국방 관련 발명의 비밀특허제도에 관한 법정책적 소고 – 일본 경제안전보장추진법과의 비교를 중심으로 – = Legal Policy Complaint Regarding the Secret Patent System of Defense-related Inventions: Focusing on the Comparison of the Economic Security Law in Japanese

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The subject of Korea's secret patents is limited to 'invention necessary for defense' in the Patent Act and the "Secret Classification Criteria for Defense-Related Patent Applications" specify the classification of technologies (IPCs and CPCs) that can be confidential for defense, however among them, cases that do not fall under the major defense supplies stipulated in the Defense Acquisition Program Act or the weapon system stipulated in the Enforcement Decree of the Defense Acquisition Program Act are excluded On the other hand, Japan's Economic Security Promotion Act, which took effect on May 1, 2024, does not limit itself to defense-related technologies related to national security and specific critical technologies necessary for national economic safety were also included in the subject of secret patents to prevent Japan's enemies or terrorist groups from illegally using them. In particular, Japan's secret patent system also introduced permission for the implementation of secret patents, priority applications in Japan, information management and penalty systems. The selection and execution of such secret patents stipulates that the Prime Minister, not the Minister of Defense (Director of Defense Equipment) or the Commissioner of the Patent Office, acts as a general tower for executing all practical tasks.
Korea also needs to actively consider to include inventions necessary to secure public safety or economic safety from attacks such as adversaries or cyber terrorism, not to be limited to defense-related inventions. In addition, along with the introduction of penalties for violating the secret patent system, active loss compensation measures should also be devised due to restrictions on the applicant's implementation by designation of secret patents.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김시열 ; 김예빈, "특허법 제41조 개정에 관한 소고" 단국대학교 법학연구소 46 (46): 2022

2 윤선희, "특허법" 법문사 2019

3 김시열, "일본의 특허출원 비공개 제도 도입과 시사점에 관한 연구" 한국지식재산연구원 17 (17): 2022

4 강철구, "일본의 경제안보 입법화에 따른 기업의 글로벌 공급망 정책동향" 계명대학교 국제학연구소 36 : 2022

5 권지현, "일본 특허출원비공개제도의 도입과 시사점" 세종지적재산연구소 12 (12): 2022

6 허재철 외 8인, "미중 전략경쟁 시대 지정학적 리스크와 경제안보" 대외경제정책연구원 2022

7 윤선희, "기술유출방지를 위한 특허출원공개제도에 관한 고찰" 한국지식재산학회 (71) : 2022

8 조용순, "기술유출 방지를 위한 비밀특허제도의 개선방향에 대한 고찰—일본 경제안전보장추진법 및 기타 주요국과의 비교를 중심으로" 한양대학교 법학연구소 39 (39): 2022

9 최재식, "기술안보 시대의 지식재산권 정책 대응을 위한 기초연구" 한국지식재산연구원 2022

10 櫻井孝, "防衛技術の守り方-日本の秘密特許" 一般社団法人 発明推進協会 2020

11 日本経済団体連合会, "経済安全保障法制に関する意見"

12 日本內閣府, "経済安全保障推進法の概要"

13 松下外, "特許出願非公開制度の解説" 経済産業調査会知的財産情報センター 20 (20): 2022

14 廣崎拓登, "特許出願非公開制度の概要について" 独立行政法人 工業所有権情報・研修館 (77) : 2024

15 日本特許庁, "特許出願非公開制度について"

16 江木淳, "特許出願の非公開化時代の到来と新たな研究開発戦略" NTT DATA 経営研究所 (69) : 2022

17 国立研究開発法人 新エネルギー・産業技術総合開発機構, "特許出願の非公開制度の概要とNEDO事業における対応について" NEDO 2024

18 白根信人, "特許出願の非公開制度に関する経済安保推進法施行令の改正案の公表" アンダーソン・毛利・友常法律事務所 2023

19 長嶺浩之, "特許出願の非公開制度について" KSI Partners Law & Patent Firm 1 : 2023

20 増田つばさ, "特許出願による技術流出を防止するための先使用権制度の考察" 日本知財学会 5 (5): 2008

21 中山信弘, "新注解特許法, 上巻" 青林書院 2017

22 日本特許庁編, "工業所有権制度100年史、下券" 社団法人 発明協会 1985

23 日本經濟産業省, "安全保障例外-GATT21条の解釈をめぐる論点" 2020

24 デジタル監視社会に反対する法律家ネットワーク, "国家安全保障を名目として企業活動と学術研究の自由を制約し市民監視強化につながる経済安全保障推進法案の廃案を求める声明, 意見書"

25 小山隆史, "各国の秘密特許制度と日本における制度も検討(2)(完)" 日本知的財産協会 72 (72): 2022

26 小山隆史, "各国の秘密特許制度と日本における制度の検討(その１)" 日本知的財産協会 72 (72): 2022

27 津久井 茂充, "ガットの全貌＜コンメンタール・ガット＞" 日本関税協会 1993

28 日本特許庁, "TRIPS協定, 知的所有権の貿易関連の側面に関する協定"