RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 앵포르멜 담론 형성의 재조명을 통한 시대적 정당성 고찰

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99624609

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The newly acquired American economic and political power after WWII played a substantial role in promoting Abstract Expressionism. Although American Abstract Expressionist style was introduced to Korea as a cultural signifier of freedom, sovereignty, democracy, modernity, and capitalism, a new abstraction in Korea was to be called Informel, named after French Art Informel. The focal point of this paper is the ambivalent term Informel, which was taken to name the first Korean avant-garde art, which had the burden of decolonization and modernization. Come as a belated form of modern art, it was not until the 1960s when the term Informel was officially used to describe the new Korean art. The term Informel provides a productive space to investigate the development of Korean avant-garde art in a space of ‘time-lag.’ Korean Informel implies the gap between the original formation of American Abstract Expressionism in the 1940s and the local reception of it in Korea in the 1950s. The course of the Korean artists’ adoption of western avant-garde does not complete a universal history of modernization naturally progressed through a ‘homogenous time.’ By tracing the apparently incoherent course of ‘cultural translation,’ this paper argues that Informel reveals the uneasy course of the formation of the first Korean avantgarde art.
    As to the Korean reception of Abstract Expressionism, questions can be posed whether it was a deflection of the formalist Modernist aesthetic, or an eclectic reception of its alternatives. Clement Greenberg’s aesthetic autonomy was absent in the discussion of Korean art critics and artists upon their reception of the new abstract art. Instead, Korean artists and art critics referred to Harold Rosenberg’s concept of ‘Action Painting’ and Michel Tapie’s ‘art autre.’ This paper argues that Korean artists decoded the cultural sign of Abstract Expressionism and negotiated with the dominant art form in their particular cultural and political milieu. Korean avant-garde artists sought an innovative style, which would help dismantle the unwanted colonial past by searching out a new way to express their pathos.
    번역하기

    The newly acquired American economic and political power after WWII played a substantial role in promoting Abstract Expressionism. Although American Abstract Expressionist style was introduced to Korea as a cultural signifier of freedom, sovereignty, ...

    The newly acquired American economic and political power after WWII played a substantial role in promoting Abstract Expressionism. Although American Abstract Expressionist style was introduced to Korea as a cultural signifier of freedom, sovereignty, democracy, modernity, and capitalism, a new abstraction in Korea was to be called Informel, named after French Art Informel. The focal point of this paper is the ambivalent term Informel, which was taken to name the first Korean avant-garde art, which had the burden of decolonization and modernization. Come as a belated form of modern art, it was not until the 1960s when the term Informel was officially used to describe the new Korean art. The term Informel provides a productive space to investigate the development of Korean avant-garde art in a space of ‘time-lag.’ Korean Informel implies the gap between the original formation of American Abstract Expressionism in the 1940s and the local reception of it in Korea in the 1950s. The course of the Korean artists’ adoption of western avant-garde does not complete a universal history of modernization naturally progressed through a ‘homogenous time.’ By tracing the apparently incoherent course of ‘cultural translation,’ this paper argues that Informel reveals the uneasy course of the formation of the first Korean avantgarde art.
    As to the Korean reception of Abstract Expressionism, questions can be posed whether it was a deflection of the formalist Modernist aesthetic, or an eclectic reception of its alternatives. Clement Greenberg’s aesthetic autonomy was absent in the discussion of Korean art critics and artists upon their reception of the new abstract art. Instead, Korean artists and art critics referred to Harold Rosenberg’s concept of ‘Action Painting’ and Michel Tapie’s ‘art autre.’ This paper argues that Korean artists decoded the cultural sign of Abstract Expressionism and negotiated with the dominant art form in their particular cultural and political milieu. Korean avant-garde artists sought an innovative style, which would help dismantle the unwanted colonial past by searching out a new way to express their pathos.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 미국 추상표현주의에 연관된 모더니즘 담론의 형성배경
    • II. 전후 추상을 이해하는 대안적 담론 : ‘행동 회화(Action Painting)’와 ‘다른 종류의 예술(Un Art Autre)’
    • III. 전후 한국 앵포르멜 담론의 형성과정에 대한 고찰
    • IV. 한국 앵포르멜 담론 형성에 대한 시대적 해명
    • 참고문헌
    • I. 미국 추상표현주의에 연관된 모더니즘 담론의 형성배경
    • II. 전후 추상을 이해하는 대안적 담론 : ‘행동 회화(Action Painting)’와 ‘다른 종류의 예술(Un Art Autre)’
    • III. 전후 한국 앵포르멜 담론의 형성과정에 대한 고찰
    • IV. 한국 앵포르멜 담론 형성에 대한 시대적 해명
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 최열, "한국현대미술의 역사, 한국미술사사전 1945-1961" 열화당 2006

    2 김찬동, "한국현대미술에 있어 서구의 수용과 그 변용의 속 성: 50년대 말부터 60년대 추상 및 실험미술을 중심 으로" ICAS 3 : 451-462, 2004

    3 오광수, "한국현대미술사: 1900년대 도입과 정착에서 1990년 대 오늘의 상황까지" 열화당 2000

    4 오광수, "한국현대미술 비평사" 미진사 1998

    5 오상길, "한국현대미술 다시읽기 IV: 초기 추상미술의 비평적 재조명" ICAS 1-3 : 2004

    6 정영목, "한국 현대회화의 추상성, 1950-1970: 전위의 미명아래" (18) : 18-29, 1995

    7 오광수, "한국 추상예술 40년" 재원 1997

    8 윤난지, "한국 추상미술의 태동과 앵포르멜 미술" (46) : 1997

    9 김미정, "한국 앵포르멜과 대한민국미술전람회-1960년대 초반 정치적 변혁기를 중심으로" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (12) : 301-342, 2004

    10 김영나, "추상미술과 국제성: 1950년대와 60년대의 한국미술, in: 1950-60년대 한국미술: 서양화 동인전" 예술의 전당 104-109, 2006

    1 최열, "한국현대미술의 역사, 한국미술사사전 1945-1961" 열화당 2006

    2 김찬동, "한국현대미술에 있어 서구의 수용과 그 변용의 속 성: 50년대 말부터 60년대 추상 및 실험미술을 중심 으로" ICAS 3 : 451-462, 2004

    3 오광수, "한국현대미술사: 1900년대 도입과 정착에서 1990년 대 오늘의 상황까지" 열화당 2000

    4 오광수, "한국현대미술 비평사" 미진사 1998

    5 오상길, "한국현대미술 다시읽기 IV: 초기 추상미술의 비평적 재조명" ICAS 1-3 : 2004

    6 정영목, "한국 현대회화의 추상성, 1950-1970: 전위의 미명아래" (18) : 18-29, 1995

    7 오광수, "한국 추상예술 40년" 재원 1997

    8 윤난지, "한국 추상미술의 태동과 앵포르멜 미술" (46) : 1997

    9 김미정, "한국 앵포르멜과 대한민국미술전람회-1960년대 초반 정치적 변혁기를 중심으로" 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회) (12) : 301-342, 2004

    10 김영나, "추상미술과 국제성: 1950년대와 60년대의 한국미술, in: 1950-60년대 한국미술: 서양화 동인전" 예술의 전당 104-109, 2006

    11 정무정, "추상 표현주의와 한국 앵포르멜" 15 : 247-262, 2001

    12 김영나, "전후추상과 우리나라의 앵포르멜미술, in:한국과 서구 의 전후추상미술: 격정과 표현" 호암 갤러리 2000

    13 정무정, "전후 추상미술계의 에스페란토, ‘앵포르멜’ 개념의 형성과 전개" 한국미술사교육학회 17 : 2003

    14 서성록, "전통의 파괴, 현대의 모험: 앵포르멜 미술의 전후, in:한국 추상예술 40년" 재원 33-69, 1997

    15 Greenberg, Clement, "Towards a Newer Laocoon" 296-310, 1940

    16 Altshuler, Bruce, "To Challenge the Sun: Exhibitions of the Gutai Art Association Ashiya, Osaka, Tokyo, 1955-57" University of California Press 174-191, 1994

    17 Munroe, Alexandra, "To Challenge the Mid-Summer Sun: The Gutai Group,in:Japanese Art after 1945: Scream Against the Sky" Harry N Abrams 83-123, 1994

    18 Benjamin, Walter, "Theses on the Philosophy of History, in:Benjamin, Walter, “Theses on the Philosophy of History,”" Schocken Books, 253-264, 1968

    19 Jachec, Nancy, "The Space Between Art and Political Action: Abstract Expressionism and Ethical Choice in Postwar America 1945-1950" 14 (14): 18-29, 1991

    20 Jachec, Nancy, "The Philosophy and Politics of Abstract Expressionism 1940-1960" Cambridge University Press 2000

    21 Ashton, Dore, "The New York School: A Cultural Reckoning" Viking Press 1973

    22 Galenson, David, "The New York School versus the School of Paris: Who Really Made the Most Important Art after World War II?" 35 (35): 141-153, 2002

    23 Bhabha, Homi, "The Location of Culture" Routledge 1994

    24 Greenberg, Clement, "The Decline of Cubism" 1948

    25 Kee, Joan, "Situating a Singular Kind of “Action”: Early Gutai Painting, 1954-1957" 26 (26): 121-140, 2003

    26 Plante, Michael, "Sculpture’s Autre: Falkenstein’s Direct Metal Sculpture and the Art Autre Aesthetic" 53 (53): 66-72, 1994

    27 Jin, Whui-yeon, "Presentation, Modernism, and Post- Colonialism, Informel and the Reception of the West" Columbia University 1997

    28 Cone, Michèle C, "Pierre Restany and the Nouveaux Réalistes" 98 : 50-65, 2000

    29 Willkie, Wendell L., "One World" 1943

    30 Rosenberg, Harold, "New Yorker, 6 September 1969, in Harold Rosenberg, The De-Definition of Art" Collier 188-200, 1972

    31 Heibel, Yule F, "New Unravellings of the Real? Autre Art’s Threadbare Subject Meets the New Universalism" 7 : 75-103, 1986

    32 "Artists’ Sessions at Studio 35, "Modern Artists in America" Wittenborn Schultz 9-22, 1950

    33 Rosenberg, Harold, "Introduction to Six American Artists" (1) : 75-, 1947

    34 Kida, Emiko, "Informel Whirlstorm in Korea" 218 (218): 41-54, 2004

    35 Guilbaut, Serge, "How New York Stole the Idea of Modern Art: Abstract Expressionism, Freedom, and the Cold War" Guilbaut, Serge, How New York Stole the Idea of Modern Art: 1983

    36 Tiampo, Ming, "Create What Has Never Been Done Before!’: Historicizing Gutai Discourses of Originality" 21 (21): 689-706, 2007

    37 Rosenberg, Harold, "Collective, Ideological, Combative" Macmillan Company 75-77, 1968

    38 Cox, Annette, "Art-as-Politics: The Abstract Expressionist Avant- Garde and Society" UMI Research Press 1982

    39 Greenberg, Clement, "American Type Painting" 1955

    40 Rosenberg, Harold, "American Action Painters" 51 : 22-50, 1952

    41 Rosenberg, Harold, "Action Painting: A Decade of Distortion" 61 : 42-44, 1962

    42 Gibson, Ann, "Abstract Expressionism: Other Politics" Yale University Press 1997

    43 Cockcroft, Eva, "Abstract Expressionism, Weapon of the Cold War" 12 (12): 39-41, 1974

    44 Craven, David, "Abstract Expressionism and Third World Art: A Post-Colonial Approach to ‘American’ Art,”" 14 (14): 44-66, 1991

    45 김영나, "20세기의 한국미술" 예경 1998

    46 Guilbaut, Serge, "1955: The Year the Gaulois Fought the Cowboy" (98) : 167-181, 2000

    47 김미경, "'벽전'에 대한 소고: 한국 앵포르멜의 전개과정에 대한 의문" ICAS 3 : 463-476, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국근대미술사학회 -> 한국근현대미술사학회(구 한국근대미술사학회)
    영문명 : Institute Of Korean Modern Art Studies -> Association of Korean Modern & Contemporary Art History
    KCI등재
    2008-01-23 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국근대미술사학 -> 한국근현대미술사학(구 한국근대미술사학)
    외국어명 : The Journal of Korean Art History -> Journal of Korean Modern & Contemporary Art History
    KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Korean Art History KCI등재후보
    2005-05-24 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국근대미술사학 제11집 -> 한국근대미술사학 KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.29 0.29 0.39
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.37 0.37 1.029 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼