중국과 러시아의 대미 ‘연성균형’과 6자회담 = The Six-Paπy Talks And Soft Balancing toward The United States by China and Russia

국문 초록 (Abstract)

9ㆍ11 사태 이후 미국의 일방주의 외교정책은 지역적ㆍ세계적 수준에서 확대되어 나타나고 있다. 강대국으로의 부상을 계획하는 중국과 화려한 부활을 꿈꾸는 러시아는 미국의 일방주의적 외교정책을 견제하기 위해 다자주의적 해결을 강조하고 있다. 다자주의적 해결은 연성균형(Soft Balancing)전략과 궤를 같이 하는 것인데, 중국과 러시아는 냉전기에 구사하던 경성균형전략을 버리고 미국에 연성균형을 취하고 있는 것이다. 이 글은 중국과 러시아의 연성균형이 어떠한 형태로 나타고 있는지를 살펴보고, 지역기구라 할 수 있는 6자회담을 통한 중국, 러시아의 대미견제 사례와 UN을 통한 대미견제 사례를 분석함으로써 그것의 아시아 안보공동체로의 발전 가능성을 진단하고 있다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the 9/11 accident, United States" unilateral foreign policy has become regional and global phenomenon. China, in an attempt to become a global power, and Russia, who endeavors to redeem her glory, are pursuing a multilateral approach towards solving a global matter to restrain unilateral approach of the United States. Especially, a multilateral approach parallels to a soft balancing strategy. which is a strategic approach implemented by China and Russia. Such attempt clearly makes contrast to that of the Cold War era, when hard balancing strategy was the main approach. The purpose of this study is to analyze various forms of soft balancing strategies implemented by China and Russia. Simultaneously, the study will evaluate the possibility of an inception of Asian Security Community through the case studies such as China and Russia"s attempt to restrain the United States through six-party talks and through the United Nations.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 〈국문요약〉
• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 세력균형과 연성균형
• Ⅲ. 6자회담에서의 중국과 러시아
• Ⅳ. 중국과 러시아의 대미연성균형
• Ⅴ. 맺는 말
• 참고문헌
• 〈English Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "동북아 안보공동체를 위한 시론" 44집 (44집): 2004

2 "동북아 다자안보협력체의 가능성: 북핵 6자회담과 미국의 정책을 중심으로" 13 (13): 2006

3 Moltz, James Clay, "U.S.-Russian Relations and the North Korean Crisis" 45 (45): 2005

4 "The Sino-Russian Partnership and U.S. Policy Toward North Korea: From Hegemony to Concert in Northeast Asia" 49 (49): 2005

5 "The Russia-China Summit in 2005" 51 (51): 2005

6 "The Moscow-Beijing-Delhi ‘Strategic Triangle’: An Idea Whose Time May Never Come" 35 (35): 2004

7 Mikheev, Vassily, "The Korean Issue in Light of September 11 Events" 30 (30): 2002

8 "The Enduring Axioms of Balance of Power Theory" Stanford: Stanford University Press 2004

9 "The Diplomatic Face of China’s Grand Strategy: A Rising Power’s Emerging Choice" 168 : 2001

10 Paul, T. V, "Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy" 30 (30): 2005

11 Pape, Robert A, "Soft Balancing against United States" 30 (30): 2005

12 Yang Seung Ham, "Russo-North Korean Relations in the 2000s: Moscow’s Continuing Search for Regional Influence" 44 (44): 2004

13 "Russia and Northeast Asia: aspirations and reality" 13 (13): 2000

14 "Realism about Russia" The National Interest (65) : 2001

15 Ying, Ding, "Putin’s Visit Bears Fruit" 49 (49): 2006

16 Zhao, Quansheng, "Moving toward a Co-management Approach: China’s Policy toward North Korea and Taiwan" 30 (30): 2006

17 Li, Li, "Meeting of the Minds?" 49 (49): 2006

18 "Launching Another Crisis" 49 (49): 2006

19 "Is the Russia-U.S. Rapprochement Here to Stay" 48 (48): 2002

20 "Iran, China, and Russia: The Emerging Anti-US Nexus?" 32 (32): 2001

21 "In Search of the Korean Peninsula Peace Regime Building" 20 (20): 2005

22 "Hard Times for Soft Balancing" 30 (30): 2005

23 Liangui, Zhang, "Hard Choice" 49 (49): 2006

24 "Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook 2006" Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund 2006

25 "Dancing Duo" 49 (49): 2006

26 Jisi, Wang, "China’s Search for Stability with America" 84 (84): 2005

27 "China’s New Diplomacy" 82 (82): 2003

28 "China, the USA and the South China Sea Conflicts" 34 (34): 2003

29 Roy, Denny, "China and the War on Terrorism" 46 (46): 2002

30 "China and the United States Post-9/11" 47 (47): 2003

31 "China and North Korea: A Fragile Relationship of Strategic Convenience" 10 (10): 2001

32 "China Eyes the Hegemon" 49 (49): 2005

33 Shambaugh, David, "China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order" 29 (29): 2004.5

34 "China Debates Missile Defence" 46 (46): 2004

35 "Can Russia Sustain Its Dominance in Central Asia?" 32 (32): 2001

36 "Beijing’s Dilemma with Taiwan: War or Peace" 18 (18): 2005