RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영국 저작재산권의 제한규정에 관한 소고: 공정취급 조항 (fair dealing)을 중심으로 = A Short Note on the Limitations ands Exceptions under the English Copyright Law: focusing on the fair dealing providsions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100647039

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There are many academic articles and textbooks that have been published on the topic of US copyright law in Korea. In contrast, it seems that there is comparatively little research being carried out on UK copyright law and it is rare to find articles or textbooks on the latter. More worryingly, what has been published often gets some basic things about the UK copyright wrong. For example, on the subject of limitations and exceptions to copyright, much has been written about the US law on the fair use exception. In the UK, there is no such thing as a “fair use” exception but there are provisions regarding “fair dealing” with copyright work. However, perhaps due to the similarity in their names, fair use and fair dealing, many people believe that these are similar provisions in content also. Thus when they classify different copyright law limitation and exception regimes around the world, they tend to distinguish between the continental style, with enumerated exceptions and limitations, and the Anglo-American style, the fair use/fair dealing exceptions. This stems from the mistaken belief that the fair use and fair dealing exceptions are alike. In fact, they are as different as continental systems are to the US system. Fair use is a general exception to copyright not limited by specific purpose. Fair dealing is a limited exception available only for certain specified purposes under the law. This article endeavours to clarify the differences between the US fair use regime and the UK’s fair dealing regime so that a more accurate comparative research can be undertaken in order to help develop Korea’s copyright law.
    번역하기

    There are many academic articles and textbooks that have been published on the topic of US copyright law in Korea. In contrast, it seems that there is comparatively little research being carried out on UK copyright law and it is rare to find articles ...

    There are many academic articles and textbooks that have been published on the topic of US copyright law in Korea. In contrast, it seems that there is comparatively little research being carried out on UK copyright law and it is rare to find articles or textbooks on the latter. More worryingly, what has been published often gets some basic things about the UK copyright wrong. For example, on the subject of limitations and exceptions to copyright, much has been written about the US law on the fair use exception. In the UK, there is no such thing as a “fair use” exception but there are provisions regarding “fair dealing” with copyright work. However, perhaps due to the similarity in their names, fair use and fair dealing, many people believe that these are similar provisions in content also. Thus when they classify different copyright law limitation and exception regimes around the world, they tend to distinguish between the continental style, with enumerated exceptions and limitations, and the Anglo-American style, the fair use/fair dealing exceptions. This stems from the mistaken belief that the fair use and fair dealing exceptions are alike. In fact, they are as different as continental systems are to the US system. Fair use is a general exception to copyright not limited by specific purpose. Fair dealing is a limited exception available only for certain specified purposes under the law. This article endeavours to clarify the differences between the US fair use regime and the UK’s fair dealing regime so that a more accurate comparative research can be undertaken in order to help develop Korea’s copyright law.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼