RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      사이버 공격에 대한 예방적 자위권의 허용 가능성

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105296189

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Nowadays, the term ‘cyber attack’ is used frequently in mass media, and it has been familiar to the general people, which means that the danger of cyber attack has increased. Accordingly, discussion about these kind of cyber attacks, in other words, about universal criterion at international community to cyberspace continues. There are
      clear differences of the debate about this issue between Western nations and Non-Western nations. Whereas United States and Western nations argue that existing international law can apply to the cyberspace, Non-Western nations including China and Russia argue that new international legal norms like a treaty on cyber attack should be enacted.
      When considering the discussions in the UN GGE that have made up to fourth, it seems that countries around the world agree that the existed international law should be applied to activities in cyberspace. This study is built on taking note of this fact.
      As above mentioned, due to the increased risk of cyber attack and by the character of cyber activities, it has been argued that anticipatory self-defense on cyber attack is needed. To address the matter of the permissibility of anticipatory self-defense on cyber attack, because traditionally the right of self-defense can be exercised by the UN
      Charter Article 51, I studied the recognition of the notion of anticipatory self-defense in this scope and how to apply it to cyber activities.
      To this end, first, the concept of definition about cyber attack should be clarified and the malicious cyber operation is classified into a level that reaches an armed attack and a level that does not. So only in a case of the former, I researched applicable anticipatory self-defense on cyber attack.
      Through these processes, I conclude that we have to recognize anticipatory self-defense on cyber attack. However, it needs the strict limitations and conditions.
      By extension this research is to analyze limitations and problems that can be found of above mentioned process due to characteristics that cyberspace has and present solutions for the problems at the same time.
      번역하기

      Nowadays, the term ‘cyber attack’ is used frequently in mass media, and it has been familiar to the general people, which means that the danger of cyber attack has increased. Accordingly, discussion about these kind of cyber attacks, in other word...

      Nowadays, the term ‘cyber attack’ is used frequently in mass media, and it has been familiar to the general people, which means that the danger of cyber attack has increased. Accordingly, discussion about these kind of cyber attacks, in other words, about universal criterion at international community to cyberspace continues. There are
      clear differences of the debate about this issue between Western nations and Non-Western nations. Whereas United States and Western nations argue that existing international law can apply to the cyberspace, Non-Western nations including China and Russia argue that new international legal norms like a treaty on cyber attack should be enacted.
      When considering the discussions in the UN GGE that have made up to fourth, it seems that countries around the world agree that the existed international law should be applied to activities in cyberspace. This study is built on taking note of this fact.
      As above mentioned, due to the increased risk of cyber attack and by the character of cyber activities, it has been argued that anticipatory self-defense on cyber attack is needed. To address the matter of the permissibility of anticipatory self-defense on cyber attack, because traditionally the right of self-defense can be exercised by the UN
      Charter Article 51, I studied the recognition of the notion of anticipatory self-defense in this scope and how to apply it to cyber activities.
      To this end, first, the concept of definition about cyber attack should be clarified and the malicious cyber operation is classified into a level that reaches an armed attack and a level that does not. So only in a case of the former, I researched applicable anticipatory self-defense on cyber attack.
      Through these processes, I conclude that we have to recognize anticipatory self-defense on cyber attack. However, it needs the strict limitations and conditions.
      By extension this research is to analyze limitations and problems that can be found of above mentioned process due to characteristics that cyberspace has and present solutions for the problems at the same time.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이병오, "천안함 피격사건과 자위권 행사" 국제법평론회 (32) : 141-169, 2010

      2 서철원, "정보전에서 대응하는 무력사용에 관한 연구" 16 : 2006

      3 제성호, "유엔 헌장상의 자위권 규정 재검토 ― 천안함사건에서 한국의 무력대응과 관련해서 ―" 서울국제법연구원 17 (17): 65-93, 2010

      4 김석현, "예방적 자위에 관한 연구" 38 (38): 1993

      5 정인섭, "신국제법 강의" 박영사 2013

      6 박노형, "사이버전의 국제법적 분석을 위한 기본개념의 연구- Tallinn Manual의 논의를 중심으로 -" 대한국제법학회 59 (59): 65-93, 2014

      7 김찬규, "무력공격의 개념 변화와 자위권에 대한 재해석" (29) : 2009

      8 최태현, "국제법상 예방적 자위권의 허용가능성에 관한 연구" 6 : 1994

      9 장신, "국제법상 무력행사금지의 원칙과 자위권" 법학연구소 24 (24): 2007

      10 이병조, "『국제법신강』, 제9개정 보완수정판" 일조각 2007

      1 이병오, "천안함 피격사건과 자위권 행사" 국제법평론회 (32) : 141-169, 2010

      2 서철원, "정보전에서 대응하는 무력사용에 관한 연구" 16 : 2006

      3 제성호, "유엔 헌장상의 자위권 규정 재검토 ― 천안함사건에서 한국의 무력대응과 관련해서 ―" 서울국제법연구원 17 (17): 65-93, 2010

      4 김석현, "예방적 자위에 관한 연구" 38 (38): 1993

      5 정인섭, "신국제법 강의" 박영사 2013

      6 박노형, "사이버전의 국제법적 분석을 위한 기본개념의 연구- Tallinn Manual의 논의를 중심으로 -" 대한국제법학회 59 (59): 65-93, 2014

      7 김찬규, "무력공격의 개념 변화와 자위권에 대한 재해석" (29) : 2009

      8 최태현, "국제법상 예방적 자위권의 허용가능성에 관한 연구" 6 : 1994

      9 장신, "국제법상 무력행사금지의 원칙과 자위권" 법학연구소 24 (24): 2007

      10 이병조, "『국제법신강』, 제9개정 보완수정판" 일조각 2007

      11 Waldock, "the Regulation of use of force by Individual States in International Law" 1952

      12 "http://news.donga.com/3/all/20150921/73763788/1"

      13 "Ukraine says cyber attack on Kyiv airport was launched from Russia" euronews

      14 金奭賢, "UN憲章 第2條 4項의 危機- 그 例外의 擴大와 관련하여 -" 대한국제법학회 48 (48): 3-102, 2003

      15 "The lnternational Law Commission 1949-1998, Vol. II" 1999

      16 Myers McDougal, "The Soviet-Cuban Quarantine and Self-Defense" 57 : 1963

      17 NATO Standardization Agency, "NATO Glossary of Terms and Definitions (AAP-6)"

      18 "Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua V. United States of America)" ICJ 1986

      19 "Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion" ICJ 1996

      20 Katharina Ziolkowski, "Ius ad bellum in Cyberspace – Some Thoughts on the “Schmitt-Criteria” for Use of Force" 2012

      21 "Israeli sky-hack switched off Syrian radars countrywide" the Register

      22 Harold Hongju Koh, "International Law in Cyberspace Remarks as Prepared for Delivery by Harold Hongju Koh to the USCYBERCOM Inter-Agency Legal Conference Ft. Meade, MD, Sept.18, 2012" 54 : 2012

      23 US Department of Defense, "DoD Joint Terminology for Cyberspace Operations(2013)"

      24 US Department of Defense, "DoD Joint Terminology for Cyberspace Operations" 2013

      25 US Department of Defense, "Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms Joint Publication 1-02)"

      26 "Danish Parliament’s website hit by cyber-attack" The Copenhagen Post

      27 Matthew Hoisington, "Cyberwarfare and The Use of Force Giving rise to The Right of Self-Defense" 39 : 2009

      28 "Cyber-attack among World Economic Forum's top global risks" SC Magazine

      29 Michael N. Schmitt, "Cyber Operations and the Jus ad Bellum Revised" 56 : 2011

      30 Laurie R Blank, "CYBERWAR-Law and Ethics for Virtual Conflicts" Oxford University Press

      31 Terry D.Gill, "Anticipatory Self-Defense in the Cyber Context" 89 : 2013

      32 정경수, "21세기 자위에 근거한 무력행사의 적법성" 국제법평론회 (30) : 45-73, 2009

      33 박기갑, "2003년 미국 - 이라크 전쟁과 현대국제법의 과제" 법학연구원 (46) : 107-140, 2006

      34 The White House, "2002 National Security Strategy of the United States of America"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.14 1.14 1.17
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.05 0.94 1.239 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼