RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SSCI

      Revising Amartya Sen’s capability approach to education for ethical development

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104857049

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to examine whether Amartya Sen's capability approach can suggest an appropriate theory of education for ethical development. Many advocates of Sen's capability approach insist that his approach is superior to rival theories of education, including the human capital theory. This is because Sen emphasizes the purpose and various roles of education for achieving substantial freedom while rival theories focus on the instrumental aspects of education. A focus on rival educational theories often results in the negative effects seen occurring in colonial education. In principle, we agree with the advocates of Sen’s capability approach. However, we doubt that Sen’s emphasis is sufficient for guaranteeing that his capability approach is the appropriate theory of education for application in the context of ethical development. It does not have theoretical completion, and it gives no guidance as to conflict resolution concerning the roles, or value, of education. Nor does it give guidance as to how to implement pedagogical strategies. This incompletion allows economically instrumental values to dominate intrinsic values and non-economically instrumental values, as seen with the educational Millennium Development Goals. This prioritization is what has occurred in colonial education through the application of human capital theory. We suggest that in Sen’s capability approach, firstly, the meaning of the intrinsic value of education should be clarified; secondly, the non-economically instrumental roles of education should be explicated in the context of development; and finally, the priority of the intrinsic and the non-economically instrumental roles of education value should be taken over the economically instrumental values. In this revised theory, people’s substantive freedom is achievable through education, people’s aboriginal identities and values remain intact, and developing countries take seriously pedagogical strategies.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to examine whether Amartya Sen's capability approach can suggest an appropriate theory of education for ethical development. Many advocates of Sen's capability approach insist that his approach is superior to rival theorie...

      The purpose of this paper is to examine whether Amartya Sen's capability approach can suggest an appropriate theory of education for ethical development. Many advocates of Sen's capability approach insist that his approach is superior to rival theories of education, including the human capital theory. This is because Sen emphasizes the purpose and various roles of education for achieving substantial freedom while rival theories focus on the instrumental aspects of education. A focus on rival educational theories often results in the negative effects seen occurring in colonial education. In principle, we agree with the advocates of Sen’s capability approach. However, we doubt that Sen’s emphasis is sufficient for guaranteeing that his capability approach is the appropriate theory of education for application in the context of ethical development. It does not have theoretical completion, and it gives no guidance as to conflict resolution concerning the roles, or value, of education. Nor does it give guidance as to how to implement pedagogical strategies. This incompletion allows economically instrumental values to dominate intrinsic values and non-economically instrumental values, as seen with the educational Millennium Development Goals. This prioritization is what has occurred in colonial education through the application of human capital theory. We suggest that in Sen’s capability approach, firstly, the meaning of the intrinsic value of education should be clarified; secondly, the non-economically instrumental roles of education should be explicated in the context of development; and finally, the priority of the intrinsic and the non-economically instrumental roles of education value should be taken over the economically instrumental values. In this revised theory, people’s substantive freedom is achievable through education, people’s aboriginal identities and values remain intact, and developing countries take seriously pedagogical strategies.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 World Bank, "World Development Report 2008" A World Bank Publication 2008

      2 World Bank, "World Development Report 2000" A World Bank Publication 2000

      3 Hinchcliffe, G., "Truth and the capability of learning" 41 (41): 221-232, 2007

      4 Unterhalter, E., "Trade-off, comparative evaluation and global obligation: reflections on the poverty, gender and education millennium development goals" 13 (13): 335-351, 2012

      5 Walker, M., "Towards a capability-based theory of social justice for education policy-making" 21 (21): 163-185, 2006

      6 Robeyns, I., "Three models of education : Rights, capabilities and Human capital" 4 (4): 69-84, 2006

      7 Fukude-Parr, S., "Theory and policy in international development : Human development and capability approach and the millennium development goals" 13 (13): 122-132, 2011

      8 Nandy, A., "The post-development reader" Zed Books 168-178, 1997

      9 Rahnema, M., "The post development reader" Zed Books 1997

      10 Dewey, J., "The middle works of John Dewey (Vol. 9)" Southern Illinois University Press 2008

      1 World Bank, "World Development Report 2008" A World Bank Publication 2008

      2 World Bank, "World Development Report 2000" A World Bank Publication 2000

      3 Hinchcliffe, G., "Truth and the capability of learning" 41 (41): 221-232, 2007

      4 Unterhalter, E., "Trade-off, comparative evaluation and global obligation: reflections on the poverty, gender and education millennium development goals" 13 (13): 335-351, 2012

      5 Walker, M., "Towards a capability-based theory of social justice for education policy-making" 21 (21): 163-185, 2006

      6 Robeyns, I., "Three models of education : Rights, capabilities and Human capital" 4 (4): 69-84, 2006

      7 Fukude-Parr, S., "Theory and policy in international development : Human development and capability approach and the millennium development goals" 13 (13): 122-132, 2011

      8 Nandy, A., "The post-development reader" Zed Books 168-178, 1997

      9 Rahnema, M., "The post development reader" Zed Books 1997

      10 Dewey, J., "The middle works of John Dewey (Vol. 9)" Southern Illinois University Press 2008

      11 Sachs, W., "The development dictionary" Zed Books 1992

      12 Unterhalter, E., "The capabilities approach and gendered education : An examination of South African complexities" 1 (1): 7-22, 2003

      13 Trapnell, L. A., "Some key issues in intercultural bilingual education teacher training programmes—As seen from a teacher training programme in the peruvian Amazon Basin" 39 (39): 165-, 2003

      14 Sen, A., "Resources, values and development" Basil Blackwel 1984

      15 Sen, A., "Rationality and freedom" Harvard University Press 1992

      16 Sen, A., "Rationality and freedom" Harvard University Press 2002

      17 Taylor, C., "Philosophy arguments" Harvard University Press 1995

      18 Sen, A., "Perspectives on the economic and human development of India and China" Universitatsverlag Gottingen 2006

      19 Fraser, N., "Justice interruptus: Critical reflection on the ‘‘Postsocialist’’ condition" Routledge 1997

      20 Oh, S. -C., "Japanese colonial education as a contested Terrain: What did koreans do in the expansion of elementary schooling?" 1 (1): 75-89, 2000

      21 Hinchcliffe, G., "Introduction to the special issue ‘Capabilities and education’" 28 (28): 387-390, 2009

      22 Dreze, J., "India: Development and participation" Oxford University Press 2002

      23 Anderson, E., "Fair opportunity in education: A democratic equality perspective" 117 (117): 595-622, 2007

      24 Crocker, D., "Ethics of global development: Agent, capability, and deliberative democracy" Cambridge University Press 2008

      25 Peters, R. S., "Ethics and education" Ceorge Allen &Unwin Ltd 1970

      26 Qizilbash, M., "Ethical development" 24 (24): 1209-1221, 1996

      27 Mora´n, R., "Escaping the poverty trap" Inter-American Development Bank 2003

      28 Escobar, A., "Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world" Princeton University Press 1995

      29 Harbison, F. H., "Education, manpower and economic growth, strategies of human resource development" McGraw Hill 1964

      30 UNESCO, "Education for all"

      31 Carnoy, M., "Education as cultural imperialism" Longman 1974

      32 Thompson, A. R., "Education and development in Africa" St. Martin’s Press 1981

      33 Todaro, M. P., "Economic development" Addison Wesley 2009

      34 Sen, A., "Development as Freedom" Knopf 1999

      35 Prah, K. K., "Democracy, education, literacy and development" 2007

      36 Nussbaum, M., "Cultivating humanity" Harvard University Press 1997

      37 Sen, A., "Crisis in Indian education" Institute of Public Enterprise 1971

      38 Sen, A., "Consequential evaluation and practical reason" 97 (97): 477-502, 2000

      39 Sen, A., "Commodities and capabilities" North Holland 1985

      40 Hinchliffe, G., "Capability and education" 28 : 403-413, 2009

      41 Pogge, T., "Can the capability approach be justified?" 30 (30): 167-228, 2002

      42 Sen, A., "Beyond Liberalization: Social opportunity and Human capability" Institute of Social Sciences 1994

      43 UNESCO, "Annual Report 2006" 2006

      44 Unterhalter, E., "An introduction to the human development and approach:Freedom and agency" Routledge 2009

      45 Farrar, J., "An assessment of human development in Uganda : The capabilities approach, millennium development goals, and human development index" 4 : 74-101, 2012

      46 Saito, M., "Amartya Sen’s capability approach to education : A critical exploration" 37 (37): 17-33, 2003

      47 Terzi, L., "Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education" Palgrave 25-43, 2007

      48 Unterhalter, E., "Amartya Sen’s capability approach and social justice in education" Palgrave 2007

      49 Pieterse, J. N., "After post-development" 21 (21): 175-191, 2000

      50 United Nations Development Programme, "A new sustainable development agenda"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SSCI 등재 (등재후보1차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.38 0.18 0.33
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.27 0.292 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼