RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    청동기시대 前(전)-中轉移期(중전이기) 生計經濟戰略(생계경제전략)의 추이 -湖西地域(호서지역) “先松菊里(선송국리)○○”에 대한 재검토를 중심으로- = Shifting Subsistence-Economic Strategies during the Transition of Early to Middle Bronze Ages: Rethinking Pre-Songgukri-○○ of Hoseo Region

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99800701

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since the mid-2000s, the transition of Early to Middle Bronze Ages has been hotly issued in Korean archaeology. Various stands relevant to the issue can be broken down into two dichotomized models, indigenous development and importation models. Both have simultaneously explanatory strength and weakness but recently indigenous development model is winning support, because the proponents of the model have made efforts to develop complementary reasoning for its incipient from. One of the efforts is attempt for explaining on the shift of subsistence-economic strategy and cultural divergence during the transition, so-called ‘stage of Pre-Songgukritype assemblage.`` Overexploitation and adaptive radiation in teh final stage or Early Bronze Age is key factor of the hypothetical explanatory model. Despite its novelty, we can find also logical unfairness and rack of actual proofness based on systematic data analysis from the model. I critically review its explanatory power and examine analyzing stone-tool assemblages from Early Bronze, Pre-Songgukri-type and Songgukri-type habitation sites. The results of analysis reveal that the hypothesis could not be compatible with real data. Subsistenceeconomic strategies, such as agricultural strategies pursued at Pre-Songgukri-type habitation sites were unlikely to be inconsistent, and might have been similar to ones at Songgukri-type sites. Besides the results of quantitative data analyses, information from recent excavation project shows that the hypothesis cannot properly explain what the strategies of subsistence economy during the transition of Early to Middle Bronze Ages were like. I do not agree with importation models, but indeed point out that the indigenous ones also are not enough to understand socioeconomic changes in the transition.
    번역하기

    Since the mid-2000s, the transition of Early to Middle Bronze Ages has been hotly issued in Korean archaeology. Various stands relevant to the issue can be broken down into two dichotomized models, indigenous development and importation models. Both h...

    Since the mid-2000s, the transition of Early to Middle Bronze Ages has been hotly issued in Korean archaeology. Various stands relevant to the issue can be broken down into two dichotomized models, indigenous development and importation models. Both have simultaneously explanatory strength and weakness but recently indigenous development model is winning support, because the proponents of the model have made efforts to develop complementary reasoning for its incipient from. One of the efforts is attempt for explaining on the shift of subsistence-economic strategy and cultural divergence during the transition, so-called ‘stage of Pre-Songgukritype assemblage.`` Overexploitation and adaptive radiation in teh final stage or Early Bronze Age is key factor of the hypothetical explanatory model. Despite its novelty, we can find also logical unfairness and rack of actual proofness based on systematic data analysis from the model. I critically review its explanatory power and examine analyzing stone-tool assemblages from Early Bronze, Pre-Songgukri-type and Songgukri-type habitation sites. The results of analysis reveal that the hypothesis could not be compatible with real data. Subsistenceeconomic strategies, such as agricultural strategies pursued at Pre-Songgukri-type habitation sites were unlikely to be inconsistent, and might have been similar to ones at Songgukri-type sites. Besides the results of quantitative data analyses, information from recent excavation project shows that the hypothesis cannot properly explain what the strategies of subsistence economy during the transition of Early to Middle Bronze Ages were like. I do not agree with importation models, but indeed point out that the indigenous ones also are not enough to understand socioeconomic changes in the transition.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼