『고려사절요』 수찬관의 사유와 역사 인식 = A Study for the Golyeosajeolyo(高麗史節要)’s Compilers and Historical Awareness

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There are a total of 28 authors of the book named Goryeosajeolyo(高麗史節要). These are all people who worked at a government agency called Chunchugwan. Looking at their families, some of their ancestors appear in the Goryeosajeolyo. There are a total of 7 people. The authors of the book are all officials belonging to the Chunchugwan(春秋館).
Because the authors passed the civil service exam, they studied Neo-Confucianism. There is no specific information about 7 of the authors, including their families. This is because the author without information either failed to achieve political success or died early. Or, it was a case of political purge related to the case to reinstate King Danjong(端宗) of Joseon.
However, most of the authors became high-ranking officials and elite civil servants. Because their studies were outstanding, they participated in the project of compiling national books. Among the writers of Goryeosa(高麗史), 15 participated in the writing of Goryeosa. This means that the experience of writing Goryeosa was reflected in writing Goryeosajeolyo. The author also participated in the creation of the Annals of King Sejong(世宗).
The authors knew Neo-Confucianism. Therefore, their perception of history was based on the Spring and Autumn Festival. However, the interpretation of the Chunchupilbeop(春秋筆法) differed between authors. Accordingly, they either participated in the restoration of King Danjong or opposed it.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 오항녕, "한국 사관제도 성립사연구" 한국연구원 2003

2 시미다 겐지, "주자학과 양명학" 까치 1986

3 한영우, "조선전기사학사연구" 서울대출판부 1981

4 守本順一郞, "동양정치사상사연구-주자사상의 사회경제적 분석" 동녘 1985

5 김난옥, "공민왕대 기사의 수록양식과 원전자료의 記事 전환방식－『고려사』 세가와 『고려사절요』를 중심으로－" 52 : 2013

6 노명호, "고려사와 고려사절요의 사료적 특성" 지식산업사 2019

7 김인호, "고려말 사대부 개념의 역사성과 정치적 분화에 대한 논의" 64 : 2020

8 서인원, "龜泉원유한교수 정년기념논총 (하)" 혜안 2000

9 김준석, "韓國 中世 儒敎政治思想史論" 지식산업사 2005

10 "訥齋集"

11 "牧隱集"

12 김현정, "梁誠之의 歷史認識과 歷史敎育 强化論" 30 : 2003

13 "朝鮮王朝實錄"

14 이진한, "朝鮮時代 史書의 權漢功에 대한 서술과 『一齋先生實紀』의 편찬" 74 : 2019

15 한영우, "朝鮮前期社會思想硏究" 지식산업사 1983

16 "大東野乘"

17 민두기, "中國의 歷史認識 (上)" 창작과비평사 1985

18 김난옥, "『고려사절요』 卒記의 기재방식과 성격" 48 : 2012

19 김병인, "『고려사절요』 卒記에 나타난 世評과 ‘不事生産’" 55 : 2019

20 박윤진, "『고려사절요(⾼麗史節要)』의 범례와 불교 기사 수록 방식" 69 : 2022

21 홍승태, "『治平要覽』: ‘史外傳心’의 要典－연구의 쟁점과 문제를 중심으로－" 48 : 2023

22 이정란, "『⾼麗史』와 『⾼麗史節要』의 修史方式 비교－睿宗代 ‘王言’ 기록을 중심으로－" 52 : 2013

23 변태섭, "「고려사」의 연구" 삼영사 1982

24 "⾼麗史節要"

25 "⾼麗史"