RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      A Blind Side of Security Exceptions?: New Legal Complexities of the “Refusal to Furnish Information” Clause = A Blind Side of Security Exceptions?: New Legal Complexities of the “Refusal to Furnish Information” Clause

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107315126

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      National security exceptions clauses in treaties have been receiving heightened attention recently as states are increasingly referring to these provisions to deviate from existing treaty obligations. As disputes increase, jurisprudence on national se...

      National security exceptions clauses in treaties have been receiving heightened attention recently as states are increasingly referring to these provisions to deviate from existing treaty obligations. As disputes increase, jurisprudence on national security exceptions is also being developed and accumulated. States are looking at national security exceptions with keen interest and from a new perspective. This phenomenon is being observed in a variety of treaties. There is a particular provision in national security exceptions clauses that has been sidelined mostly and neglected sometimes in these discussions. This provision is what is called the “refusal to furnish information” clause. It uses broad language without much qualifications or conditions. The level of discretion and leeway accorded to an invoking state is arguably much higher than that granted by other provisions in national security exceptions. As such, this provision can permit a state to refuse to provide any information to any entity in any proceeding. This means this provision could effectively nullify other obligations in the already controversial national security exceptions clauses as well as other ordinary provisions of a treaty. Notably, its invocation could even derail dispute settlement proceedings at international courts. A review of the drafting history of this provision indicates that careful thought has not necessarily been given to its introduction and wording. Nor has there been sufficient debate to date to clarify and tame this provision. The robust attention given to national security exceptions these days indicates that the “refusal to furnish information” provision will be invoked more actively, considering its usefulness in blocking any discussion relating to a treaty. Existing and future treaties need to revisit this provision to ensure it does not become a source of conflict or a carte blanche for a treaty violation.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼