RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      영국 노동당 정부의 지방정부 사회서비스 전달체계 개혁: 민영화에서 파트너십체계로의 전환 = The Reforms of Labour Government's Local Social Service Delivery System: From Privatisation to Partnership Working

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104663699

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study focuses on reforms of the Labor government's local social service delivery system in Britain which started with the slogan of 'social partnership' in 1997, and on the suggestions for Korean local authorities’ social service delivery system. For these purposes, methods and transitions of the British social service delivery systems and Labor’s reform policies are scrutinized in detail. And then, this study presents some suggestions with the evaluations of the British case.
      The 1997 Labor Government in Britain was elected to power on a pledge to put partnership at the heart of its strategy for modernizing public services. Partnerships are a risk-sharing relationship based upon an agreed aspiration between the public and private (including voluntary) sectors to bring about a desired public policy outcome. For this purpose, the Labor government is moving from an optimistic to a realistic view of partnership, with simple exhortations replaced by a full array of sanctions, incentives and threats.
      Some suggestions for implementing a partnership policy, are as follows: (1) the definitions and practice of partnership should be shared by the stakeholders; (2) The partnership building policy has to be driven forward in the long term view; (3) In order to build the genuine partnership in the local government, revisions of rules and laws and support systems are required; and (4) The Government Offices for the Regions should be provided with a pump-priming fund to reward joint commissioning by groups of local authorities.
      번역하기

      This study focuses on reforms of the Labor government's local social service delivery system in Britain which started with the slogan of 'social partnership' in 1997, and on the suggestions for Korean local authorities’ social service delivery syste...

      This study focuses on reforms of the Labor government's local social service delivery system in Britain which started with the slogan of 'social partnership' in 1997, and on the suggestions for Korean local authorities’ social service delivery system. For these purposes, methods and transitions of the British social service delivery systems and Labor’s reform policies are scrutinized in detail. And then, this study presents some suggestions with the evaluations of the British case.
      The 1997 Labor Government in Britain was elected to power on a pledge to put partnership at the heart of its strategy for modernizing public services. Partnerships are a risk-sharing relationship based upon an agreed aspiration between the public and private (including voluntary) sectors to bring about a desired public policy outcome. For this purpose, the Labor government is moving from an optimistic to a realistic view of partnership, with simple exhortations replaced by a full array of sanctions, incentives and threats.
      Some suggestions for implementing a partnership policy, are as follows: (1) the definitions and practice of partnership should be shared by the stakeholders; (2) The partnership building policy has to be driven forward in the long term view; (3) In order to build the genuine partnership in the local government, revisions of rules and laws and support systems are required; and (4) The Government Offices for the Regions should be provided with a pump-priming fund to reward joint commissioning by groups of local authorities.

      더보기

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      본 연구는 새로운 노동당을 표방하는 영국 정부가 1997년부터 시행해온 파트너십에 의한 지방정부 사회서비스 전달체계 개혁을 분석하여 우리나라 지방자치단체의 사회서비스 전달체계 개편에 있어 고려해야 할 사항들을 지적해 보고자 한다. 이를 위해 먼저, 전통적인 사회서비스 전달체계의 주요 형태들의 특성과 함께 한계점을 살펴본 뒤, 영국 노동당 정부의 파트너십 정책이 등장하게 된 배경을 영국 복지국가의 발달과정을 통해 살펴본다. 또한 1997년 노동당 정부가 집권한 이후 지방정부 사회서비스 전달체계 개혁의 내용을 살펴보고, 정책적 함의를 도출한다. 파트너십체계에 의한 영국의 지방정부 사회서비스 전달체계 개혁에서의 시사점으로는, 파트너십 관계가 무엇인지에 대한 사회저변의 공감대가 형성되어야 하며, 파트너십 구축정책은 장기적으로 추진되어야 하며, 법적정비와 제도적 보완장치 구축 등을 들 수 있다.
      번역하기

      본 연구는 새로운 노동당을 표방하는 영국 정부가 1997년부터 시행해온 파트너십에 의한 지방정부 사회서비스 전달체계 개혁을 분석하여 우리나라 지방자치단체의 사회서비스 전달체계 개...

      본 연구는 새로운 노동당을 표방하는 영국 정부가 1997년부터 시행해온 파트너십에 의한 지방정부 사회서비스 전달체계 개혁을 분석하여 우리나라 지방자치단체의 사회서비스 전달체계 개편에 있어 고려해야 할 사항들을 지적해 보고자 한다. 이를 위해 먼저, 전통적인 사회서비스 전달체계의 주요 형태들의 특성과 함께 한계점을 살펴본 뒤, 영국 노동당 정부의 파트너십 정책이 등장하게 된 배경을 영국 복지국가의 발달과정을 통해 살펴본다. 또한 1997년 노동당 정부가 집권한 이후 지방정부 사회서비스 전달체계 개혁의 내용을 살펴보고, 정책적 함의를 도출한다. 파트너십체계에 의한 영국의 지방정부 사회서비스 전달체계 개혁에서의 시사점으로는, 파트너십 관계가 무엇인지에 대한 사회저변의 공감대가 형성되어야 하며, 파트너십 구축정책은 장기적으로 추진되어야 하며, 법적정비와 제도적 보완장치 구축 등을 들 수 있다.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정정길, "행정학의 새로운 이해" 대명출판사 2003

      2 기획예산처, "시군구 유형별 민관협력체계 실태 및 발전모형에 관한 연구" 기획예산처 2008

      3 최성재, "사회복지행정론" 나남출판 2002

      4 Webb, A., "Whither State Welfare? Policy and Implementation in the Personal Social Services: 1979-80" Royal Institute of Public Administration 1982

      5 Jonathan, G., "Whither Partnership Governance in Northern Ireland? Environment and Planning C" 19 : 751-770, 2001

      6 Ling, T., "Unpacking partnership:the case of health care" Sage Publications 2000

      7 Stanyer, J., "Understanding local Government" Fontana 1976

      8 Zachary, G. P., "Two-edged sword: More public workers lose well-paying jobs as outsourcing grows" 1996

      9 Hills, J., "The Voluntary Sector in Housing:The Role of British Housing Associations,Welfare State Programme paper 20" LSE 1987

      10 Rosenau, P. V., "The Strengths and Weaknesses of Public-Private Policy Partnerships.” In Rosenau, P. V. (ed), Public-Private Policy Partnerships" The MIT Press 2000

      1 정정길, "행정학의 새로운 이해" 대명출판사 2003

      2 기획예산처, "시군구 유형별 민관협력체계 실태 및 발전모형에 관한 연구" 기획예산처 2008

      3 최성재, "사회복지행정론" 나남출판 2002

      4 Webb, A., "Whither State Welfare? Policy and Implementation in the Personal Social Services: 1979-80" Royal Institute of Public Administration 1982

      5 Jonathan, G., "Whither Partnership Governance in Northern Ireland? Environment and Planning C" 19 : 751-770, 2001

      6 Ling, T., "Unpacking partnership:the case of health care" Sage Publications 2000

      7 Stanyer, J., "Understanding local Government" Fontana 1976

      8 Zachary, G. P., "Two-edged sword: More public workers lose well-paying jobs as outsourcing grows" 1996

      9 Hills, J., "The Voluntary Sector in Housing:The Role of British Housing Associations,Welfare State Programme paper 20" LSE 1987

      10 Rosenau, P. V., "The Strengths and Weaknesses of Public-Private Policy Partnerships.” In Rosenau, P. V. (ed), Public-Private Policy Partnerships" The MIT Press 2000

      11 Le Grand, J., "The State of Welfare,In Hills,J.(ed.),The State of Welfare:The Welfare State in Britain Since 1945" Clarendon Press 1990

      12 Travers, T., "The Politics of Local Government Finance" Allen & Unwin 1986

      13 Department of Health, "The NHS Plan:A Plan for Investment,A Plan for Reform,Cm 4818" The Stationery Office 2000

      14 Else, P., "The Management of Public Expenditure" Policy Studies Institute 1979

      15 Ridley, N., "The Local Right:Enabling not Providing" Centre for Policy Studies 1988

      16 Poole, K. P., "The Local Government Services in England and Wales" Allen & Unwin 1978

      17 Plowden,Sir E., "The Control of Public Expenditure.Cm 1432" HMSO 1961

      18 Jossep, B., "The Changing Governance of Welfare: Recent Trends in its Primary Functions, Scale, and Modes of Coordination" 33 (33): 348-359, 1999

      19 Power, M., "The Audit Society" Oxford University Press 1997

      20 Milburn, A., "Speech at the IPPR Launch of the Commission on Public Private Partnerships 20 September"

      21 Timms, E., "Social Networks and Social Service Workers: A Comment Sharkey" 20 : 1990

      22 Department for Education and Skills, "Schools:Achieving Success,Cm 5230" The Stationery Office 2001

      23 Seebohm, E., "Report of the Committee on Local Authority and Personal Allied Social Services. Cmnd 3703" HMSO 1968

      24 Osborne, D., "Reinventing Government:How the Enterpreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector.Reading" Addison-Wesley 1992

      25 Ferrera, M., "Recasting European Welfare States for the 21st Century" Cambridge University Press 2001

      26 Performance and Innovation Unit, "Reaching Out:The Role of Central Government at Regional and Local Level" The Stationery Office 2000

      27 Le Grand, J., "Quasi-Markets and social policy" 101 (101): 1256-1267, 1991

      28 Department of the Environment, "Quality and Choice:A Decent Home for All:The Housing Green Paper" DETR 2000

      29 Wilding, P., "Professional Power and Social Welfare" Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1982

      30 McGregor, G., "Privatization on parade.Health Service journal"

      31 Wood, B., "Privatisation:local government and the health service,In Graham,C.and Prosser,T.(ed.).Waiving the Rules:The Constitution under Thatcherism,Milton" Open University Press 1988

      32 Sako, M., "Price,quality and trust" Cambridge University Press 1992

      33 McKnight, J., "Pressure points: the crisis in management, In Ward, S. (ed.), DHSS in Crisis: Social Security under Pressure and under Review" Child Poverty Action Group 1985

      34 Means, R., "Perspectives on implementation,In Malpass,P.and Means,R.(eds),Implementing Housing Policy" Open University Press 1993

      35 Balloch, S., "Partnership working and practice" The Policy Press 2001

      36 Reijniers, J. J. A. M., "Organization of public-private partnership projects" 12 : 137-142, 1994

      37 Horton, S., "New labour and the management of public services:legacies in Britain" Macmillan 1999

      38 Labour Party, "New Labour:Because Britain Deserves Better" Labour Party 1997

      39 Department of Health, "Modernising the Social Services:Promoting Independence,Improving Protection,Raising Standards,Cm 4169"

      40 Cabinet Office, "Modernising Government,Cm 4310" The Stationery Office 1999

      41 Newman, J., "Modernising Governance:New Labour,Policy and Society" Sage 2001

      42 Department of the Environment, "Modern Local Government:In Touch with the People,Cm 4014" The Stationery Office 1998

      43 Surender, R, "Modern Challenges to the Welfare State and the Antecedents of the Third Way". In Lewis, J. and Surender, R. (eds). Welfare State Change: Towards a Third Way?" Oxford University Press 2004

      44 Clarke, J., "Managing and Delivering Welfare" Blackwell Publishing 2003

      45 Blair, T., "Leading the Way:A New Vision for Local Government" Institute for Public Policy Research 1998

      46 Powell, M., "Introduction", In Glendinning, C., Powell, M. and Rummery, K. (eds.), Partnerships, New Labour and The Governance of Welfare" Bristol:The Policy Press 2002

      47 Huxham, C., "Introducing collaborative advantage" 30 (30): 50-56, 1992

      48 Cohen, N., "How Britain mortgaged the future,New Statesman" New Statesman 1999

      49 Oliver, D., "Government in the United Kingdom: The Search for Accountability, Effectiveness and Citizenship" Open University Press 1991

      50 Moran, M., "From command state to regulator state" 15 (15): 1-13, 2000

      51 Bonoli, G., "European Welfare Futures:Towards a Theory of Retrenchment" Polity Press 2000

      52 Ranson, S., "Education reform:comsumer democracy or social democracy?,In Stewart,J.and Stoker,G.(ed),The Future of Local Government" Macmillan 1989

      53 MacPherson, S., "Department of Health and Social Security,In Harrison,A.and Gretton,A.(eds.).Reshaping Central Government" Policy Journals 1987

      54 Butcher, T., "Delivering Welfare.2nd(ed)" Open University Press 2002

      55 Masterson, M., "Cross-boundary working: A macro-political analysis of the impact on professional roles" 11 (11): 331-339, 2002

      56 Common, R., "Contracting for Care" Jeseph Rowntree Foundation 1992

      57 Klein, R., "Complaints against Doctors:A Study in Professional Accountability" Charles Knight 1973

      58 Hunter, D. J., "Community Care in Britain:Variations on a Theme" King's Fund 1987

      59 Stewart, J., "Change in the management of public services" 70 (70): 499-518, 1992

      60 Commission on Public Private Partnerships, "Building Better Partnerships" Institute for Public Policy Research 2001

      61 Hambleton, R., "Beyond bureaucratic paternalism,In Hoggett,P.and Hambleton,R.(eds.),Decentralisation and Democracy:Localising Public Services,Occasional paper 28" University of Brist 1988

      62 Rhodes, R. A. W., "Beyond Westminster and Whitehall:The Sub-Central Governments of Britain" Unwin Hyman 1988

      63 Cabinet Office, "Better Quality Services:A Handbook on Creating Public-Private Partnerships through Market-Testing and Contracting Out" HMSO 1998

      64 Smith, B. C., "Administering Britain" Martin Robertson 1976

      65 Day, P., "Accountabilities:Five Public Services" Tavistock 1987

      66 Hoggett, P., "A new management in the public sector?.Policy and Politics" 19 (19): 243-256, 1991

      67 Linder, S. H., ""Mapping the Terrain of the Public-Private Policy Partnership."In Rosenau,P.A.(ed.),Public-Private Policy Partnerships,Cambridge" The MIT Press 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.27 1.27 1.23
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.34 1.4 1.372 0.54
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼