RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    추적권 행사 때 일어나는 제문제* ― 무기사용과 관련하여 ― = To What Extent is the Use of Force Admissible in the Law Enforcement on the Sea?

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104157854

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The present article is to inquire into the extent which in permissible in the use of force on the sea by the coastal state law enforcement agency. In so doing, the present article in divided into 5 chapters. Introduction, is the use of force permissible in the exercise of hot pursuit?, the extent and level of the force, case studies, and conclusion and proposal.
    The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, in the M/V “Saiga” (No.2) case, has held as follows. In considering the force used by Guinea in the arrest of the Saiga, the Tribunal must take into account the circumstances of the arrest in the context of the applicable rules of international law. Although the Convention does not contain express provisions on the use of force in the arrest of ships, international law, which is applicable by virtue of article 293 of the Convention, requires that the use of force must be avoided as far as possible and, where force is unavoidable, it must not go beyond what is reasonable and necessary in the circumstances. Considerations of humanity must apply in the law of the sea, as they do in other areas of international law. Therefore, it is submitted that in the use of force, force must be limited in the ambit of the principles of reasonability and necessity.
    번역하기

    The present article is to inquire into the extent which in permissible in the use of force on the sea by the coastal state law enforcement agency. In so doing, the present article in divided into 5 chapters. Introduction, is the use of force permissib...

    The present article is to inquire into the extent which in permissible in the use of force on the sea by the coastal state law enforcement agency. In so doing, the present article in divided into 5 chapters. Introduction, is the use of force permissible in the exercise of hot pursuit?, the extent and level of the force, case studies, and conclusion and proposal.
    The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, in the M/V “Saiga” (No.2) case, has held as follows. In considering the force used by Guinea in the arrest of the Saiga, the Tribunal must take into account the circumstances of the arrest in the context of the applicable rules of international law. Although the Convention does not contain express provisions on the use of force in the arrest of ships, international law, which is applicable by virtue of article 293 of the Convention, requires that the use of force must be avoided as far as possible and, where force is unavoidable, it must not go beyond what is reasonable and necessary in the circumstances. Considerations of humanity must apply in the law of the sea, as they do in other areas of international law. Therefore, it is submitted that in the use of force, force must be limited in the ambit of the principles of reasonability and necessity.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김찬규, "흑해에서의 미․소 군함의 접촉사건과 국제법"

    2 김찬규, "중국의 영해법과 기선" 17-35, 1994

    3 중앙일보 조인스닷컴, "독도해역 대규모 해경 기동훈련"

    4 Yoram Dinstein, "War"

    5 J. N. Singh, "Use of Force Under International Law"

    6 Alfrecht Randelzhofer, "Use of Force"

    7 J. Ashley Roach, "United States Responses to Excessive Maritime Claims"

    8 See Nicholas M. Poulantzas, "The Right of Hot Pursuit in International Law"

    9 Myres S. McDougal, "The Public Order of the Oceans : A Contemporary Internationnal Law of the Sea"

    10 Malcolm D. Evans, "The Law of the Sea"

    1 김찬규, "흑해에서의 미․소 군함의 접촉사건과 국제법"

    2 김찬규, "중국의 영해법과 기선" 17-35, 1994

    3 중앙일보 조인스닷컴, "독도해역 대규모 해경 기동훈련"

    4 Yoram Dinstein, "War"

    5 J. N. Singh, "Use of Force Under International Law"

    6 Alfrecht Randelzhofer, "Use of Force"

    7 J. Ashley Roach, "United States Responses to Excessive Maritime Claims"

    8 See Nicholas M. Poulantzas, "The Right of Hot Pursuit in International Law"

    9 Myres S. McDougal, "The Public Order of the Oceans : A Contemporary Internationnal Law of the Sea"

    10 Malcolm D. Evans, "The Law of the Sea"

    11 C. John Colombos, "The International Law of the Sea"

    12 G. G. Fitzmaurice, "The Case of the I'm Alone"

    13 C. C. Hyde, "The Adjustment of the I'm Alone Case"

    14 "See text in Law of the Sea Bulletin"

    15 M/V, "SAIGA, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea" Judgment, ITLOS Reports 61-, 1999

    16 Tore Henriksen, "Politics in Ocean Governance : The UN Fish Stocks Agreement and Regional Fisheries Management Regimes"

    17 Military, "Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America)" Merits, Judgment, Ⅰ. C. J. Reports 103-, 1986

    18 Robert Jennings, "Oppenheim's International Law"

    19 Rosemary Gail Rayfuse, "Non-Flag State Enforcement in High Seas Fisheries (2004), p.355. For further see David Anderson, Freedoms of the High Seas in the Modern Law of the Sea"

    20 See Jean-Marie Henckaerts, "Mass Expulsion in Modern International Law and Practice"

    21 Gerhard von Glahn, "Law Among Nations : An Introduction to Public International Law"

    22 Ian Brownlie, "International Law and the Use of Force by States"

    23 Antonio Cassese, "International Law"

    24 Malcolm N. Shaw, "International Law"

    25 J. G. Merrills, "International Dispute Settlement"

    26 J. W. Carner, "Hot Pursuit, Illegal Sinking of Vessel on the High Seas - The I'm Alone Case"

    27 See Peter Seidel, "Encyclopedia of Public International Law"

    28 "Encyclopedia of Public International Law"

    29 bid, "Doctrine of Hot Pursuit : A Functional Interpretation Adaptable to Emerging Maritime Law Enforcement Technologies and Practices"

    30 Peter Malanczuk, "Countermeasures and Self-Defence as Circumstances Precluding Wrongfulness in the International Law Commission's Draft Articles on State Responsibility , United Nation's Codification of State Responsibility"

    31 "Commentary (1) (ⅲ) to Article 47 of the Draft Articles on the Law of the Sea, reproduced in Arthur Watts"

    32 See Zou Keyuan, "China's Marine Legal System and the Law of the Sea"

    33 D. J. Harris, "Cases and Materials on International Law"

    34 Albrecht Randelzhofer, "Article 2 (4), in The Charter of the United Nations : A Commentary" 118-, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2014-10-08 학회명변경 한글명 : 법학연구소 -> 서울시립대학교 법학연구소
    영문명 : 미등록 -> Law Research Institute in University of Seoul
    KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.98 0.98 0.96
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.92 0.87 1.118 0.44
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼