경자양안 연구의 현황과 과제 = The Present Status and Problem of the Study on Gyongjayangan in the latter part of Joseon

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Joseon government surveyed by law the national land every 20 years. But From the Japanese invasion (1592-1598) until before the Land Survey (1898-1904) the central government had only surveyed it three times. Among them a land register surveyed in 1720 remains. It is called Gyongjayangan. It reflects the land surveying and registering method of the society then and the real state of land ownership. It was the real state of land ownership that was first noticed. It was recognized as the material which reflected the differentiating form of land ownership according status.
With the deepening of the research, the registering method of owners in Gyongjayangan, neglected in previous studies was deeply researched. As a result, the practices of registering servants instead were identified. This raised the need to review the materials of Gyongjayangan. In recent years comprehensive reviews of various aspects were made. The point of research is as follows.
Above all, the subject and purpose of promoting land survey were analyzed. The political forces that propelled it were Noron, and the opposition forces Namin. The purpose of propelling it was to increase the land tax and overcome the chronic financial crisis.
Next, the analysis of registering form is a important research. In particular, it is noteworthy that the term pointing to the owner in register book reflects the consciousness of land ownership of the society. This shows the possibility that the registering form will be likely to be interpreted as a cultural history.
The methods to research reality of land ownership have also changed, which is to analyze land registers with the help of various materials such as pedigrees and agricultural management documents. In the future the new analyzing methods will be explored according to the research results of registering form.
As mentioned above, the studies on Gyongjayangan deepened considerably in recent years and raised new challenges. New approachs are being explored beyond simple statistical analysis and interpretation of its meaning change from the dimension of socio-economic history to that of socio-culutrual history.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Joseon government surveyed by law the national land every 20 years. But From the Japanese invasion (1592-1598) until before the Land Survey (1898-1904) the central government had only surveyed it three times. Among them a land register surveyed in 1720 remains. It is called Gyongjayangan. It reflects the land surveying and registering method of the society then and the real state of land ownership. It was the real state of land ownership that was first noticed. It was recognized as the material which reflected the differentiating form of land ownership according status.
With the deepening of the research, the registering method of owners in Gyongjayangan, neglected in previous studies was deeply researched. As a result, the practices of registering servants instead were identified. This raised the need to review the materials of Gyongjayangan. In recent years comprehensive reviews of various aspects were made. The point of research is as follows.
Above all, the subject and purpose of promoting land survey were analyzed. The political forces that propelled it were Noron, and the opposition forces Namin. The purpose of propelling it was to increase the land tax and overcome the chronic financial crisis.
Next, the analysis of registering form is a important research. In particular, it is noteworthy that the term pointing to the owner in register book reflects the consciousness of land ownership of the society. This shows the possibility that the registering form will be likely to be interpreted as a cultural history.
The methods to research reality of land ownership have also changed, which is to analyze land registers with the help of various materials such as pedigrees and agricultural management documents. In the future the new analyzing methods will be explored according to the research results of registering form.
As mentioned above, the studies on Gyongjayangan deepened considerably in recent years and raised new challenges. New approachs are being explored beyond simple statistical analysis and interpretation of its meaning change from the dimension of socio-economic history to that of socio-culutrual history.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김용섭, "증보판 조선후기 농업사연구 Ⅰ" 지식산업사 1995

2 오인택, "조선후기의 量案과 토지문서" 부산대학교사학회 20 : 1996

3 최윤오, "조선후기 양안의 기능과 역할. in: 한국사의 구조와 전개" 혜안 2000

4 최윤오, "조선후기 양안상의 토지소유와 그 성격 : 전주부 낭산면 양안을 중심으로" 역사실학회 17·18합 : 2000

5 오인택, "조선후기 신전개간의 성격 : 숙종대 남해현 경자양안의 가경전을 중심으로" 부산대학교사학회 18 : 1994

6 이세영, "조선 숙종대의 양전의 정치학. in: 조선후기 정치경제사" 혜안 2001

7 이영훈, "양안의 성격에 관한 재검토 : 경상도 예천군 경자양안의 사례분석" 역사학회 102 : 1984

8 염정섭, "숙종대 후반 양전론의 추이와 경자양전의 성격" 한국역사연구회 36 : 2000

9 송찬섭, "숙종대 재정 추이와 경자양전" 한국역사연구회 36 : 2000

10 오인택, "숙종대 양전의 추이와 경자양안의 성격" 부산사학회 23 : 1992

11 오인택, "경자양전의 시행조직과 양안의 기재형식" 한국역사연구회 38 : 2000

12 김건태, "경자양전 시기 가경전과 진전 파악 실태 : 경상도 용궁현 사례" 한국역사연구회 36 : 2000

13 김건태, "갑술·경자양전의 성격 : 칠곡 석전 광주이씨가 전답안을 중심으로" 한국역사연구회 31 : 1999

14 이철성, "肅宗末葉 庚子量田의 實態와 歷史的 性格 : 比摠制로의 변화와 관련하여" 역사학연구회 39 : 1991

15 "經國大典"

16 최윤오, "朝鮮後期의 量案과 行審冊" 한국역사연구회 36 : 2000

17 "大典通編"

18 왕현종, "18세기 후반 양전의 변화와 ‘時主’의 성격 : 충청도 회인현 사례를 중심으로" 한국역사연구회 2001

19 김건태, "17-18세기 전답소유규모의 영세화와 양반층의 대응" 고려사학회 9 : 2000