RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공공갈등 예방과 숙의적 공공협의: 프랑스 국가공공토론위원회, 스웨덴 알메달렌 정치주간, 미국21세기 타운홀미팅, 2014 국민대토론회의 비교를 중심으로 = Conflict Prevention and Deliberative Public Consultation: Focusing on the Comparison of Commission National du Debat Public, Almedalen Political Week, 21st Century Town Hall Meeting and 2014 Korean National Public Debate

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102137442

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this paper is to assess the opportunity and challenge of deliberative public Consultation in Korea. For this, this paper compares Commission National du Debat Public, Almedalen Political Week, 21st Century Town Hall Meeting and 2014 Korean National Public Debate. Based on the comparison of four cases, this paper finds as follows: 1) 2014 Korean National Public Debate shows the potentialities for deliberative public debate, 2) but in order to settle deliberative public debate, it is necessary to institutionalize public debate and to establish social capital for public debate, 3) to design efficiently deliberative public debate, the various approaches to public debate, the adequate discussion period for debate and a wider use of professional are needed.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this paper is to assess the opportunity and challenge of deliberative public Consultation in Korea. For this, this paper compares Commission National du Debat Public, Almedalen Political Week, 21st Century Town Hall Meeting and 2014 Kor...

    The purpose of this paper is to assess the opportunity and challenge of deliberative public Consultation in Korea. For this, this paper compares Commission National du Debat Public, Almedalen Political Week, 21st Century Town Hall Meeting and 2014 Korean National Public Debate. Based on the comparison of four cases, this paper finds as follows: 1) 2014 Korean National Public Debate shows the potentialities for deliberative public debate, 2) but in order to settle deliberative public debate, it is necessary to institutionalize public debate and to establish social capital for public debate, 3) to design efficiently deliberative public debate, the various approaches to public debate, the adequate discussion period for debate and a wider use of professional are needed.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼