RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      관광객 중심의 거리 건물의 경계 공간체험에 관한 연구- 전주의 사례 = A Tourist-Centered Study of Boundary Spatial Experience of Street-Facing Buildings- A Case Study in Jeonju

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110100316

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As an important connecting carrier between urban public space and tourism experience, the boundary space of street-facing buildings needs to meet the short-term exploration needs of tourists and the long-term living needs of residents at the same time. The experience difference between the two groups has become the key contradiction affecting the quality of urban public space. However, the existing research on the quantitative analysis of tourist group segmentation experience is still insufficient.
      This study takes tourists as the research object, adopts quantitative research methods, combines literature review, empirical statistical analysis, and explores the influence mechanism of non-generalized differences of tourists in the boundary space of street buildings.
      Twenty-four study hypotheses were verified by multiple regression analysis. The results show that: 1) There are significant differences in the experience of tourists and residents in five kinds of spaces: transportation, recreation, commerce, service and ecology, which can be divided into general differences(functionality, safety, etc.) and non-general differences(landscape, interest, interaction and innovation), and the latter is the core contradiction; 2) The model of influencing factors of non-generalized differences has strong explanatory power, and the R² of landscape, interaction, interest and innovation dimensions reaches 73.8%, 69.4%, 68.1% and 76.9% respectively. 23 of the 24 hypotheses are supported, among which continuous attraction(landscape, beta communication =0.244), value(interaction, social beta=.226), interesting visual symbols(interesting, beta=0.249) and innovative technology display(innovation, beta=0.280) are the primary influencing factors of each dimension.
      This study analyzes tourists' experience in the boundary space of street-facing buildings, refines the factors that affect tourists' behavior and stay, and then puts forward the design guidance of urban tourism public space.
      번역하기

      As an important connecting carrier between urban public space and tourism experience, the boundary space of street-facing buildings needs to meet the short-term exploration needs of tourists and the long-term living needs of residents at the same time...

      As an important connecting carrier between urban public space and tourism experience, the boundary space of street-facing buildings needs to meet the short-term exploration needs of tourists and the long-term living needs of residents at the same time. The experience difference between the two groups has become the key contradiction affecting the quality of urban public space. However, the existing research on the quantitative analysis of tourist group segmentation experience is still insufficient.
      This study takes tourists as the research object, adopts quantitative research methods, combines literature review, empirical statistical analysis, and explores the influence mechanism of non-generalized differences of tourists in the boundary space of street buildings.
      Twenty-four study hypotheses were verified by multiple regression analysis. The results show that: 1) There are significant differences in the experience of tourists and residents in five kinds of spaces: transportation, recreation, commerce, service and ecology, which can be divided into general differences(functionality, safety, etc.) and non-general differences(landscape, interest, interaction and innovation), and the latter is the core contradiction; 2) The model of influencing factors of non-generalized differences has strong explanatory power, and the R² of landscape, interaction, interest and innovation dimensions reaches 73.8%, 69.4%, 68.1% and 76.9% respectively. 23 of the 24 hypotheses are supported, among which continuous attraction(landscape, beta communication =0.244), value(interaction, social beta=.226), interesting visual symbols(interesting, beta=0.249) and innovative technology display(innovation, beta=0.280) are the primary influencing factors of each dimension.
      This study analyzes tourists' experience in the boundary space of street-facing buildings, refines the factors that affect tourists' behavior and stay, and then puts forward the design guidance of urban tourism public space.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼