RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    영어 수동구문의 형식의미론적 분석 = The Analysis of English Passive Construction in Formal Semantics

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19570014

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In this paper, an attempt was made to provide a uniform treatment of passive constructions in English. In order to solve this problem, I provide three approaches. These are sentential, phrasal and lexical approaches.
    In chapter Ⅱ, some problems are suggested when sentential and phrasal approaches are adopted. When sentential approach is adopted, verbs and the past participle form of the verbs should be explained separately. In the case of adopting phrasal approach, two rules are needed to explain passive constructions in English. But considering the aims of linguistic research, - that is to seek universality and simplicity in grammar, there are many strong points in adopting lexical approach.
    By applying this method, auxiliary 'be', past participle and by phrase can be explained uniformly. so I adopted Freidin's syntactic arguments of passives and accommodate them with the semantic translations within the framework of Montague Grammar. Also by this method not only the sentences with univeral and exsistential quantifiers but also the sentences with verb phrases can be explained without ambiguity. The details of the process are shown in chapter Ⅲ.
    But more studies are needed to show whether this process can be applied in progressive form and more studies on 'be' verb are needed to show that passive constructions are the same as the SVC form in school grammar. If these problems are solved, we can take a uniform treatment of the 'be' verb.
    번역하기

    In this paper, an attempt was made to provide a uniform treatment of passive constructions in English. In order to solve this problem, I provide three approaches. These are sentential, phrasal and lexical approaches. In chapter Ⅱ, some problems are...

    In this paper, an attempt was made to provide a uniform treatment of passive constructions in English. In order to solve this problem, I provide three approaches. These are sentential, phrasal and lexical approaches.
    In chapter Ⅱ, some problems are suggested when sentential and phrasal approaches are adopted. When sentential approach is adopted, verbs and the past participle form of the verbs should be explained separately. In the case of adopting phrasal approach, two rules are needed to explain passive constructions in English. But considering the aims of linguistic research, - that is to seek universality and simplicity in grammar, there are many strong points in adopting lexical approach.
    By applying this method, auxiliary 'be', past participle and by phrase can be explained uniformly. so I adopted Freidin's syntactic arguments of passives and accommodate them with the semantic translations within the framework of Montague Grammar. Also by this method not only the sentences with univeral and exsistential quantifiers but also the sentences with verb phrases can be explained without ambiguity. The details of the process are shown in chapter Ⅲ.
    But more studies are needed to show whether this process can be applied in progressive form and more studies on 'be' verb are needed to show that passive constructions are the same as the SVC form in school grammar. If these problems are solved, we can take a uniform treatment of the 'be' verb.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 수동구문의 세가지 접근
    • 1. 선행연구
    • 2. 문장단계 접근
    • 3. 구절단계 접근
    • Ⅰ. 서 론
    • Ⅱ. 수동구문의 세가지 접근
    • 1. 선행연구
    • 2. 문장단계 접근
    • 3. 구절단계 접근
    • 4. 허위단계 접근
    • Ⅲ. Montague문법에서의 수동구문
    • 1. 선행연구
    • 2. 어휘단계 접근
    • 3. 양화사의 문제
    • 4. 동사구의 문제
    • 5. be의 문제
    • Ⅳ. 결 론
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼