RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    태양광 발전 시스템의 전역 최대 발전전력 추종을 위한 인공지능 기반 기법 비교 연구 = Comparative Study of Artificial-Intelligence-based Methods to Track the Global Maximum Power Point of a Photovoltaic Generation System

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108226863

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study compares the performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods under partial shading conditions in a photovoltaic generation system. Although many studies on AI-based MPPT have been conducted, few studies comparing the tracking performance of various AI-based global MPPT methods seem to exist in the literature. Therefore, this study compares four representative AI-based global MPPT methods including fuzzy logic control (FLC), particle swarm optimization (PSO), grey wolf optimization (GWO), and genetic algorithm (GA). Each method is theoretically analyzed in detail and compared through simulation studies with MATLAB/Simulink under the same conditions. Based on the results of performance comparison, PSO, GWO, and GA successfully tracked the global maximum power point. In particular, the tracking speed of GA was the fastest among the investigated methods under the given conditions.
    번역하기

    This study compares the performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods under partial shading conditions in a photovoltaic generation system. Although many studies on AI-based MPPT have been conducted, few...

    This study compares the performance of artificial intelligence (AI)-based maximum power point tracking (MPPT) methods under partial shading conditions in a photovoltaic generation system. Although many studies on AI-based MPPT have been conducted, few studies comparing the tracking performance of various AI-based global MPPT methods seem to exist in the literature. Therefore, this study compares four representative AI-based global MPPT methods including fuzzy logic control (FLC), particle swarm optimization (PSO), grey wolf optimization (GWO), and genetic algorithm (GA). Each method is theoretically analyzed in detail and compared through simulation studies with MATLAB/Simulink under the same conditions. Based on the results of performance comparison, PSO, GWO, and GA successfully tracked the global maximum power point. In particular, the tracking speed of GA was the fastest among the investigated methods under the given conditions.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 M. Seyedmahmoudian, "State of the art artificial intelligence-based MPPT techniques for mitigating partial shading effects on PV systems – A review" 64 : 435-455, 2016

    2 N. Femia, "Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method" 20 (20): 963-973, 2005

    3 J. Teng, "Novel and fast maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic generation" 63 (63): 4955-4966, 2016

    4 K. S. Tey, "Modified incremental conductance algorithm for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions and load variation" 61 (61): 5384-5392, 2014

    5 Robles Algarín C, "Fuzzy logic based MPPT controller for a PV system" (12) : 2036-, 2017

    6 A. Bidram, "Control and circuit techniques to mitigate partial shading effects in photovoltaic arrays" 2 (2): 532-546, 2012

    7 Yousra Shaiek, "Comparison between conventional methods and GA approach for maximum power point tracking of shaded solar PV generators" 90 : 107-122, 2013

    8 K. Ishaque, "An improved particle swarm optimization(PSO)–Based MPPT for PV with reduced steady-state oscillation" 27 (27): 3627-3638, 2012

    9 S. Xu, "A global maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic systems under partially shaded conditions using modified maximum power trapezium method" 68 (68): 370-380, 2021

    10 S. Mohanty, "A New MPPT design using grey wolf optimization technique for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions" 7 (7): 181-188, 2016

    1 M. Seyedmahmoudian, "State of the art artificial intelligence-based MPPT techniques for mitigating partial shading effects on PV systems – A review" 64 : 435-455, 2016

    2 N. Femia, "Optimization of perturb and observe maximum power point tracking method" 20 (20): 963-973, 2005

    3 J. Teng, "Novel and fast maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic generation" 63 (63): 4955-4966, 2016

    4 K. S. Tey, "Modified incremental conductance algorithm for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions and load variation" 61 (61): 5384-5392, 2014

    5 Robles Algarín C, "Fuzzy logic based MPPT controller for a PV system" (12) : 2036-, 2017

    6 A. Bidram, "Control and circuit techniques to mitigate partial shading effects in photovoltaic arrays" 2 (2): 532-546, 2012

    7 Yousra Shaiek, "Comparison between conventional methods and GA approach for maximum power point tracking of shaded solar PV generators" 90 : 107-122, 2013

    8 K. Ishaque, "An improved particle swarm optimization(PSO)–Based MPPT for PV with reduced steady-state oscillation" 27 (27): 3627-3638, 2012

    9 S. Xu, "A global maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic systems under partially shaded conditions using modified maximum power trapezium method" 68 (68): 370-380, 2021

    10 S. Mohanty, "A New MPPT design using grey wolf optimization technique for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions" 7 (7): 181-188, 2016

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.17 0.17 0.2
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.21 0.23 0.361 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼