품질분임조 활동의 진흥방향 제안에 관한 연구 = A Suggestion on the Promotive Directions of Quality Circle Activity

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this research is to suggest the promotive directions of Quality Circle activity. Since 1975, variety of organizations in Korea have widely the implemented Quality Circle activities for their management systems. Today, Companies are facing the harsh realities of a competitive environment. This is no time for revolutionary change. Instead, Companies are instituting revolutionary change meant to have impact within a very short time frame. The Worker’s Quality Circle activity is, essentially, a trouble shooting oriented voluntary small group within their working place to improve the surroundings creatively. The industries have enthusiastically used Quality Circle activities and were influenced from them. The Quality Circle activities can be regarded as a kind of Knowledge Management where new knowledge is created and knowledge is shared in the economy.
However, the academics were less interested in this subject, as a result, there were no systematic guidances for Quality Circle activities. Also, the government was less interested in these activities, as a result, there were no systematic policy making for Quality Circle activities.
Thus, in this research, the promotive directions for Quality Circle activities were suggested which were based on the results of survey Questionnaires presented to promoters of the domestic companies. As a results of this research, to maximize the effect of TQM(Total Quality Management) in the nationwide, Quality Circle activity as a bottom-up management should be more expanded and revitalized.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "｢품질분임조활동요령 및 강령｣" 한국표준협회 1982

2 이강인, "효과적인 품질분임조활동의 단계별 진행요령에 관한 연구" 31 (31): 136-159, 2003

3 황인경, "현장 혁신활동을 촉진하라" (756) : 2003.12.3

4 이상복, "한국 품질분임조활동의 분석과 활성화 방안" 한국품질경영학회 26 (26): 293-310, 1998

5 김계수, "프로세스 품질경영 성과개선을 위한 6 시그마 프로그램에 관한 연구" 27 (27): 266-279, 1999

6 "품질하는 사람 정수일홈페이지" 2005

7 한국표준협회, "품질분임조활동활성화를 위한 자기진단" 한국표준협회 20-21, 1995

8 이강인, "품질분임조활동의 효과적 지도에 관한 연구 ; 한국품질경영학회 춘계학술대회" 426-432, 2003

9 김재룡, "품질분임조활동의 활성화방안 연구" 1997

10 한국표준협회, "품질분임조기본" 한국표준협회 39-53, 1997

11 한국표준협회, "품질분임조 경진대회 개최계획" 한국표준협회 2005

12 최현경, "품질경영 핵심영역간의 상관관계연구" 26 (26): 11-26, 1998

13 이강인, "품질 소집단활동 진흥방안에 관한 연구" 1-107, 2005

14 이강인, "팀 중심의 문제해결" 미래북 3-, 2005

15 철도청, "제4회 차량분야 품질분임조 경진대회 발표문집" 철도청 289-308, 2003

16 이강인, "사무서비스 분야-정량적 데이터의 연계성을 고려해 작성" 한국표준협회 30 (30): 52-57, 2005

17 한국표준협회, "분임조 등록현황" 품질경영중앙추진사무국 2005

18 이강인, "대회준비는 차근차근 성실하게" 26 (26): 38-51, 2001

19 이강인, "대회준비 핵심 포인트인 맥을 알고 준비하자" 한국표준협회 28 (28): 36-41, 2003

20 이강군, "대기업과 중소기업의 6시그마 추진을 위한 지침서" 좋은날 2001

21 유한주, "知的 活動으로서의 分任組 활동의 평가방법에 관한 사례연구" 한국품질경영학회 31 (31): 117-126, 2003

22 Kristensen, "“Quality motivation in East Asian countries”" 79-89, 1993

23 Kano, "“Develop- ment of Quality Control Seen Through Companies Awarded the Deming Prize” Reports of Statistical Application Research- JUSE" 1991

24 Howes, J. C, "Who is sup- porting whom? Quality Team Effectiveness and Perceived Organizational Support" 5 : 207-223, 2000

25 김정섭, "TQM과 체험적 훈련" 26 (26): 17-30, 1998

26 Joy M. Field, "Predicting the Trajectory of Manufacturing Quality with Work Team Implementation" 5 : 103-118, 2000

27 Karen Bemowski, "Motorola’s Foundation of youth" 29-31, 1995

28 Lee, Kang In, "A Suggestion on the Policy-Making for the Promotion of Quality Small-Group Circle Activity" 88-97, 2005

29 구일섭, "6시그마와 품질분임조 활동의 유기적 통합" 한국품질경영학회 33 (33): 22-31, 2005

30 구일섭, "6시그마가 품질분임조 활동에 끼친 영향에 대한 실증 연구" 한국품질경영학회 31 (31): 1-10, 2003