지구단위계획의 관련주체별 문제점 인식과 제도개선방안 연구 = A study on the related participants' recognition of problems and system improvement of district level planning

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since district level planning was introduced in Korea as an urban
design system, the need to actively respond to such changes has
emerged as city functions have become a complex, low-growth, and
consumer-oriented society.
Therefore, this study tried to derive problems and improvements
necessary to respond to changes in society in terms of ordering,
planning, and operating district level plans, and to create and maintain
effective plans through an in-depth interview of relevant public
officials, the companies responsible for the practical, and private
development entities
The improvements derived through the research on the related
participants’ recognition of problems are as follows.
First, it is necessary to deviate from the engineering-centered
system and the institutional support must precede on which experts in
each field, such as urban planning, architecture, and landscape
architecture, can exert their competency in their specialized fields in
an equal position.
Second, the method of resident participation should deviate from the
current formal way and secure active and diverse communication
channels through the urban regeneration method. From the beginning
of the plan, it is necessary to derive a regional agenda through
resident participation, reflect residents' opinions in the plan, and
provide feedback through continuous resident monitoring.
Third, in order to strengthen the competence of public officials in
charge, professionalism and efficiency must be improved through
consistent work performance via the improvement of the rotational
position system. In addition, a systematic management must be induced
through hiring professional public officials.
Fourth, management by a master planner should be carried out to
consistently promote the operation of district level plans with the
vision of the region. The master planner should participate in from the
start of the district level planning and be granted an authority and
responsibility to manage it constantly.
The district level plans make their frameworks for establishment and
operation through discussions and agreements of various related
entities in the process of ordering and planning, operation and
utilization. Social consensus are required for district level plans to
respond to changes in the times. Above all, unified consciousness and
efforts of the subject concerned must precede.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

도시설계의 제도로서 지구단위계획이 우리나라에 도입된 이후, 도시기능의
복잡화, 저성장과 수요자 중심의 사회로 변화하면서 지구단위계획도 이러한
변화에 능동적으로 대응하여야 할 필요성이 대두되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구는
지구단위계획의 발주, 계획수립과 운영 측면에서 사회의 변화에 대응하고 실
효성 있는 계획의 수립과 운영을 위해 필요한 문제점과 개선점을 관련공무원,
실무수행업체, 민간개발주체의 심층인터뷰 과정을 통해 도출하고자 하였다.
관련 주체의 문제점 인식조사를 통해 도출된 개선방안은 다음과 같다.
첫째, 엔지니어링 중심의 수립체계에서 벗어나, 도시계획·건축·조경 등 각
분야의 전문가가 평등한 위치에서 자신의 전문분야의 역량을 발휘할 제도적
밑받침이 선행되어야 한다.
둘째, 주민참여의 방식은 현행의 형식적 참여방식에서 벗어나 도시재생적
방식을 통해 적극적이고 다양한 소통 채널을 확보하여야 한다. 계획 초기부터
주민 참여를 통해 지역의제를 도출하고, 주민의견을 계획에 반영하며, 지속적
주민 모니터링을 통한 피드백의 과정이 필요하다.
셋째, 담당 공무원의 역량강화를 위해 순환보직제의 개선을 통해 일관성
있는 업무수행으로 전문성과 능률성을 높여야 하고, 전문직공무원의 채용을
통해 체계적인 관리를 유도하여야 한다.
넷째, 지역의 미래상과 비전을 가지고 지구단위계획의 운영을 일관성 있게
추진하기 위해 총괄계획가에 의한 관리가 이루어지도록 하여야 한다. 총괄계
획가는 지구단위계획의 수립 전부터 참여하여 향후 운영까지 관리할 수 있도
록 권한과 책임을 부여받아야 한다.
지구단위계획은 발주와 계획수립, 운영과 활용 등의 과정에 있어 여러 관
련 주체의 논의와 합의를 거쳐 그 수립과 운영의 틀을 갖추어간다. 시대의 변
화에 부응하는 지구단위계획을 위해서는 사회적 합의와 동의가 있어야 하는
데, 무엇보다 관계 주체의 통일된 의식과 노력이 선행되어야 한다.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제1장 서 론·································································································1
• 제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적·································································1
• 1. 연구의 배경 ·················································································1
• 2. 연구의 목적 ·················································································4
• 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법·································································5
• 1. 연구의 범위 ·················································································5
• 2. 연구의 방법 ·················································································6
• 제2장 관련 이론 및 선행연구 고찰··········································8
• 제1절 관련이론 고찰···································································· 8
• 1. 지구단위계획의 개요 ································································ 8
• 2. 지구단위계획의 제도 도입의 배경 ·······································10
• 3. 지구단위계획의 내용 및 수립절차 ·······································15
• 4. 최근 지구단위계획 수립지침의 변화 ··································· 20
• 제2절 선행연구 고찰 ···································································· 38
• 1. 선행연구 분석············································································ 38
• 2. 기존 연구와의 차별성 ·······························································41
• 제3장 지구단위계획의 문제점 및 주체별 인식차이 분석 ·········· 42
• 제1절 지구단위계획의 문제점 및 개선사항 도출 ··············42
• 1. 단계별 문제점 도출 ··········································································42
• 2. 주요 과정별 이슈 설정 ··································································51
• 제2절 심층인터뷰 ················································································53
• 1. 심층인터뷰 개요 ··················································································53
• 2. 심층인터뷰 결과 ··················································································55
• 제4장 결론································································································65
• 제1절 연구의 요약·············································································65
• 제2절 연구의 한계와 향후 과제 ············································· 68
• 참고문헌 ························································································69