RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      비판의 요건으로서의 교양과 실증 그리고 윤리 : 곽광수 교수의 김현 비판 검토, 혹은 김현의 서양이론 변용 알고리즘을 제대로 이해하기 위한 샘풀이 = An Examination about the Kwak kwang-soo’s Criticism Against Kim Hyun

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107195063

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Three months later of the death of Kim Hyun(June 1990), Kwak Kwang-soo, one of companions of the deceased, have criticized the Kim Hyun’s way of the reception and the interpretation of the literary theory and the philosophy of the science of Gaston Bachelard. The main point of his criticism was that Kim Hyun’s comprehension of bachelardian theory had distorted it, caused by the misreading of the arguments of our great philosopher of the imagination. Kwak’s criticism has influenced broadly on the researchers of Korean Literature grounded on the reputation that Kwak was the one who knows most about Bachelard. Furthermore, it has led to the negative evaluation about Kim Hyun’s literary theory. I have not agreed with the Kwak’s assertations even from the first. But considering the properly Asian attitude not to put in the problems between persons that equally had taught me in School, I have kept the silence. However, looking backward last 30 years, I realize, my humble attitude has let the misunderstanding about Kim Hyun’s literary theory spread recklessly and there is an urgent need to rectify this atmosphere. So in this article, I try to prove that Kwak’s insistence against Kim Hyun is absolutely wrong, through three stages of investigation: (1) Wrong construction of the problem by the defective citation from Kim Hyun’s statements; (2) ignorance or misunderstanding of the Key concepts of Bachelardian theory, i.e. ‘deduction’, ‘induction’, and ‘enveloppement’; (3) ignorance about the abundant examples which Bachelard had applied himself of the concept ‘enveloppement’ both in the theory of imagination and in the philosophy of science in Bachelard’s works. I hope that this demonstration serves as momentum where the misunderstanding about the Kim Hyun’s reception of Bachelard would be resolved and the researchers’ weird attitude towards the Occidental theory would be corrected.
      번역하기

      Three months later of the death of Kim Hyun(June 1990), Kwak Kwang-soo, one of companions of the deceased, have criticized the Kim Hyun’s way of the reception and the interpretation of the literary theory and the philosophy of the science of Gaston ...

      Three months later of the death of Kim Hyun(June 1990), Kwak Kwang-soo, one of companions of the deceased, have criticized the Kim Hyun’s way of the reception and the interpretation of the literary theory and the philosophy of the science of Gaston Bachelard. The main point of his criticism was that Kim Hyun’s comprehension of bachelardian theory had distorted it, caused by the misreading of the arguments of our great philosopher of the imagination. Kwak’s criticism has influenced broadly on the researchers of Korean Literature grounded on the reputation that Kwak was the one who knows most about Bachelard. Furthermore, it has led to the negative evaluation about Kim Hyun’s literary theory. I have not agreed with the Kwak’s assertations even from the first. But considering the properly Asian attitude not to put in the problems between persons that equally had taught me in School, I have kept the silence. However, looking backward last 30 years, I realize, my humble attitude has let the misunderstanding about Kim Hyun’s literary theory spread recklessly and there is an urgent need to rectify this atmosphere. So in this article, I try to prove that Kwak’s insistence against Kim Hyun is absolutely wrong, through three stages of investigation: (1) Wrong construction of the problem by the defective citation from Kim Hyun’s statements; (2) ignorance or misunderstanding of the Key concepts of Bachelardian theory, i.e. ‘deduction’, ‘induction’, and ‘enveloppement’; (3) ignorance about the abundant examples which Bachelard had applied himself of the concept ‘enveloppement’ both in the theory of imagination and in the philosophy of science in Bachelard’s works. I hope that this demonstration serves as momentum where the misunderstanding about the Kim Hyun’s reception of Bachelard would be resolved and the researchers’ weird attitude towards the Occidental theory would be corrected.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 정과리, "현대비평, 제 2호" 역락 2019

      2 김 현, "한국문학의 위상/문학사회학, 전집 제 1권" 문학과지성사 1991

      3 김 현, "한국문학의 위상" 문학과지성사 1977

      4 박이문, "하나만의 선택" 문학과지성사 1978

      5 SMOLIN, Lee, "양자 중력의 세 가지 길" 사이언스 북스 2007

      6 박이문, "박이문 전집 제 2권" 미다스 북스 2016

      7 곽광수, "바슐라르 연구" 민음사 1976

      8 정과리, "문신공방 둘-한국문학을 처 읽고 뜯어 읽고 스스럼 있이 꾀꾀로 새겨 넣다" 역락 2018

      9 정과리, "뫼비우스 분면을 떠도는 한국문학을 위한 안내서" 문학과지성사 2017

      10 정영란, "대지 그리고 휴식의 몽상" 문학동네 2002

      1 정과리, "현대비평, 제 2호" 역락 2019

      2 김 현, "한국문학의 위상/문학사회학, 전집 제 1권" 문학과지성사 1991

      3 김 현, "한국문학의 위상" 문학과지성사 1977

      4 박이문, "하나만의 선택" 문학과지성사 1978

      5 SMOLIN, Lee, "양자 중력의 세 가지 길" 사이언스 북스 2007

      6 박이문, "박이문 전집 제 2권" 미다스 북스 2016

      7 곽광수, "바슐라르 연구" 민음사 1976

      8 정과리, "문신공방 둘-한국문학을 처 읽고 뜯어 읽고 스스럼 있이 꾀꾀로 새겨 넣다" 역락 2018

      9 정과리, "뫼비우스 분면을 떠도는 한국문학을 위한 안내서" 문학과지성사 2017

      10 정영란, "대지 그리고 휴식의 몽상" 문학동네 2002

      11 김인순, "꿈의 해석" 열린책들 1997

      12 신동재, "김현의 ‘한국문학의 이념형’ 구체화 작업 연구 - 1971∼1977년의 저작을 중심으로" 국제비교한국학회 28 (28): 47-86, 2020

      13 김 현, "김현 전집 제 9권" 문학과지성사 1991

      14 BACHELARD, "공간의 시학" 민음사 1989

      15 곽광수, "가스통 바슐라르" 민음사 1995

      16 "© 2017 Dictionnaires Le Robert - Le Grand Robert de la langue française"

      17 BACHELARD, "la terre et les rêveries de la volonté" José Corti 1948

      18 SNOW, C. P, "he Two Cultures - with Introduction by Stefan Collini" Cambridge University Press 1998

      19 SMOLIN, Lee, "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" Basic Books 2001

      20 FREUD, Sigmund, "OEuvres complètes XVI, Psychanalyse-1921-1923: Psychologie des masses/ Le moi et le ça/ Autres textes" Presses universitaires de France 1991

      21 FREUD, Sigmund, "OEuvres Complètes-IV. 1899-1900, L'interprétation du rêve" Presses universitaires de France 2003

      22 BACHELARD, "L’expérience de l’espace dans la physique contemporaine" Librairie Félix Alcan 1939

      23 BACHELARD, "Le nouvel esprit scientifique" Presses Universitaires de France, dixième édition 1968

      24 BACHELARD, "Le matérialisme rationnel" P.U.F 1972

      25 BACHELARD, "Le droit de rêver" Presses universitaires de France 1970

      26 BACHELARD, "La terre et les rêveries du repos" Librairie José Corti 1948

      27 BACHELARD, "La psychanalyse du feu" Gallimard 1992

      28 BACHELARD, "La poétique de la rêverie" P. U. F 1960

      29 BACHELARD, "La poétique de l'espace" P. U. F 1957

      30 BACHELARD, "La philosophie du non: Essai d'une philosophie du nouvel esprit scientifique" P.U.F 1966

      31 BACHELARD, "La dialectique de la durée" Presses universitaires de France 1980

      32 BACHELARD, "L'intution de l'instant" Éditions Gonthier 1932

      33 BACHELARD, "L'engagement rationaliste" Presses Universitaires de France 1972

      34 BACHELARD, "L'eau et les Rêves - Essai sur l'imaginaire de la matière" Le Livre de Poche 2012

      35 BACHELARD, "L'air et les songes: Essais sur l'imagination du mouvement" José Corti 1990

      36 BACHELARD, "L e nouvel esprit scientifique" Alcan, douzième édition 1973

      37 ACHELARD, "Gaston, Essai sur la connaissance approchée" J. Vrin 1969

      38 BACHELARD, "Fragments d'une poétique du feu" P.U.F 988

      39 TAKAHASHI, H. K, "Du féodalisme au capitalisme: problème de la transition II"

      40 PERRON, Roger, "Dictionnaire Internationale de la Psychanalyse (A-L)" Calmann-Lévy 2002

      41 BACHELARD, "Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance objective" J. Vrin 1967

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2015-11-09 학술지명변경 한글명 : Comparative Korean Studies -> 비교한국학 Comparative Korean Studies KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.49 0.49 0.42
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.46 0.49 0.818 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼