RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전환기의 철학과 불교사상 = Philosophy at Turning Point and the Buddhist Thoughts

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104193201

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Nietzsche pointed out that the traditional rationalism of the Western philosophy was a product of the "will to power." The spirit of "le pouvoir-savoir" (power-knowledge), that Foulcaut specified and criticized as the basis of the modernity, stems from it. The will to power in the form of "le pouvoir-savoir" refers to the "philosophy of possession" that is the very basis of modernity. Romanticism objectivism are also variations of the "philosophy of possession." The philosophy of possession, or modernity, has made great contributions to the enhancement of human conditions, especially in terms of freedom and equality. The ideals of freedom and equality, however, failed to be enhanced on the ontological dimension, for they were merely taken as meaning expansion of possession.
    The 21st century requires a shift from the philosophy of possession to ontological thinking, in other words, from philosophy of society to that of nature, from philosophy of reason to that of instinct. Nietzsche's concept of Übermensch is insightful in this regard, since it refers to the shift from social reason (or instinct) to natural instinct. Social reason has worked for hypocritical justification of the ontical will to power or selfish greed of rulers who monopolize, in Batille's words, "mastership" and establish "restricted economy." The will to power as natural instinct, on the other hand, goes for "general economy" or "non-economic economy" on the basis of "sovereignty," not "mastership," as we can see in how nature works.
    Buddhist doctrines, including those of "dependent origination" and "emptiness," are full of the insights into the dimension of natural instincts. They teach us to overcome social instincts, that lead to master/slave dichotomy, and go for natural instincts that seek for symbios of all individuals. Buddhism, therefore, has much to contribute to articulation of a new philosophy required in the 21st century, that is, the philosophy of human ontology or natural instincts.
    Korean Buddhism needs to establish, or recover, the appropriate ideal of Buddhist "practice" in order to be the agent of the new philosophy. Buddhist practice is all about shifting one's social instincts to natural ones. Each practitioner should cultivate oneself so as to live in accordance with his/her Buddhahood (= natural instincts), and then altruistic or symbiotic mode of life will be naturally accomplished. It may be called the life of a "little Buddha," which is not different from what Nietzsche envisioned when he talked about Übermensch.
    번역하기

    Nietzsche pointed out that the traditional rationalism of the Western philosophy was a product of the "will to power." The spirit of "le pouvoir-savoir" (power-knowledge), that Foulcaut specified and criticized as the basis of the modernity, stems fro...

    Nietzsche pointed out that the traditional rationalism of the Western philosophy was a product of the "will to power." The spirit of "le pouvoir-savoir" (power-knowledge), that Foulcaut specified and criticized as the basis of the modernity, stems from it. The will to power in the form of "le pouvoir-savoir" refers to the "philosophy of possession" that is the very basis of modernity. Romanticism objectivism are also variations of the "philosophy of possession." The philosophy of possession, or modernity, has made great contributions to the enhancement of human conditions, especially in terms of freedom and equality. The ideals of freedom and equality, however, failed to be enhanced on the ontological dimension, for they were merely taken as meaning expansion of possession.
    The 21st century requires a shift from the philosophy of possession to ontological thinking, in other words, from philosophy of society to that of nature, from philosophy of reason to that of instinct. Nietzsche's concept of Übermensch is insightful in this regard, since it refers to the shift from social reason (or instinct) to natural instinct. Social reason has worked for hypocritical justification of the ontical will to power or selfish greed of rulers who monopolize, in Batille's words, "mastership" and establish "restricted economy." The will to power as natural instinct, on the other hand, goes for "general economy" or "non-economic economy" on the basis of "sovereignty," not "mastership," as we can see in how nature works.
    Buddhist doctrines, including those of "dependent origination" and "emptiness," are full of the insights into the dimension of natural instincts. They teach us to overcome social instincts, that lead to master/slave dichotomy, and go for natural instincts that seek for symbios of all individuals. Buddhism, therefore, has much to contribute to articulation of a new philosophy required in the 21st century, that is, the philosophy of human ontology or natural instincts.
    Korean Buddhism needs to establish, or recover, the appropriate ideal of Buddhist "practice" in order to be the agent of the new philosophy. Buddhist practice is all about shifting one's social instincts to natural ones. Each practitioner should cultivate oneself so as to live in accordance with his/her Buddhahood (= natural instincts), and then altruistic or symbiotic mode of life will be naturally accomplished. It may be called the life of a "little Buddha," which is not different from what Nietzsche envisioned when he talked about Übermensch.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2019-06-17 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association of Buddhist Studies -> Korean Association of Buddhist Studies
    2019-06-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society For Buddhist Studies -> Korea Association of Buddhist Studies
    2019-06-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : BUL GYO HAK YEONGU-Journal of Buddhist Studies -> Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.48 0.48 0.51
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.52 0.47 0.937 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼