RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    구전활동이 전달자의 감정에 미치는 영향: 구전극성과 구전동기의 역할 = The Impact of Word-of-Mouth Transmission on Communicator`s Affective Responses: The Role of Word-of-Mouth Valence and Motive

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82728767

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Despite its long tradition of research on word-of-mouth (WOM), little is known about the impact of WOM on communicators` responses as opposed to those of recipients. In the early literature, scholars were mainly interested in studying the critical role that WOM played in the diffusion of new products and in examining the influential effects that WOM had on various responses of its recipients(e.g., memory, involvement, attitude). They also suggested several moderators and explored potential mechanisms for those effects. On the other hand, some researchers identified what factors were related to or influenced consumers` intention to engage in WOM(e.g., satisfaction, market maven). To fill this gap in the literature, this research is to investigate how a communicator`s affect will change after compared to before engaging in WOM, using experimental approaches. Specifically, the present study differs from previous ones in (1) dealing with WOM which is more comprehensive post-purchase behavior than complaint, (2) focusing on emotions as a key determinant to a communicator`s post-WOM responses, (3) directly comparing satisfaction and dissatisfaction in a single setting, and (4) proposing the motive of WOM as a moderator. Findings from research on complaint behavior could provide some insights in understanding the research problem. For example, Nyer and Gopinath(2005) found that dissatisfied customers who made a complaint toward the company were less likely to spread negative WOM than those who did not. Also Tax, Brown and Chandrashekaran(1998) showed that if a company addressed complaints of dissatisfied customers in a fair fashion, their loyalty tended to increase (i.e., recovery paradox). Emotions were assumed to play an important role in affecting postcomplaint behavior in those studies(e.g., relief by venting). Thus, we employ emotional regulation as one of the theoretical underpinnings to derive our predictions. Emotional regulation refers to maintaining, expressing and controling emotional states(Gross 1998). It is based on hedonic principle; people are inherently motivated to maintain it when they``re in positive emotions or to recover it toward positive emotions if they``re in negative mood. There are two strategies for maintaining positive mood. First, people do avoid or do not pay attention to any information threatening current positive state. Second, they tend to recall the positive aspects of the event repeatedly(e.g., savoring). On the other hand, negative emotional recovery is closely related to the concept of catharsis suggested by Freud. He argued that psychological recovery could be obtained by venting negative emotions like anger. According to the clinical psychology literature, if an individual exposes the trauma or stressful experiences to others, his cognitive structure will be reconstructed, which reduces the frequency of intrusive thoughts. It is also known that just sharing their experiences with others provides certain benefits and value to people. However, they need to disclose or express their emotions in the communication in order to enjoy the recovery effect. The other relevant construct is accountability that can be defined as the internal expectation to justify individuals` behavior. Accountability also serves as social pressure or anxiety for people to manage their impressions in social contexts(Tetlock 1992). Individuals who feel accountable for their communication tend to follow more complex processing style. Drawing upon emotional regulation theory(i.e. affect maintenance and recovery effects) and the notion of accountability, the authors propose the valence of and motive of WOM as the determinants of the change that occurs to a communicator`s affective responses in the WOM context. The valence of WOM is directly related to appraisal of consumption experience as satisfaction or dissatisfaction, whereas the motive of WOM can be classified to be self-oriented or other-oriented. Self-oriented motives include managing one`s self-image and expressing emotions that consumers have experienced during their purchase or consumption. Other-oriented motives are that consumers engage in WOM to help their friends make the best choice. These discussions lead to the development of hypotheses. Specifically, if satisfied customers engage in WOM for self-oriented motives, they tend to attend to and express their emotions vividly during WOM. Then their positive emotions are reinforced and their self image can be boosted, which leads to increases in positive emotions. However, in other-oriented WOM, consumers would focus on objective information as opposed to emotional information. Moreover, they might feel accountable for the potential consequences of their WOM. These are likely to result in decreases in positive emotions after WOM. On the other hand, if dissatisfied customers engage in WOM by self-oriented motives, expressing and venting their negative emotions would give them the catharsis effect. Their negative emotions are likely to be reduced. For other-oriented WOM in which more factual information is transmitted, communicators would not get much emotional recovery. This combined with the elevated level of accountability would aggravate their negative emotions. We also propose that the amount of emotional disclosures in WOM and communicator``s perceptions of accountability mediate the change of emotions in WOM. We used a 2(the valence of WOM: positive vs. negative) X 2(the motive of WOM: self-oriented vs. other-oriented) X 2(time of emotions: before WOM vs. after WOM) mixed design with the first two as between-subject factors and the last as a within-subject variable. The main dependent variable was WOM communicator`s emotions. In the beginning, participants were asked to recall the most satisfied or dissatisfied consumption incidence that they had recently experienced (i.e., manipulation of WOM valence). And participants` emotional responses were measured about the recalled experience using a scale adapted from CES(Consumption Emotion Set, Richins 1997). An hour later, participants performed a WOM transmission task; they wrote a WOM message about their consumption experiences to their friends. In the instruction for this task, WOM motive was manipulated by using concrete examples of either self- or other-motives. After the WOM transmission, they completed the same scale used earlier for emotional responses. To test the main hypotheses, we ran separate analyses for each valence of WOM; repeated measures ANOVA was performed on the emotional responses with WOM motive as a betweensubjects factor and time of emotions as a within-subjects factor. The analyses produced a significant interaction between WOM motive and emotion time for both valence conditions. As to positive WOM, satisfied participants showed more positive affective responses after(vs. before) engaging in WOM if their WOM motive was self-oriented(4.61 vs. 4.97; F(1,46)=3.81, p<.10), whereas they revealed less positive emotions when their motive was other-oriented (5.01vs.4.57; F(1,46)=6.35, p<.05). As for negative WOM, dissatisfied participants`` emotions became less negative after(vs. before) WOM in self-oriented WOM(3.82 vs. 3.33; F(1,53)= 4.76, p<.05), whereas their negative emotions became stronger after other-oriented WOM(3.72 vs. 4.16; F(1,53)=4.77, p<.05). Regarding amount of emotional exposures in WOM as a potential mediator, first, participants tended to included more emotional expressions in the self- than other-oriented WOM(positive WOM condition: 1.74(self) vs. 0.96(other); F(1,46) =5.63, p<.05; negative WOM condition: 1.68(self) vs. 0.96(other); F(1,53)=7.02, p<.05). In addition, the mediation tests confirmed that the change of emotions could be attributable in part to how much a communicator expressed his feelings in the WOM transmission. The more he exposed, positive emotions became more positive, and negative emotions became less negative. However, accountability could not explain the effect as another mediator. The research findings provide a new perspective and knowledge for better understanding of WOM, and extend emotional regulation theory to the area of WOM. Emotional recovery effect in psychology has typically been examined in the context of strong private feelings like trauma. Our research demonstrate that similar effects could be observed for less intensive emotions like consumption-related ones. Moreover, we formally tested the mediation effects of emotional expressions, which had been mostly assumed in the existing literature. Lastly, we identified the motive of WOM as an important moderator that could be applicable for both positive and negative experiences. These findings also have several implication for managers. It is recommended that firms should not consider only generating positive responses from new customers(i.e., WOM recipient), but also exerting positive influences to existing customers(i.e., WOM communicator) in designing WOM marketing strategies. For example, firms should encourage satisfied customers to express their emotions vividly. Also, they need to devise reward programs for referrals to help WOM communicators relieve the psychological burden including accountability. In addition, appropriate venues or channels should be provided for dissatisfied customers to express their negative emotions easily without being exposed to other consumers.
    번역하기

    Despite its long tradition of research on word-of-mouth (WOM), little is known about the impact of WOM on communicators` responses as opposed to those of recipients. In the early literature, scholars were mainly interested in studying the critical rol...

    Despite its long tradition of research on word-of-mouth (WOM), little is known about the impact of WOM on communicators` responses as opposed to those of recipients. In the early literature, scholars were mainly interested in studying the critical role that WOM played in the diffusion of new products and in examining the influential effects that WOM had on various responses of its recipients(e.g., memory, involvement, attitude). They also suggested several moderators and explored potential mechanisms for those effects. On the other hand, some researchers identified what factors were related to or influenced consumers` intention to engage in WOM(e.g., satisfaction, market maven). To fill this gap in the literature, this research is to investigate how a communicator`s affect will change after compared to before engaging in WOM, using experimental approaches. Specifically, the present study differs from previous ones in (1) dealing with WOM which is more comprehensive post-purchase behavior than complaint, (2) focusing on emotions as a key determinant to a communicator`s post-WOM responses, (3) directly comparing satisfaction and dissatisfaction in a single setting, and (4) proposing the motive of WOM as a moderator. Findings from research on complaint behavior could provide some insights in understanding the research problem. For example, Nyer and Gopinath(2005) found that dissatisfied customers who made a complaint toward the company were less likely to spread negative WOM than those who did not. Also Tax, Brown and Chandrashekaran(1998) showed that if a company addressed complaints of dissatisfied customers in a fair fashion, their loyalty tended to increase (i.e., recovery paradox). Emotions were assumed to play an important role in affecting postcomplaint behavior in those studies(e.g., relief by venting). Thus, we employ emotional regulation as one of the theoretical underpinnings to derive our predictions. Emotional regulation refers to maintaining, expressing and controling emotional states(Gross 1998). It is based on hedonic principle; people are inherently motivated to maintain it when they``re in positive emotions or to recover it toward positive emotions if they``re in negative mood. There are two strategies for maintaining positive mood. First, people do avoid or do not pay attention to any information threatening current positive state. Second, they tend to recall the positive aspects of the event repeatedly(e.g., savoring). On the other hand, negative emotional recovery is closely related to the concept of catharsis suggested by Freud. He argued that psychological recovery could be obtained by venting negative emotions like anger. According to the clinical psychology literature, if an individual exposes the trauma or stressful experiences to others, his cognitive structure will be reconstructed, which reduces the frequency of intrusive thoughts. It is also known that just sharing their experiences with others provides certain benefits and value to people. However, they need to disclose or express their emotions in the communication in order to enjoy the recovery effect. The other relevant construct is accountability that can be defined as the internal expectation to justify individuals` behavior. Accountability also serves as social pressure or anxiety for people to manage their impressions in social contexts(Tetlock 1992). Individuals who feel accountable for their communication tend to follow more complex processing style. Drawing upon emotional regulation theory(i.e. affect maintenance and recovery effects) and the notion of accountability, the authors propose the valence of and motive of WOM as the determinants of the change that occurs to a communicator`s affective responses in the WOM context. The valence of WOM is directly related to appraisal of consumption experience as satisfaction or dissatisfaction, whereas the motive of WOM can be classified to be self-oriented or other-oriented. Self-oriented motives include managing one`s self-image and expressing emotions that consumers have experienced during their purchase or consumption. Other-oriented motives are that consumers engage in WOM to help their friends make the best choice. These discussions lead to the development of hypotheses. Specifically, if satisfied customers engage in WOM for self-oriented motives, they tend to attend to and express their emotions vividly during WOM. Then their positive emotions are reinforced and their self image can be boosted, which leads to increases in positive emotions. However, in other-oriented WOM, consumers would focus on objective information as opposed to emotional information. Moreover, they might feel accountable for the potential consequences of their WOM. These are likely to result in decreases in positive emotions after WOM. On the other hand, if dissatisfied customers engage in WOM by self-oriented motives, expressing and venting their negative emotions would give them the catharsis effect. Their negative emotions are likely to be reduced. For other-oriented WOM in which more factual information is transmitted, communicators would not get much emotional recovery. This combined with the elevated level of accountability would aggravate their negative emotions. We also propose that the amount of emotional disclosures in WOM and communicator``s perceptions of accountability mediate the change of emotions in WOM. We used a 2(the valence of WOM: positive vs. negative) X 2(the motive of WOM: self-oriented vs. other-oriented) X 2(time of emotions: before WOM vs. after WOM) mixed design with the first two as between-subject factors and the last as a within-subject variable. The main dependent variable was WOM communicator`s emotions. In the beginning, participants were asked to recall the most satisfied or dissatisfied consumption incidence that they had recently experienced (i.e., manipulation of WOM valence). And participants` emotional responses were measured about the recalled experience using a scale adapted from CES(Consumption Emotion Set, Richins 1997). An hour later, participants performed a WOM transmission task; they wrote a WOM message about their consumption experiences to their friends. In the instruction for this task, WOM motive was manipulated by using concrete examples of either self- or other-motives. After the WOM transmission, they completed the same scale used earlier for emotional responses. To test the main hypotheses, we ran separate analyses for each valence of WOM; repeated measures ANOVA was performed on the emotional responses with WOM motive as a betweensubjects factor and time of emotions as a within-subjects factor. The analyses produced a significant interaction between WOM motive and emotion time for both valence conditions. As to positive WOM, satisfied participants showed more positive affective responses after(vs. before) engaging in WOM if their WOM motive was self-oriented(4.61 vs. 4.97; F(1,46)=3.81, p<.10), whereas they revealed less positive emotions when their motive was other-oriented (5.01vs.4.57; F(1,46)=6.35, p<.05). As for negative WOM, dissatisfied participants`` emotions became less negative after(vs. before) WOM in self-oriented WOM(3.82 vs. 3.33; F(1,53)= 4.76, p<.05), whereas their negative emotions became stronger after other-oriented WOM(3.72 vs. 4.16; F(1,53)=4.77, p<.05). Regarding amount of emotional exposures in WOM as a potential mediator, first, participants tended to included more emotional expressions in the self- than other-oriented WOM(positive WOM condition: 1.74(self) vs. 0.96(other); F(1,46) =5.63, p<.05; negative WOM condition: 1.68(self) vs. 0.96(other); F(1,53)=7.02, p<.05). In addition, the mediation tests confirmed that the change of emotions could be attributable in part to how much a communicator expressed his feelings in the WOM transmission. The more he exposed, positive emotions became more positive, and negative emotions became less negative. However, accountability could not explain the effect as another mediator. The research findings provide a new perspective and knowledge for better understanding of WOM, and extend emotional regulation theory to the area of WOM. Emotional recovery effect in psychology has typically been examined in the context of strong private feelings like trauma. Our research demonstrate that similar effects could be observed for less intensive emotions like consumption-related ones. Moreover, we formally tested the mediation effects of emotional expressions, which had been mostly assumed in the existing literature. Lastly, we identified the motive of WOM as an important moderator that could be applicable for both positive and negative experiences. These findings also have several implication for managers. It is recommended that firms should not consider only generating positive responses from new customers(i.e., WOM recipient), but also exerting positive influences to existing customers(i.e., WOM communicator) in designing WOM marketing strategies. For example, firms should encourage satisfied customers to express their emotions vividly. Also, they need to devise reward programs for referrals to help WOM communicators relieve the psychological burden including accountability. In addition, appropriate venues or channels should be provided for dissatisfied customers to express their negative emotions easily without being exposed to other consumers.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이은영, "온라인 환경에서의 정보특성이 구전효과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 소비자 제품지식의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국광고학회 16 (16): 145-171, 2005

    2 전성률, "부정적 구전정보의 유형에 따른 구전효과의 차이에 관한 연구" 한국소비자학회 14 (14): 2-44, 2003

    3 김정구, "마케팅활동, 사회적 상호작용, 플로우가 온라인 게임의 애호도와 구전에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구- 온라인 게임의 브랜드매력성과 브랜드일체감의 매개적 영향" 한국마케팅학회 18 (18): 93-120, 2003

    4 양윤, "구전 커뮤니케이션이 소비자의 태도 변화에 미치는 영향" 11 (11): 7-34, 2000

    5 황의록, "구전 커뮤니케이션에 관한 문헌연구" (26) : 55-84, 1995

    6 류강석, "고객추천 보상프로그램이 소비자의 추천의도에 미치는 영향 : 보상유형, 고객-브랜드 관계의 질, 제품사용지위의 역활을 중심으로" 한국마케팅학회 19 (19): 179-196, 2004

    7 Radcliffe, Alison M., "Written-Emotional Disclosure: Testing Whether Social Disclosure Matters" 26 (26): 362-384, 2007

    8 Gelb, Betsy, "Wordof- Mouth Communication: Causes and Consequences" 15 (15): 54-58, 1995

    9 Sheth, Jagdish N., "Word-of-Mouth in Low-Risk Innovations" 11 (11): 15-18, 1971

    10 Sundaram, D. S., "Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis" 25 (25): 527-531, 1998

    1 이은영, "온라인 환경에서의 정보특성이 구전효과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 소비자 제품지식의 조절효과를 중심으로" 한국광고학회 16 (16): 145-171, 2005

    2 전성률, "부정적 구전정보의 유형에 따른 구전효과의 차이에 관한 연구" 한국소비자학회 14 (14): 2-44, 2003

    3 김정구, "마케팅활동, 사회적 상호작용, 플로우가 온라인 게임의 애호도와 구전에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구- 온라인 게임의 브랜드매력성과 브랜드일체감의 매개적 영향" 한국마케팅학회 18 (18): 93-120, 2003

    4 양윤, "구전 커뮤니케이션이 소비자의 태도 변화에 미치는 영향" 11 (11): 7-34, 2000

    5 황의록, "구전 커뮤니케이션에 관한 문헌연구" (26) : 55-84, 1995

    6 류강석, "고객추천 보상프로그램이 소비자의 추천의도에 미치는 영향 : 보상유형, 고객-브랜드 관계의 질, 제품사용지위의 역활을 중심으로" 한국마케팅학회 19 (19): 179-196, 2004

    7 Radcliffe, Alison M., "Written-Emotional Disclosure: Testing Whether Social Disclosure Matters" 26 (26): 362-384, 2007

    8 Gelb, Betsy, "Wordof- Mouth Communication: Causes and Consequences" 15 (15): 54-58, 1995

    9 Sheth, Jagdish N., "Word-of-Mouth in Low-Risk Innovations" 11 (11): 15-18, 1971

    10 Sundaram, D. S., "Word-of-Mouth Communications: A Motivational Analysis" 25 (25): 527-531, 1998

    11 Sen, Shahana, "Why Are You Telling Me This? An Examination into Negative Consumer Reviews on the Web" 21 (21): 76-94, 2007

    12 Garnefeld, Ina, "Walk Your Talk: An Experimental Investigation of the Relationship Between Word of Mouth and Communicators’ Loyalty" 14 (14): 93-107, 2011

    13 Koole, Sander L., "The Psychology of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review" 23 (23): 4-41, 2009

    14 Schachter, Stanley, "The Psychology of Affiliation: Experimental Studies of Sources of Gregariousness" Stanford University Press 141-, 1959

    15 Baron, Reuben M., "The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

    16 Feick, Lawrence F, "The Market Maven: A Diffuser of Marketplace Information" 51 (51): 83-97, 1987

    17 Isen, Alice M., "The Influence of Positive Affect on Acceptable Level of Risk: The Person with a Large Canoe Has a Large Worry" 39 (39): 145-154, 1987

    18 Tetlock, Philip E., "The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward a Social Contingency Model" 25 : 331-376, 1992

    19 Gross, James J., "The Emerging Field of Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review" 2 (2): 271-299, 1998

    20 Chevalier, Judith A, "The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews" 43 (43): 345-354, 2006

    21 Westbrook, Robert A., "The Dimensionality of Consumption Emotion Patterns and Consumer Satisfaction" 18 (18): 84-91, 1991

    22 Whiteley, Richard C., "The Customer Driven Company: Moving from Talk to Action" Addison-Wesley 1991

    23 Tykocinski, Orit E., "The Consequences of Doing Nothing: Inaction Inertia as Avoidance of Anticipate Counterfactual Regret" 75 (75): 607-616, 1998

    24 Lepore, Stephen J., "Talking Facilitates Cognitive-Emotional Processes of Adaptation to an Acute Stressor" 78 (78): 499-508, 2000

    25 Breuer, Josef, "Studies in Hysteria" Beacon Press 1961

    26 Frenzen, Jonathan K., "Structure, Cooperation, and the Flow of Market Information" 20 (20): 360-375, 1993

    27 Rimé, Bernard, "Social Sharing of Emotion: New Evidence and New Questions" 9 (9): 145-189, 1998

    28 Luminet, Olivier, "Social Sharing of Emotion Following Exposure to a Negatively Valenced Situation" 14 (14): 661-688, 2000

    29 Schlenker, Barry R., "Social Anxiety and Self-Presentation: A Conceptualization and Model" 92 (92): 641-669, 1982

    30 Bem, Daryl J., "Self-Perception Theory, In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 6" Academic Press 1-62, 1972

    31 Del Río-Lanza, "Satisfaction with Service Recovery: Perceived Justice and Emotional Responses" 62 (62): 775-781, 2009

    32 Preacher, Kristopher J., "SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models" 36 (36): 717-731, 2004

    33 Schmitt, Philipp, "Referral Programs and Customer Value" 75 (75): 46-59, 2011

    34 Zhao, Xinshu, "Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis" 37 (37): 197-206, 2010

    35 Lyubomirsky, Sonja, "Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change" 9 (9): 111-131, 2005

    36 Westbrook, Robert A., "Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes" 24 (24): 258-270, 1987

    37 Katz, Elihu, "Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications" The free press 1955

    38 King, Charles W., "Overlap of Opinion Leadership Across Consumer Product Categories" 7 (7): 43-50, 1970

    39 Nichols, Michael P., "Outcome of Brief Cathartic Psychotherapy" 42 (42): 403-410, 1974

    40 Wetzer, Inge M., "Never Eat in That Restaurant, I Did!: Exploring Why People Engage in Negative Word-of-Mouth Communication" 24 (24): 661-680, 2007

    41 Kozinets, Robert V., "Networked Narratives: Understanding Word-Of-Mouth Marketing in Online Communities" 74 (74): 1-52, 2010

    42 박수현, "Narratives, mindfulness, and the implicit audience" 11 (11): 147-154, 200406

    43 Wegener, Duane T., "Mood Management Across Affective States: The Hedonic Contingency Hypothesis" 66 (66): 1034-1048, 1994

    44 Richins, Marsha L., "Measuring Emotions in the Consumption Experience" 24 (24): 127-146, 1997

    45 Labroo, Aparna A., "Lay Theories of Emotion Transience and the Search for Happiness: A Fresh Perspective on Affect Regulation" 36 (36): 242-254, 2009

    46 Schellekens, Gaby A. C., "Language Abstraction in Word of Mouth" 37 (37): 207-223, 2010

    47 Zech, Emmanuelle, "Is It Really Helpful to Verbalise One’s Emotions" 27 : 42-47, 1999

    48 Reis, Harry T., "Intimacy as an Interpersonal Process, In Handbook of Personal Relationships: Theory, Research and Interventions" Wiley 367-389, 1988

    49 Diener, Ed, "Intensity and Frequency: Dimensions Underlying Positive and Negative Affect" 48 (48): 1253-1265, 1985

    50 Sheldon, Kennon M., "How to Increase and Sustain Positive Emotion: The Effects of Expressing Gratitude and Visualizing Best Possible Selves" 1 (1): 73-82, 2006

    51 Dichter, Ernest, "How Word-of-Mouth Advertising Works" 44 (44): 147-166, 1966

    52 Strack, Fritz, "Happiness and Reminiscing: The Role of Time Perspective, Affect, and Mode of Thinking" 49 (49): 1460-1469, 1985

    53 Thompson, Ross A., "Emotion Regulation: A Theme in Search of Definition, In The Development of Emotion Regulation: Biological and Behavioral Considerations, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59" 25-52, 1994

    54 Herr, Paul M., "Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective" 17 (17): 454-462, 1991

    55 Nyer, Prashanth U, "Effects of Complaining versus Negative Word of Mouth on Subsequent Changes in Satisfaction: The Role of Public Commitment" 22 (22): 937-953, 2005

    56 Anderson, Eugene W., "Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth" 1 (1): 5-17, 1998

    57 Tax, Stephen S., "Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing" 62 (62): 60-76, 1998

    58 Baum, Andrew, "Control and Intrusive Memories as Possible Determinants of Chronic Stress" 55 (55): 274-286, 1993

    59 Engel, James. F., "Consumer Behavior(8th ed.)" Dryden Press 1993

    60 Pennebaker, James W., "Confronting a Traumatic Event: Toward an Understanding of Inhibition and Disease" 95 (95): 274-281, 1986

    61 Alicke, Mark D., "Complaining Behavior in Social Interaction" 18 (18): 286-295, 1992

    62 Donnelly, Daniel A., "Cognitive and Emotional Changes in Written Essays and Therapy Interviews" 10 (10): 334-350, 1991

    63 Andrade, Eduardo B., "Behavioral Consequences of Affect: Combining Evaluative and Regulatory Mechanisms" 35 (35): 355-362, 2005

    64 Fishbach, Ayelet, "Be Better or Be Merry: How Mood Affects Self-Control" 93 (93): 158-173, 2007

    65 Preacher, Kristopher J., "Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models" 40 (40): 879-891, 2008

    66 Bennett, Roger, "Anger, Catharsis, and Purchasing Behavior Following Aggressive Customer Complaints" 14 (14): 156-172, 1997

    67 Weiner, Bernard, "An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion" 92 (92): 548-573, 1985

    68 Isen, Alice M., "Affect, Accessibility of Material in Memory, and Behavior: A Cognitive Loop" 36 (36): 1-12, 1978

    69 Stenning, Philip C., "Accountability for Criminal Justice" University of Toronto Press 1995

    70 Tetlock, Philip E., "Accountability and Judgment Processes in a Personality Prediction Task" 52 (52): 700-709, 1987

    71 Pennebaker, James W., "Accelerating the Coping Process" 58 (58): 528-537, 1990

    72 류강석, "A penny for your thoughts: Referral reward programs and referral likelihood" 71 (71): 84-94, 200701

    73 Bryant, Fred B., "A Four-Factor Model of Perceived Co" 57 (57): 773-797, 1989

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼