RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    COVID-19 백신 보도의 정치화와 극화: 주요 언론의 사설 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107932520

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Politicization and polarization in the news coverage of science and technology risk issues have recently emerged as a major concern for scientific communication researchers. Politicized and polarized media coverage may turn science/technology-based risk issues into political controversies, leading public opinion divided along a partisan line. In this regard, this study explored how the news coverage of the current pandemic has been politicized and polarized by analyzing the editorials of the COVID-19 vaccines published by the four leading national newspapers(Kyunghyang, Dong-A, Chosun, and Hankyoreh) from January 2020 to June 2021. Specifically, politicization was analyzed as the proportion of strategic frames and that of politicians utilized as major sources. Polarization was examined in terms of how the direction and intensity of the coverage tone differed depending on the partisan affiliation of the target of the news. According to the results of the content analysis, first, the Chosun Ilbo overwhelmingly used the strategic frame, while the rest of the newspapers mainly used issue frames focusing on responsibility and possible alternatives related to vaccine issues. In particular, most of the strategic editorials in the Chosun Ilbo approached the issue of the COVID-19 vaccine as a inter-political debate, rather than as a scientific risk issue. Second, according to the analysis of the patterns of sourcing, the proportion of politicians was much higher than that of medical experts or other scientists in all four newspapers, which is a strong indicator of the politicization of the vaccine coverage. Third, the editorials tone(positive versus negative) was differentiated by the political orientation of the main target of the coverage. This was observed not only within a newspaper but also among newspapers. The implications of the study of were discussed in detail.
    번역하기

    Politicization and polarization in the news coverage of science and technology risk issues have recently emerged as a major concern for scientific communication researchers. Politicized and polarized media coverage may turn science/technology-based ri...

    Politicization and polarization in the news coverage of science and technology risk issues have recently emerged as a major concern for scientific communication researchers. Politicized and polarized media coverage may turn science/technology-based risk issues into political controversies, leading public opinion divided along a partisan line. In this regard, this study explored how the news coverage of the current pandemic has been politicized and polarized by analyzing the editorials of the COVID-19 vaccines published by the four leading national newspapers(Kyunghyang, Dong-A, Chosun, and Hankyoreh) from January 2020 to June 2021. Specifically, politicization was analyzed as the proportion of strategic frames and that of politicians utilized as major sources. Polarization was examined in terms of how the direction and intensity of the coverage tone differed depending on the partisan affiliation of the target of the news. According to the results of the content analysis, first, the Chosun Ilbo overwhelmingly used the strategic frame, while the rest of the newspapers mainly used issue frames focusing on responsibility and possible alternatives related to vaccine issues. In particular, most of the strategic editorials in the Chosun Ilbo approached the issue of the COVID-19 vaccine as a inter-political debate, rather than as a scientific risk issue. Second, according to the analysis of the patterns of sourcing, the proportion of politicians was much higher than that of medical experts or other scientists in all four newspapers, which is a strong indicator of the politicization of the vaccine coverage. Third, the editorials tone(positive versus negative) was differentiated by the political orientation of the main target of the coverage. This was observed not only within a newspaper but also among newspapers. The implications of the study of were discussed in detail.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 주영기, "한국 언론의 신종플루 보도 연구: 진단과 예후 프레이밍을 중심으로" 한국언론학회 55 (55): 30-54, 2011

    2 송현주, "정성 개념의 정교화와 정치 커뮤니이션 연구에서의 함의" 한국언론학회 11 (11): 176-212, 2015

    3 양정혜, "위험사회의 의미 구성하기 -국내 언론의 신종플루 프레이밍 방식 분석" 한국정치커뮤니케이션학회 (17) : 169-212, 2010

    4 김영욱, "위험, 위기 그리고 커뮤니케이션" 이화여자대학교 출판부 2008

    5 심준섭, "원자력발전소 주변 지역주민의 갈등 프레임 분석: 후쿠시마 원전사고의 영향을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 45 (45): 173-202, 2011

    6 정운갑, "원자력 이슈에 대한 언론의 정파성 분석: 조선일보와 한겨레의 비교" 분쟁해결연구센터 14 (14): 5-37, 2016

    7 박주현, "언론의 이념성향에 따른 ‘코로나19’ 보도 프레임 비교 연구" 한국언론학회 64 (64): 40-85, 2020

    8 Daniel Goldstein, "Who Do You Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust in Government for Public Responsiveness to COVID-19" Elsevier BV 2020

    9 Nyhan B., "When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions" 32 (32): 303-310, 2010

    10 Hart, P. S., "Threat Without Efficacy? Climate Change on U.S. News" 36 (36): 325-351, 2014

    1 주영기, "한국 언론의 신종플루 보도 연구: 진단과 예후 프레이밍을 중심으로" 한국언론학회 55 (55): 30-54, 2011

    2 송현주, "정성 개념의 정교화와 정치 커뮤니이션 연구에서의 함의" 한국언론학회 11 (11): 176-212, 2015

    3 양정혜, "위험사회의 의미 구성하기 -국내 언론의 신종플루 프레이밍 방식 분석" 한국정치커뮤니케이션학회 (17) : 169-212, 2010

    4 김영욱, "위험, 위기 그리고 커뮤니케이션" 이화여자대학교 출판부 2008

    5 심준섭, "원자력발전소 주변 지역주민의 갈등 프레임 분석: 후쿠시마 원전사고의 영향을 중심으로" 한국행정학회 45 (45): 173-202, 2011

    6 정운갑, "원자력 이슈에 대한 언론의 정파성 분석: 조선일보와 한겨레의 비교" 분쟁해결연구센터 14 (14): 5-37, 2016

    7 박주현, "언론의 이념성향에 따른 ‘코로나19’ 보도 프레임 비교 연구" 한국언론학회 64 (64): 40-85, 2020

    8 Daniel Goldstein, "Who Do You Trust? The Consequences of Partisanship and Trust in Government for Public Responsiveness to COVID-19" Elsevier BV 2020

    9 Nyhan B., "When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions" 32 (32): 303-310, 2010

    10 Hart, P. S., "Threat Without Efficacy? Climate Change on U.S. News" 36 (36): 325-351, 2014

    11 Gitlin, T., "The Whole World is Watching" University of California Press 1980

    12 Dunlap, R. E., "The Political Divide on Climate Change: Partisan Polarization Widens in the US. Environment" 58 : 4-23, 2016

    13 Rekker R., "The Nature and Origins of Political Polarization over Science" 30 (30): 352-368, 2021

    14 Bolsen, T., "The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion" 36 (36): 235-262, 2014

    15 Valkenburg, P. M., "The Effects of News Frames on Readers' Thoughts and Recall" 26 (26): 550-569, 1999

    16 Cappella, J. N., "The Cognitive Bases for Framing Effects" Oxford University Press 1997

    17 Iyengar, S., "Television News and Citizen’s Explanations of National Affairs" 81 : 815-831, 1987

    18 진달용, "TV 뉴스의 과학기술위험 보도태도 분석 : 부안과 경주 방폐장 TV뉴스 분석을 중심으로" 사단법인 언론과 사회 20 (20): 5-45, 2012

    19 Klemm, C., "Swine Flu and Hype: A Systematic Review of Media Dramatization of the H1N1 Influenza Pandemic" 19 (19): 1-20, 2016

    20 Sears, D. O., "Selective Exposure to Information : A Critical Review" 31 (31): 194-213, 1967

    21 Beck, U., "Risk Society : Towards a New Modernity" Sage 1992

    22 Wilkins, L., "Risk Analysis and the Construction of News" 37 (37): 80-92, 1987

    23 Pew Research Center, "Republicans Remain Far Less Likely than Democrats to View COVID-19 as a Major Threat to Public Health"

    24 Iyengar, S., "Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use" 59 (59): 19-39, 2009

    25 Prior, M., "Post-broadcast Democracy : How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Plitical Involvement and Polarizes Elections" Cambridge University Press 2007

    26 Chinn, S., "Politicization and Polarization in Climate Change News Content, 1985-2017" 42 (42): 112-129, 2020

    27 Hart, P. S., "Politicization and Polarization in COVID-19 News Coverage" 42 (42): 679-697, 2020

    28 Slothuus, R., "Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Issue Framing Effects" 72 (72): 630-645, 2010

    29 Marcus Painter, "Political Beliefs affect Compliance with COVID-19 Social Distancing Orders" Elsevier BV 2020

    30 Feldman, L., "Polarizing news? Representations of Threa and ㅜEfficacy in Leading US Newspapers' Coverage of Climate Change" 26 (26): 481-497, 2015

    31 Allcott, H., "Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing during the Coronavirus Pandemic" NBER 2020

    32 Gadarian, S. K., "Partisanship, Health Behavior, and Policy Attitudes in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic" 2020

    33 Brüggemann, M., "Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication" Oxford University Press 2017

    34 Patterson, T., "Out of Order" Vintage Books 1993

    35 Druckman J. N., "No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions" 62 (62): 99-112, 2018

    36 Gamson, W. A., "Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power" 95 : 1-37, 1989

    37 Wimmer, R. D., "Mass Media Research: An Introduction" Wadsworth 1997

    38 Tuchman, G., "Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality" Free 1978

    39 Iyengar, S., "Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues" University of Chicago Press 1991

    40 Dixon, G. N., "Heightening Uncertainty around Certain Science: Media Coverage, False Balance, and the Autism-Vaccine Controversy" 35 : 358-382, 2013

    41 Ungar, S., "Global Bird Flu Communication: Hot Crisis and Media Reassurance" 29 (29): 472-497, 2008

    42 Entman, R. M., "Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm" 43 (43): 51-58, 1993

    43 Scheufele, A., "Framing as a Theory of Media Effects" 49 (49): 103-122, 1999

    44 Semetko, H., "Framing European Politics : A Content Analysis of Press and Television News" 50 (50): 93-109, 2000

    45 Entman, R. M., "Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power" 57 (57): 163-173, 2007

    46 Pan, Z., "Framing Analysis: An Approach to News Discourse" 10 (10): 5-75, 1993

    47 Goffman, E., "Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience" Harvard University Press 1974

    48 Green, J., "Elusive Consensus : Polarization in Elite Communication on the COVID-19 Pandemic" 6 (6): eabc2717-, 2020

    49 Jamieson, K. H., "Echo Chamber : Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment" Oxford University Press 2008

    50 Bolsen, T., "Counteracting the Politicization of Science" 65 : 745-769, 2015

    51 Edelman, M., "Constructing the Political Spectacle" University of Chicago Press 1988

    52 Boykoff., "Climate Change and Journalistic Norms: A Case-Study of US Mass-Media Coverage" 38 (38): 1190-1204, 2007

    53 Koehler, D. J., "Can Journalistic “False Balance” Distort Public Perception of Consensus in Expert Opinion?" 22 : 24-38, 2016

    54 World Health Organization, "COVID-19 Virtual Press Conference"

    55 Bennett, J., "Bringing Science to Life: A Synthesis of the Research Evidence on the Effects of Context-Based and STS Approaches to Science Teaching" 91 : 347-370, 2007

    56 Fallows, J., "Breaking the News: How American Media Undermine Democracy" 85 (85): 43-44, 1996

    57 Sabina Mihelj, "Audience Engagement with COVID-19 News: The Impact of Lockdown and Live Coverage, and the Role of Polarization" Informa UK Limited 1-19, 2021

    58 Gallup, "American’ Face Mask Usage Varies Greatly by Demographics"

    59 Rahn, W. M., "Activation and Application of Political Party Stereotypes : The Role of Television" 13 (13): 195-212, 1996

    60 Festinger, L., "A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance" Stanford University Press 1957

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (기타)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2007-05-07 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국과학기술학연구회 -> 한국과학기술학회
    영문명 : Korean Institute Of Science And Technology Studies -> Korean Association Of Science And Technology Studies
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.7 0.7 0.64
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.66 1.081 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼