RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      e-Learning 환경에서 학습양식과 학습 활동 선호도 및 학습 전략 사용과의 관계 분석 = The analysis of relationships among Learning style, preferences for Learning activities and Learning strategies in e-Learning environment

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75430671

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This research was aimed to analyze the adult learner`s learning styles and their relationships with preferences for learning activities and learning strategies in e-Learning environments. so, adult learners` learning styles according to the Gregorc`s and Grasha-Reichmann`s, the relationships between learning styles and learning preferences, learning strategies were analyzed. Research results were as follows: Many of adult learners were CS or AR types in Gregorc style and the mean score of independent and participant types were little bit higher than collaborative and dependent types in Grasha-Reichmann`s style. Adult learners used elaboration strategy the most and help-seeking the least. Also, the most preferred learning activity was listening to lecture. Relationships among learning styles and preferences of learning activities, and learning strategies, the stronger relations appeared in Grasha-Reichmann`s than Gregorc`s learning style. that is, there was no meaningful differences in preferences of learning activities and learning strategies according to the Gregorc`s learning types but participant and collaborative types in Grasha-Reichmann`s style were meaningful factors to preferences of learning activities, especially, participant type had meaningful effects for individual learning activities such as reading textbook, reflection and listening lecture, collaborative type was influential types for preference of group activities such as discussion and group task. Participant and collaborative types also had a powerful impacts on learning strategies, and independent type influenced on cognitive strategy. These results implied that the characteristics of learning styles could make the differences in influences on use of learning strategies and preference of learning activities. and we should design the various and adaptive learning environments allowing for the learners` learning styles.
      번역하기

      This research was aimed to analyze the adult learner`s learning styles and their relationships with preferences for learning activities and learning strategies in e-Learning environments. so, adult learners` learning styles according to the Gregorc`s ...

      This research was aimed to analyze the adult learner`s learning styles and their relationships with preferences for learning activities and learning strategies in e-Learning environments. so, adult learners` learning styles according to the Gregorc`s and Grasha-Reichmann`s, the relationships between learning styles and learning preferences, learning strategies were analyzed. Research results were as follows: Many of adult learners were CS or AR types in Gregorc style and the mean score of independent and participant types were little bit higher than collaborative and dependent types in Grasha-Reichmann`s style. Adult learners used elaboration strategy the most and help-seeking the least. Also, the most preferred learning activity was listening to lecture. Relationships among learning styles and preferences of learning activities, and learning strategies, the stronger relations appeared in Grasha-Reichmann`s than Gregorc`s learning style. that is, there was no meaningful differences in preferences of learning activities and learning strategies according to the Gregorc`s learning types but participant and collaborative types in Grasha-Reichmann`s style were meaningful factors to preferences of learning activities, especially, participant type had meaningful effects for individual learning activities such as reading textbook, reflection and listening lecture, collaborative type was influential types for preference of group activities such as discussion and group task. Participant and collaborative types also had a powerful impacts on learning strategies, and independent type influenced on cognitive strategy. These results implied that the characteristics of learning styles could make the differences in influences on use of learning strategies and preference of learning activities. and we should design the various and adaptive learning environments allowing for the learners` learning styles.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼