaction" 49 : 445-454, 1987

      55 Hong, S., "A study on Korean couples' marital satisfaction based on Gottman's theory" 31 : 299-316, 2010

      56 Kim, M. S., "A cross- cultural comparison of implicit theories of requesting" 61 : 210-235, 1994

      57 이훈희, "20-30대 직장여성의 결혼과 출산: 선택의 기로에 선 그녀들의 심경" 한국사회보장학회 27 (27): 123-142, 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2018-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.59 1.59 1.81
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.73 1.74 2.599 0.19
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼