RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      독일제국 시기 시립박물관 설립과 박물관정책 - 베를린의 메르키쉬 지방박물관을 중심으로 - = The Foundation of City Museums and the Policy of City Museum in the German Empire - The ‘Märkisches Provinzial-Museum’ in Berlin -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104172048

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper deals with the history of ‘City Museums’ in the German Empire, especially the first city museum in Berlin, ‘Märkisches Provinzial-Museum (Provincial Museum of the March)’. The city museum that selected and exhibited relics of hometown past was one of the public facilities. How was the city museum established and managed? And did the museum take the appropriate policies for the public? My purpose is to examine whether the city museum was supposed to open to the public and how to fulfill this purpose.
      City Museums had been built from the second half of the nineteenth century, especially after the Unification(1871). The ‘Märkisches Provinzial-Museum’ opened in 1874. In a society that had undergone rapid industrialization and urbanization, the well-educated people and the history associations became interested in the local history. E. Friedel who was a Berlin administrative assistant and a member of the history associations was the first director of the ‘Märkisches Provincial-Museum’.
      The city museum as a public facility pursued educational intentions for every resident and the popularization of the museum. Various groups from a german emperor to labourer had interest in the museum collection plan, so they had donated gifts to the city museum. But the donation policy classified donators into many times-donators or not. The people who have time and money were able to participate in field-surveys. Some visitor-guidelines of the museum (ex. entrance-time, age-limit, neatly-dressed) were the obstacles to popularizing of the museum. So only some city-dwellers visited the museum. For these reasons, I conclude that the ‘Märkisches Provinzial-Museum’ in the German Empire was not a popular public facility.
      번역하기

      This paper deals with the history of ‘City Museums’ in the German Empire, especially the first city museum in Berlin, ‘Märkisches Provinzial-Museum (Provincial Museum of the March)’. The city museum that selected and exhibited relics of homet...

      This paper deals with the history of ‘City Museums’ in the German Empire, especially the first city museum in Berlin, ‘Märkisches Provinzial-Museum (Provincial Museum of the March)’. The city museum that selected and exhibited relics of hometown past was one of the public facilities. How was the city museum established and managed? And did the museum take the appropriate policies for the public? My purpose is to examine whether the city museum was supposed to open to the public and how to fulfill this purpose.
      City Museums had been built from the second half of the nineteenth century, especially after the Unification(1871). The ‘Märkisches Provinzial-Museum’ opened in 1874. In a society that had undergone rapid industrialization and urbanization, the well-educated people and the history associations became interested in the local history. E. Friedel who was a Berlin administrative assistant and a member of the history associations was the first director of the ‘Märkisches Provincial-Museum’.
      The city museum as a public facility pursued educational intentions for every resident and the popularization of the museum. Various groups from a german emperor to labourer had interest in the museum collection plan, so they had donated gifts to the city museum. But the donation policy classified donators into many times-donators or not. The people who have time and money were able to participate in field-surveys. Some visitor-guidelines of the museum (ex. entrance-time, age-limit, neatly-dressed) were the obstacles to popularizing of the museum. So only some city-dwellers visited the museum. For these reasons, I conclude that the ‘Märkisches Provinzial-Museum’ in the German Empire was not a popular public facility.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이동기, "현대사박물관, 어떻게 만들 것인가?―‘독일연방공화국역사의 집’과 ‘대한민국역사박물관’의 건립 과정 비교" 역사문제연구소 (96) : 243-279, 2011

      2 임승휘, "프랑스 ‘문화유산’과 박물관의 탄생" (8) : 9-28, 2004

      3 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말하다" 휴머니스트 2005

      4 김영주, "에피 브리스트" 문학과지성사 2009

      5 Anderson, Benedict, "상상의 공동체" 나남출판 2002

      6 이용일, "베를린민족학박물관과 식민적 코스모폴리타니즘" 문화사학회 (26) : 102-129, 2013

      7 전진성, "박물관의 탄생" 살림 2004

      8 Zola, Emile, "목로주점" 문학동네 2011

      9 송혜영, "나치시대의 미술사와 박물관" 서양미술사학회 (29) : 343-372, 2008

      10 이보아, "관람객과 박물관" 북코리아 2008

      1 이동기, "현대사박물관, 어떻게 만들 것인가?―‘독일연방공화국역사의 집’과 ‘대한민국역사박물관’의 건립 과정 비교" 역사문제연구소 (96) : 243-279, 2011

      2 임승휘, "프랑스 ‘문화유산’과 박물관의 탄생" (8) : 9-28, 2004

      3 전진성, "역사가 기억을 말하다" 휴머니스트 2005

      4 김영주, "에피 브리스트" 문학과지성사 2009

      5 Anderson, Benedict, "상상의 공동체" 나남출판 2002

      6 이용일, "베를린민족학박물관과 식민적 코스모폴리타니즘" 문화사학회 (26) : 102-129, 2013

      7 전진성, "박물관의 탄생" 살림 2004

      8 Zola, Emile, "목로주점" 문학동네 2011

      9 송혜영, "나치시대의 미술사와 박물관" 서양미술사학회 (29) : 343-372, 2008

      10 이보아, "관람객과 박물관" 북코리아 2008

      11 "Verwaltungsbericht des Märkischen Museums zu Berlin" 1910

      12 "Verwaltungsbericht des Märkischen Museums zu Berlin" 1912

      13 "Verwaltungs-Bericht über das Märkische Provinzial-Museum für die Zeit vom 1. April 1886 bis 31. März 1887" 1887

      14 "Verwaltungs-Bericht über das Märkische Provinzial-Museum für die Zeit vom 1. April 1884 bis 31. März 1885" 1885

      15 "Verwaltungs-Bericht über das Märkische Provinzial-Museum für die Zeit vom 1. April 1883 bis 31. März 1884" 1884

      16 "Verwaltungs-Bericht über das Märkische Provinzial-Museum für die Zeit vom 1. April 1882 bis 31. März 1883" 1883

      17 Kunz, Georg, "Verortete Geschichte" 2000

      18 Confino, Alon, "The Nation as a Local Metaphor: Heimat, National Memory and the German Empire, 1871-1918" 5 (5): 42-86, 1993

      19 Kaiserliches Statistisches Amt, "Statistisches Jahrbuch für das Deutsch Reich 1880" 1880

      20 Béringuier, Richard, "Schriften des Vereins für die Geschichte Berlins, Heft XXVIII" 42-73, 1890

      21 Engeli, Christian, "Quellen zum modernen Gemeindeverfassungsrecht in Deutschland" 1975

      22 Silbergleit, Heinrich, "Preussens Städte -Denkschrift zum 100jährigen Jubiläum der Städteordnung vom 19. November 1808" 1908

      23 Borgmann, Karsten, "Museumsinzenierungen. Zur Geschichte der Institution des Kunstmuseums. Die Berliner Museumslandschaft 1830-1990" 94-107, 1995

      24 Joachimides, Alexis, "Museumsinzenierungen. Zur Geschichte der Institution des Kunstmuseums. Die Berliner Museumslandschaft 1830-1990" 1995

      25 Joachimides, Alexis, "Museumsinzenierungen. Zur Geschichte der Institution des Kunstmuseums. Die Berliner Museumslandschaft 1830-1990" 9-14, 1995

      26 Sheehan, James J., "Museums in the German Art World -From the End of the Old Regime to the Rise of Modernism" 2000

      27 Michel, Kai, "Jahrbuch. Stiftung Stadtmuseum Berlin, Bd. II" 180-195, 1996

      28 Dascher, Ottofried, "Heimat Dortmund (125 Jahre Museum für Kunst und Kulturgeschichte)" 3-10, 2008

      29 Direction des Märkischen Provinzial-Museums, "Geschäfts-Anweisung für die Pflegschaft des Märk"

      30 Reulecke, Jürgen, "Essener Beiträge, Bd. 119" 9-24, 2006

      31 Städtisches statisches Amt, "Die Verwaltung der Stadt Essen im XIX. Jahrhundert mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der letzten fünfzehn Jahre: Erster Verwaltungsbericht der Stadt Essen, Bd. I" 1902

      32 Friedel, Ernst, "Die Deutsche Kaiserstadt Berlin. Stadtgeschichten, Sehens- und Wissenswerthes aus der Reichshauptstadt und deren Umgebung" 1882

      33 Märkisches Provinzial-Museum der Stadtgemeinde Berlin, "Denkschrift betreffend das Märkische Provinzial-Museum der Stadtgemeinde Berlin, insbesondere das Raumbedürfniß und die Ausstattung desselben" 1890

      34 Museums-Direktion, "Das Märkische Provinzial-Museum der Stadtgemeinde Berlin von 1874 bis 1899. Festschrift zum fünfundzwanzigjährigen Bestehen" 1899

      35 Saldern, Adelheid von, "City, Museums for the People, and New Media(1900-1933/1934)" 32 : 61-81, 2005

      36 "Bericht über die Gemeinde-Verwaltung der Stadt Berlin in den Jahren 1889 bis 1895" 1898

      37 Esser, Helmut, "Beiträge zur Geschichte Dortmunds und der Grafschaft Mark, Bd. 67" 5-52, 1971

      38 Rübel, Karl, "Beiträge zur Geschichte Dortmunds und der Grafschaft Mark, Bd. 1" 1875

      39 Albrecht, Gustav, "Archiv der “Brandenburgia” Gesellschaft für Heimatkunde der Provinz Brandenburg zu Berlin, Bd. 12" 3-90, 1907

      40 전동호, "19세기 서구 지방 공공박물관의 실태: 영국 워링턴박물관(Warrington Museum) 사례연구" 서양미술사학회 (22) : 35-52, 2004

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.46 0.46 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.35 0.28 0.811 0.58
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼