RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    경제안보시대의 한일 무역 동향에 관한 고찰 = A Study of Korea-Japan Trade in the Age of Economic Security

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108856035

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The G2 friction ignited by the U.S. tariff imposition on China in 2016 gradually intensified, causing the reorganization of the existing global supply chain, and the concept of economic security using economic means to secure its own security is drawing keen attention. Accordingly, this study conducted three analysis of trade trends by item: 1)Korea-Japan trade trends after 2000, 2)trade trends before and after the Korea-Japan trade dispute in 2019, and 3)trade trends by item.
    The results of this study are as follows. First of all, in the case of Korea-Japan trade trends since 2000, the trade volume between Korea and Japan more than doubled compared to 2000, and the trade deficit more than doubled compared to 2000 as exports and imports increased at the same time. 2)In the case of trade trends before and after the 2019 Korea-Japan trade dispute, it can be seen that Korea's exports to Japan increased and imports to Japan decreased after the Korea-Japan trade dispute. However, considering that logistics movement between countries was limited due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the first half of 2020, the above results are unlikely to be a clear basis for the negative impact of the Korea-Japan trade dispute on Korea-Japan trade.3)In terms of trade trends by item, the top 10 items of import and export in 2000, 2012, and 2022 were similar. In particular, the top three items of import and the top two items of export were major trade items between Korea and Japan.
    The significance of this study is as follows. First of all, it analyzes the post-war trade structure trends of Korea-Japan semiconductor export regulations that occurred in 2019. With the importance of economic security increasing, it is very important to understand the impact of the implementation of trade regulation policies of a specific country on trade between the implementing country and the target country. The second point is an analysis of trade trends by item between Korea and Japan. Korea-Japan trade has benefited both countries through interdependence. However, the global trade landscape has changed, especially in the era of economic security, and since each trade item will have different ripple effects on the country's military security and economic sectors, it is expected to be used as a basic analysis survey in establishing trade policies and foreign policies.
    번역하기

    The G2 friction ignited by the U.S. tariff imposition on China in 2016 gradually intensified, causing the reorganization of the existing global supply chain, and the concept of economic security using economic means to secure its own security is drawi...

    The G2 friction ignited by the U.S. tariff imposition on China in 2016 gradually intensified, causing the reorganization of the existing global supply chain, and the concept of economic security using economic means to secure its own security is drawing keen attention. Accordingly, this study conducted three analysis of trade trends by item: 1)Korea-Japan trade trends after 2000, 2)trade trends before and after the Korea-Japan trade dispute in 2019, and 3)trade trends by item.
    The results of this study are as follows. First of all, in the case of Korea-Japan trade trends since 2000, the trade volume between Korea and Japan more than doubled compared to 2000, and the trade deficit more than doubled compared to 2000 as exports and imports increased at the same time. 2)In the case of trade trends before and after the 2019 Korea-Japan trade dispute, it can be seen that Korea's exports to Japan increased and imports to Japan decreased after the Korea-Japan trade dispute. However, considering that logistics movement between countries was limited due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the first half of 2020, the above results are unlikely to be a clear basis for the negative impact of the Korea-Japan trade dispute on Korea-Japan trade.3)In terms of trade trends by item, the top 10 items of import and export in 2000, 2012, and 2022 were similar. In particular, the top three items of import and the top two items of export were major trade items between Korea and Japan.
    The significance of this study is as follows. First of all, it analyzes the post-war trade structure trends of Korea-Japan semiconductor export regulations that occurred in 2019. With the importance of economic security increasing, it is very important to understand the impact of the implementation of trade regulation policies of a specific country on trade between the implementing country and the target country. The second point is an analysis of trade trends by item between Korea and Japan. Korea-Japan trade has benefited both countries through interdependence. However, the global trade landscape has changed, especially in the era of economic security, and since each trade item will have different ripple effects on the country's military security and economic sectors, it is expected to be used as a basic analysis survey in establishing trade policies and foreign policies.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 우혜원, "한일간 무역경쟁력 변화와 구조적 특징 분석" 한일경상학회 94 : 41-60, 2022

    2 김용민 ; 송정현, "한일 정치적 갈등이 무역과 투자에 미치는 영향" 일본학연구소 53 : 73-105, 2021

    3 김도형, "한일 산업내 무역과 경쟁력 격차 요인" 동아시아일본학회 (23) : 13-46, 2007

    4 송정현, "한일 반도체산업 경제안보정책에 관한 연구 -Cooper’s 다차원정책분석모델을 활용한 비교분석-" 동아시아일본학회 (84) : 105-127, 2022

    5 최두원, "한일 무역분쟁에 따른 소재·부품·장비의 품목별 수출입 변화 분석에 관한 연구" 한국무역상무학회 92 : 165-187, 2021

    6 백은영 ; 김형준 ; 오근엽, "한국의 기술무역 사례분석을 통한 기술무역 활성화 방안 연구" 한국디지털무역연구소 17 (17): 87-110, 2019

    7 김용민, "일본의 무역구조 변화에 대한 일고찰" 한국디지털무역연구소 21 (21): 43-60, 2023

    8 김용민 ; 송정현, "아베정권의 엔화 약세에 의한 무역수지 변화" 동북아시아문화학회 1 (1): 243-260, 2019

    9 김양희, "아베노믹스의 이론적 메커니즘과 파급경로의 현실적 작동 가능성" 한국사회과학연구회 (89) : 291-321, 2013

    10 권오경, "상호이익의 한일 무역 50년" 일본학연구소 (17) : 190-210, 2015

    1 우혜원, "한일간 무역경쟁력 변화와 구조적 특징 분석" 한일경상학회 94 : 41-60, 2022

    2 김용민 ; 송정현, "한일 정치적 갈등이 무역과 투자에 미치는 영향" 일본학연구소 53 : 73-105, 2021

    3 김도형, "한일 산업내 무역과 경쟁력 격차 요인" 동아시아일본학회 (23) : 13-46, 2007

    4 송정현, "한일 반도체산업 경제안보정책에 관한 연구 -Cooper’s 다차원정책분석모델을 활용한 비교분석-" 동아시아일본학회 (84) : 105-127, 2022

    5 최두원, "한일 무역분쟁에 따른 소재·부품·장비의 품목별 수출입 변화 분석에 관한 연구" 한국무역상무학회 92 : 165-187, 2021

    6 백은영 ; 김형준 ; 오근엽, "한국의 기술무역 사례분석을 통한 기술무역 활성화 방안 연구" 한국디지털무역연구소 17 (17): 87-110, 2019

    7 김용민, "일본의 무역구조 변화에 대한 일고찰" 한국디지털무역연구소 21 (21): 43-60, 2023

    8 김용민 ; 송정현, "아베정권의 엔화 약세에 의한 무역수지 변화" 동북아시아문화학회 1 (1): 243-260, 2019

    9 김양희, "아베노믹스의 이론적 메커니즘과 파급경로의 현실적 작동 가능성" 한국사회과학연구회 (89) : 291-321, 2013

    10 권오경, "상호이익의 한일 무역 50년" 일본학연구소 (17) : 190-210, 2015

    11 조유진 ; 이창민, "네트워크 분석을 통한 한일 무역관계 고찰: 전기・전자산업을 중심으로" 인문사회 21 13 (13): 3003-3016, 2022

    12 구문수 ; 이윤신 ; 박영수, "국가 간 무역분쟁에 따른 주식시장의 반응: 한일 무역분쟁 사례를 중심으로" 한국생산관리학회 34 (34): 243-257, 2023

    13 向山英彦, "日韓関係が揺らぐなかで懸念される経済関係への影響" 日本研究 14 (14): 2014

    14 野口悠紀雄, "円安で輸出が増えて貿易赤字も減るという経済学の教科書通りにならない理由"

    15 清水順子, "アベノミクスと円安, 貿易赤字, 日本の輸出競争力"

    16 김종선, "2008년 글로벌 금융위기 이후 엔/달러환율과 원/달러환율의 환율변동성의 특성에 관한 분석" 한국무역보험학회 19 (19): 175-198, 2018

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼