RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      검색 엔진의 공신력과 정보의 순위가 정보의 검색과 활용에 미치는 영향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76602612

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Search engines provide users with recommended links that are hierarchically ranked. Previous research on user behavior and search engines has focused on the fact that users tend to choose a link simply because it is presented as a higher choice on the first result page. This study attempts to find the underlying mechanism of users’ trust of information rankings provided by search engines. Specifically, we investigate whether and how the credibility of search engines and the ranking they provide influence (1) users’ pre-processing of the first result page, (2) scrutiny on the provided information, and (3) their intention to utilize the information.
      The findings of our experiment, which was based on a 2(high vs. low credibility)×2(normal vs. reverse ranking) factorial design, showed that the time spent on pre-processing the first result page was longer for Google (i.e., high credible search engine) than for Nespon (low credible search engine). Also, the higher information ranking, the more scrutiny on the information and the more intention to utilize the information were shown by participants. In addition, the interaction effect shows that, particularly for the Google, low-ranked information is less utilized and less scrutinized than the identical information from Nespon.
      번역하기

      Search engines provide users with recommended links that are hierarchically ranked. Previous research on user behavior and search engines has focused on the fact that users tend to choose a link simply because it is presented as a higher choice on the...

      Search engines provide users with recommended links that are hierarchically ranked. Previous research on user behavior and search engines has focused on the fact that users tend to choose a link simply because it is presented as a higher choice on the first result page. This study attempts to find the underlying mechanism of users’ trust of information rankings provided by search engines. Specifically, we investigate whether and how the credibility of search engines and the ranking they provide influence (1) users’ pre-processing of the first result page, (2) scrutiny on the provided information, and (3) their intention to utilize the information.
      The findings of our experiment, which was based on a 2(high vs. low credibility)×2(normal vs. reverse ranking) factorial design, showed that the time spent on pre-processing the first result page was longer for Google (i.e., high credible search engine) than for Nespon (low credible search engine). Also, the higher information ranking, the more scrutiny on the information and the more intention to utilize the information were shown by participants. In addition, the interaction effect shows that, particularly for the Google, low-ranked information is less utilized and less scrutinized than the identical information from Nespon.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박승관, "한국 사회의 지식-정보 효용 곡선 모형" 35 : 11-27, 1998

      2 김평호, "지식과 기술의 상업적 왜곡의 문제검색산업-검색 사이트의 정치경제학" 한국방송학회 21 (21): 132-155, 2007

      3 차배근, "설득 커뮤니케이션 이론" 서울대학교 출판부 1989

      4 이재현, "멀티미디어와 디지털 세계: 뉴미디어란 무엇인가?" 커뮤니케이션북스 2004

      5 강병준, "구글 vs 네이버 검색 대전쟁" 전자신문사 2008

      6 Hindman, M, "“Googlearchy”: How a few heavily linked sites dominate politics on the web" 2003

      7 Bolter, J. D, "Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print" Lawrence Erlbaum 2001

      8 Bolter, J. D, "Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print" Lawrence Erlbaum 2001

      9 Metaxas, P. T, "Web spam, propaganda and trust" 2005

      10 Fortunato, S, "Topical interests and the mitigation of search engine bias" 684-689, 2006

      1 박승관, "한국 사회의 지식-정보 효용 곡선 모형" 35 : 11-27, 1998

      2 김평호, "지식과 기술의 상업적 왜곡의 문제검색산업-검색 사이트의 정치경제학" 한국방송학회 21 (21): 132-155, 2007

      3 차배근, "설득 커뮤니케이션 이론" 서울대학교 출판부 1989

      4 이재현, "멀티미디어와 디지털 세계: 뉴미디어란 무엇인가?" 커뮤니케이션북스 2004

      5 강병준, "구글 vs 네이버 검색 대전쟁" 전자신문사 2008

      6 Hindman, M, "“Googlearchy”: How a few heavily linked sites dominate politics on the web" 2003

      7 Bolter, J. D, "Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print" Lawrence Erlbaum 2001

      8 Bolter, J. D, "Writing space: Computers, hypertext, and the remediation of print" Lawrence Erlbaum 2001

      9 Metaxas, P. T, "Web spam, propaganda and trust" 2005

      10 Fortunato, S, "Topical interests and the mitigation of search engine bias" 684-689, 2006

      11 Diaz, A, "Through the google goggles: Sociopolitical bias in search engine design" Stanford University (unpublished). 2005

      12 Pornpitakpan, C, "The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence" 34 (34): 243-281, 2004

      13 Petty, R. E, "The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and Controversis" The Guilford Press 41-72, 1999

      14 Petty, R. E, "The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion" Academy Press 123-205, 1986

      15 Brin, S, "The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual websearch engine" 30 : 107-117, 1998

      16 Sundar, S. S, "The MAIN model: A hueristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility" The MIT press 73-100, 2008

      17 Sundar, S. S, "The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility" MIT Press 73-100, 2008

      18 DeBono, K. G, "Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach" 55 (55): 541-546, 1988

      19 Introna, L. D, "Shaping the web: Why the politics of search engines matters" 16 (16): 169-185, 2000

      20 Pew Internet, "Search engine users Internet searchers are confident, satisfied, and trusting-but they are also unaware and naive" Pew Internet and American Life Project Press 2005

      21 Vaughan, L, "Search engine coverage bias: Evidence and possible causes" 40 : 693-707, 2004

      22 Jansen, B. J, "Real life, real users, and real needs: A study and analysis of user queries on the web" 36 (36): 207-227, 2000

      23 Nunnally, J. C, "Psychometric theory(second edition)" McGraw Hill 1978

      24 Kelman, H. C, "Processes of opinion change" 25 : 57-78, 1961

      25 Beniger, J. R, "Preprocessing and social control: Neglected component of sociocybernetics" Sage 119-130, 1986

      26 Graham, L, "Of course it’s true; I saw it on the internet!: Critical thinking in the internet era" 46 (46): 71-75, 2003

      27 Van Couvering, E, "New media? A political economy of search engines" 2004

      28 Van Couvering, E, "Is relevance relevant? market, science, and war: Discourses of search engine quality" 12 : 866-887, 2007

      29 Pan, B, "In google we trust: Users’ decisions on rank, position, and relevance" 12 : 801-823, 2007

      30 Cho, J, "Impact of search engines on page popularity" ACM Press 20-29, 2004

      31 Heesacker, M, "Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking" 51 (51): 653-666, 1983

      32 Granka, L, "Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search" ACM Press 478-479, 2004

      33 Iyengar, S, "Experimental demonstrations of the “not-sominimal” consequences of television news programs" 76 : 848-858, 1982

      34 Gerhart, S, "Do web search engines suppress controversy?" 9 (9): 2004

      35 Sundar, S. S, "Conceptualizing sources in online news" 51 (51): 52-72, 2001

      36 Garbarino, E. C, "Cognitive effort, affect, and choice" 24 (24): 147-158, 1997

      37 Petty, R. E, "Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches" William C. Brown 1981

      38 Eveland, W. P, "An investigation of elaboration and selective scanning as mediators of learning from the web versus print" 46 (46): 34-53, 2002

      39 Althaus, S. L, "Agenda setting and the ‘new’ news: Patterns of issue importance among readers of the paper and online versions of the New York Times" 29 (29): 180-207, 2002

      40 Bettman, J. R, "A componential analysis of cognitive effort in choice" 45 : 111-139, 1990

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.75 1.75 1.94
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.07 2.11 2.773 0.4
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼