RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      생성형 AI 시대 사회과교육의 과제에 대한 시론적 고찰 : ChatGPT 활용을 둘러싼 6가지 주요 질문들 = A Preliminary Study on the Challenges of Social Studies Education in the Era of Generative AI: Six Key Questions Surrounding the Use of ChatGPT

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109127346

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study serves as a starting point for exploring social studies education in the context of generative AI, using ChatGPT as a case study. It highlights six major questions to examine the issues and challenges surrounding social studies education. The study results are as follows: First, the problem of plagiarism with the use of generative AI is becoming prominent, which demands a philosophical and educational reconceptualization of what constitutes production and creative activities. In the educational aspect, the threat to educational activities aimed at enhancing students' capabilities is a more fundamental issue than plagiarism. Second, to counteract AI hallucinations and biases, critical thinking, one of the higher-order thinking skills in social studies, and critical literacy, a key element of digital citizenship, are important. Third, due to differences in already internalized competencies among students, there is a potential for an educational gap in the level of generative AI utilization. Additionally, the monetization policies of generative AI companies could undermine educational equity. Fourth, the traditional teacher-centered method of delivering educational services is no longer effective in the digital age. The advent of generative AI is expected to promote the emergence of 'learners and instructors as prosumers', disrupting the traditional relationship between teachers as providers and students as consumers of educational services. Fifth, if generative AI accelerates the transformation of learners into digital prosumers, metacognitive skills will gain more attention in social studies classes. This will require social studies teachers to look beyond students' metacognition and guide the learning process. Finally, to develop the ability to ask quality questions, social studies teaching and learning strategies may need to pursue a dual approach. One strategy involves actively utilizing prompts to cultivate metacognitive skills, while the other strategy involves isolating the classroom from the external world to develop basic thinking skills.
      번역하기

      This study serves as a starting point for exploring social studies education in the context of generative AI, using ChatGPT as a case study. It highlights six major questions to examine the issues and challenges surrounding social studies education. T...

      This study serves as a starting point for exploring social studies education in the context of generative AI, using ChatGPT as a case study. It highlights six major questions to examine the issues and challenges surrounding social studies education. The study results are as follows: First, the problem of plagiarism with the use of generative AI is becoming prominent, which demands a philosophical and educational reconceptualization of what constitutes production and creative activities. In the educational aspect, the threat to educational activities aimed at enhancing students' capabilities is a more fundamental issue than plagiarism. Second, to counteract AI hallucinations and biases, critical thinking, one of the higher-order thinking skills in social studies, and critical literacy, a key element of digital citizenship, are important. Third, due to differences in already internalized competencies among students, there is a potential for an educational gap in the level of generative AI utilization. Additionally, the monetization policies of generative AI companies could undermine educational equity. Fourth, the traditional teacher-centered method of delivering educational services is no longer effective in the digital age. The advent of generative AI is expected to promote the emergence of 'learners and instructors as prosumers', disrupting the traditional relationship between teachers as providers and students as consumers of educational services. Fifth, if generative AI accelerates the transformation of learners into digital prosumers, metacognitive skills will gain more attention in social studies classes. This will require social studies teachers to look beyond students' metacognition and guide the learning process. Finally, to develop the ability to ask quality questions, social studies teaching and learning strategies may need to pursue a dual approach. One strategy involves actively utilizing prompts to cultivate metacognitive skills, while the other strategy involves isolating the classroom from the external world to develop basic thinking skills.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼